Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2002
Report date:
2002

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
diethyl N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]aspartate
EC Number:
606-274-3
Cas Number:
192389-48-3
Molecular formula:
C14H29NO7Si
IUPAC Name:
diethyl N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]aspartate

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Himalayan
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Sex: male
- Source: LPT Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology KG, 24601 Löhndorf, Germany
- Age at study initiation: approx. 6.5 months
- Weight at study initiation: 2.2-2.6 kg
- Housing: individual
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 20 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 +/- 3
- Humidity (%): 55 +/- 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: the left eye, which remained untreated, served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
Amount: 0.1 mL

Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Observation period (in vivo):
1, 24, 48, 72 hours post application
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: not specified

SCORING SYSTEM: according to DRAIZE

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp, fluorescein

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal: #1,2,3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: mean score after 72 hours: 0.0
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal: #1,2,3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: mean score after 72 hours: 0.0
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal: #1,2,3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: mean score after 72 hours: 0.0
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal: #1,2,3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: mean score after 72 hours: 0.0

Any other information on results incl. tables

A single application of 0.1 mL KURG 101 per animal into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of three rabbits did not cause any changes at the observation time points 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours post application.

There were no systemic intolerance reactions.

               

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:



Classification: not irritating
Executive summary:

In an eye irritation study according to OECD TG 405 KURG 101 was instilled into the conjunctival sac of one eye of 3 male rabbits. Eye irritation was assessed after 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours using the Draize scale. No irritation effects were seen at cornea, iris or conjunctivae during the observation period. No systemic intolerance reactions were observed. According to classification criteria KURG 101 is considered as "non-irritating to the eyes".