Methyl [1α,2β(Z)]-(±)-3-oxo-2-(pent-2-enyl)cyclopentaneacetate

Eye irritation

Administrative data

Endpoint:

eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

Experimental start date 30 March 2021
Experimental completion date 30 March 2021

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

guideline study

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

2021

Report date:

2021

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Test guideline 1

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)

Deviations:

no

Test guideline 2

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)

Deviations:

no

GLP compliance:

yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

Methyl [1α,2β(Z)]-(±)-3-oxo-2-(pent-2-enyl)cyclopentaneacetate

EC Number:

243-497-1

EC Name:

Methyl [1α,2β(Z)]-(±)-3-oxo-2-(pent-2-enyl)cyclopentaneacetate

Cas Number:

20073-13-6

Molecular formula:

C13H20O3

IUPAC Name:

methyl 2-[(1S,2S)-3-oxo-2-[(2Z)-pent-2-en-1-yl]cyclopentyl]acetate

Specific details on test material used for the study:

Identification: Methyljasmonate
Chemical Name: Methyl 3-oxo-2-(pent-2-enyl)cyclopentaneacetate
CAS Number: 39924-52-2
Batch: LOT 090175
Purity: 99.03%
Empirical Formula/Molecular Weight: C13H20O3 MW 224.3
Physical state/Appearance: Colorless to pale yellow liquid
Expiry Date: 25 March 2023
Storage Conditions: Approximately 4℃ in the dark

Test animals / tissue source

Species:

cattle

Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:

Source of Bovine Eyes
Eyes from adult cattle (typically 12 to 60 months old) were obtained from a local abattoir as a by-product from freshly slaughtered animals. The eyes were excised by an abattoir employee after slaughter, and were placed in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) supplemented with antibiotics (penicillin at 100 IU/mL and streptomycin at 100 μg/mL). They were transported to the test facility over ice packs on the same day of slaughter. The corneas were prepared immediately on arrival.

Test system

Vehicle:

unchanged (no vehicle)

Controls:

yes, concurrent positive control

yes, concurrent negative control

Duration of treatment / exposure:

10 minutes

Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):

120 minutes

Number of animals or in vitro replicates:

Duplicate

Details on study design:

Preparation of Corneas
All eyes were macroscopically examined before and after dissection. Only corneas free of damage were used.
The cornea from each selected eye was removed leaving a 2 to 3 mm rim of sclera to facilitate handling. The iris and lens were peeled away from the cornea. The isolated corneas were immersed in a dish containing HBSS until they were mounted in Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) holders.
The anterior and posterior chambers of each BCOP holder were filled with complete Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) without phenol red and plugged. The holders were incubated at 32 ± 1 ºC for 64 minutes. At the end of the incubation period each cornea was examined for defects. Only corneas free of damage were used.

Selection of Corneas and Opacity Reading
The medium from both chambers of each holder was replaced with fresh complete EMEM.
A pre-treatment opacity reading was taken for each cornea using a calibrated opacitometer
Three corneas were randomly allocated to the negative control. Three corneas were also allocated to the test item and three corneas to the positive control item.

Treatment of Corneas
The EMEM was removed from the anterior chamber of the BCOP holder and 0.75 mL of the test item or control items were applied to the appropriate corneas. The holders were gently tilted back and forth to ensure a uniform application of the item over the entire cornea. Each holder was incubated, anterior chamber uppermost, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 10 minutes.
At the end of the exposure period the test item and control items were removed from the anterior chamber and the cornea was rinsed 3 times with fresh complete EMEM containing phenol red before a final rinse with complete EMEM without phenol red. The anterior chamber was refilled with fresh complete EMEM without phenol red. A post-treatment opacity reading was taken and each cornea was visually observed.
The holders were incubated, anterior chamber facing forward, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 120 minutes.
After incubation the holders were removed from the incubator, the medium from both chambers was replaced with fresh complete EMEM and a final opacity reading was taken. Each cornea was visually observed.

Application of Sodium Fluorescein
Following the final opacity measurement the permeability of the corneas to sodium fluorescein was evaluated. The medium from the anterior chamber was removed and replaced with 1 mL of sodium fluorescein solution (4 mg/mL). The dosing holes were plugged and the holders incubated, anterior chamber uppermost, at 32 ± 1 ºC for 90 minutes.

Permeability Determinations
After incubation the medium in the posterior chamber of each holder was decanted and retained.
360 μL of media representing each cornea was dispensed into the appropriate wells of a pre-labeled 96-well plate. The optical density was measured (quantitative viability analysis) at 492 nm (without a reference filter) using the Labtech LT-4500 microplate reader. Cornea numbers 9 and 11 (positive control) were diluted 1:5 as the initial permeability readings were above 1.300 OD threshold for the plate reader. The measurements were repeated a third time due to the presence of air bubbles noted in the media. The measurements were recalculated by multiplying the value x 5 to correct the reading. The corrected values are reported as such.

Histopathology
The corneas were retained after testing for possible conduct of histopathology. Each cornea was placed into a pre-labeled tissue cassette fitted with a histology sponge to protect the endothelial surface. The cassette was immersed in 10% neutral buffered formalin.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results

Irritation parameter:

in vitro irritation score

Run / experiment:

mean

Value:

0.2

Negative controls validity:

valid

Positive controls validity:

valid

Other effects / acceptance of results:

Corneal Epithelium Condition
The corneas treated with the test item were clear post treatment and post incubation. The corneas treated with the negative control item were clear post treatment and post incubation. The corneas treated with the positive control item were cloudy post treatment and post incubation.

Criteria for an Acceptable Test
The positive control In Vitro Irritancy Score was within the acceptance range. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.
The negative control gave opacity and permeability values below the established upper limits. The negative control acceptance criteria were therefore satisfied.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Individual and Mean Corneal Opacity and Permeability Measurements

Treatment	Cornea Number	Opacity					Permeability (OD492)		In Vitro Irritancy Score
		Pre-Treatment	Post-Treatment	Post Incubation	Post-Incubation - Pre‑Treatment	Corrected Value		Corrected Value
Negative Control	2	4	5	4	0		0.002
	3	5	4	4	0		0.009
	6	3	5	5	2		0.001
					0.7*		0.004¨		0.7
Positive Control	9	5	33	35	30	29.3	1.780	1.776
	11	3	34	35	32	31.3	2.235	2.231
	12	4	35	36	32	31.3	0.985	0.981
						30.7·		1.663·	55.6
Test Item	14	3	4	3	0	0.0	0.001	0.000
	15	4	5	4	0	0.0	0.024	0.020
	16	3	4	4	1	0.3	0.004	0.000
						0.1·		0.007·	0.2

 

OD = Optical density            * = Mean of the post-incubation  - pre‑treatment values            ¨ = Mean permeability                      · = Mean corrected value

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:

GHS criteria not met

Conclusions:

According to UN GHS Classification, the test item Methyljasmonate is given No Category classification under the conditions of the test.

Executive summary:

Introduction
The purpose of this test was to identify test items that can induce serious eye damage and to identify test items not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test method is an organotypic model that provides short-term maintenance of normal physiological and biochemical function of the bovine cornea in vitro. In this test method, damage by the test item is assessed by quantitative measurements of changes in corneal opacity and permeability. The test method can correctly identify test items (both chemicals and mixtures) inducing serious eye damage as well as those not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage, as defined by the United Nations (UN) Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Items (GHS). Test items inducing serious eye damage are classified as UN GHS Category 1. Items not classified for eye irritation or serious eye damage are defined as those that do not meet the requirements for classification as UN GHS Category 1 or 2 (2A or 2B), i.e. they are referred to as UN GHS No Category.
Method
The undiluted test item was applied for 10 minutes followed by an incubation period of 120 minutes. Negative and positive control items were tested concurrently. The two endpoints, decreased light transmission through the cornea (opacity) and increased passage of sodium fluorescein dye through the cornea (permeability) were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS).
Data Interpretation
The test item is classified according to the prediction model as follows:

IVIS	UN GHS
≤ 3	No Category
>3; ≤ 55	No prediction can be made
> 55	Category 1

Results
The In Vitro irritancy scores are summarized as follows:

Treatment	In Vitro Irritancy Score
Test Item	0.2
Negative Control	0.7
Positive Control	55.6

Conclusion
According to UN GHS Classification, the test item Methyljasmonate is given No Category classification under the conditions of the test.