Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Valid studies for skin irritation/corrosion and eye irritation are available for FeOOH (nanomaterial).

FeOOH is not irritating to the skin nor to the eye.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: scientifically acceptable and sufficient documented
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Principles of method if other than guideline:
2 New Zealand rabbits (3-4 kg) of both sex, treatment with 500 mg/animal for 24 hours, ear, after exposure removement of test substance with water and soap
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hour(s)
Observation period:
7 days
Number of animals:
2
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 0, 24 h, 2, 3, 6, and 7 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

Not irritating to the skin

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information
Executive summary:
Two New Zealand rabbits (3-4 kg) of both sex, treatment with 500 mg/animal for 24 hours, ear, after exposure removement of test substance with water and soap.

Result: not irritating

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: scientifically acceptable and sufficient documented, low amount of test substance used
Principles of method if other than guideline:
2 New Zealand rabbits (3-4 kg) of both sex, treatment with 50 mg/animal, conjunctival sac, observation period 7 days
GLP compliance:
not specified
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
2
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 0, 24 h, 2, 5, 6, 7 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

Not irritating to the eye

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information
Executive summary:
Two New Zealand rabbits (3-4 kg) of both sex, treatment with 50 mg/animal, conjunctival sac, observation period 7 days.Result: not irritating
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

In the available studies FeOOH was not irritating to the eye and to the skin.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Due to the results of the available studies for FeOOH a classification is not justified