Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: inhalation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
disregarded due to major methodological deficiencies
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Although this study was performed under GLP and following a standard test method, the report has major deficiencies. The test material was an aqueous 50% solution and the report conclusion cites LC50 values for such a solution, but tabulated data suggest exposure concentrations used for LC50 calculation are for active ingredient. Additionally, the reported very high humidity in test chambers could have adversely affected crystallisation of solid material from aerosol, making the gravimetric analysis of test atmospheres unreliable. Finally, the whole-body exposure employed is likely to have incurred intake via ingestion (grooming) and even perhaps dermal contact, since test material was reported on the fur at all test concentrations.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1992
Report date:
1992

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPP 81-3 (Acute inhalation toxicity)
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-[1,3-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2,5-dioxoimidazolidin-4-yl]-1,3-bis(hydroxymethyl)urea
EC Number:
278-928-2
EC Name:
1-[1,3-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2,5-dioxoimidazolidin-4-yl]-1,3-bis(hydroxymethyl)urea
Cas Number:
78491-02-8
Molecular formula:
C8H14N4O7
IUPAC Name:
1-[1,3-bis(hydroxymethyl)-2,5-dioxoimidazolidin-4-yl]-1,3-bis(hydroxymethyl)urea
Test material form:
other: aqueous 50% solution (clear colourless liquid)
Details on test material:
Germall II, 50% solution (Integra 22), Lot G-363-S

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Bodyweights at start of test: males 204-252g, females 201-237g. Individually caged during exposure.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation: aerosol
Type of inhalation exposure:
whole body
Vehicle:
air
Details on inhalation exposure:
4.5h
Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
yes
Remarks:
Gravimetric analysis with particle size measurement
Duration of exposure:
4.5 h
Concentrations:
Preliminary test: 5.01 mg/l
Definitive test: 0.53, 1.20, 1.98 mg/l
Concentrations were based on gravimetric measurements of samples taken at the respiration zone and reflect the solid phase or the active ingredient.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 males, 5 females
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
During test exposure, rats were observed every 15 minutes for 1h, then every 30 minutes. Following exposure, rats were examined at least once daily.

Results and discussion

Preliminary study:
Exposure at 5.01 mg/l caused 100% mortality within 4 days.
Effect levelsopen allclose all
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
1.35 mg/L air
Based on:
test mat.
95% CL:
1.03 - 1.76
Exp. duration:
4.5 h
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
1.25 mg/L air
Based on:
test mat.
95% CL:
1.02 - 1.54
Exp. duration:
4.5 h
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
1.3 mg/L air
Based on:
test mat.
95% CL:
0.99 - 1.71
Exp. duration:
4.5 h
Mortality:
0.53 mg/l: no mortality
1.20 mg/l: 40% mortality by day 2
1.98 mg/l: 90% mortality by day 3
Clinical signs:
other: 0.53 mg/l: signs included lethargy, hunched posture, irregular respiration during exposure and (hunched posture, irregular respiration) for 2 subsequent days 1.20 mg/l: signs included lethargy, hunched posture, irregular respiration during exposure. Subs
Gross pathology:
Necropsy of decedents revealed distension and discoloration of the gastrointestinal tract plus reddening of the lungs.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Exposure at 0.53 mg/l produced only transient clinical signs: animals recovered by day, gained weight and showed no gross abnormalities at necropsy. 0.53 mg/l (corresponding to 0.27 mg registered substance/l) is therefore considered a 4.5h NOAEC.

Test atmospheres:

- 0.53 +/- 0.05 mg/l, mass median aerodynamic diameter ca. 2.9 microns (ca. 7% <1 micron, 53% <3 microns)

- 1.20 +/- 0.13 mg/l: mass median aerodynamic diameter ca. 2.5 microns (ca. 8% <1 micron, 61% <3 microns)

- 1.98 +/- 0.14 mg/l: mass median aerodynamic diameter ca. 2.4 microns (ca. 7% <1 micron, 66% <3 microns)

- 5.01 +/- 0.24 mg/l: mass median aerodynamic diameter ca. 2.6 microns (ca. 7% <1 micron, 60% <3 microns)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: LC50 value unreliable, but suggestive of relatively low toxicity.
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The report conclusion cites LC50 values for the 50%-solution, but tabulated data suggest exposure concentrations used for LC50 calculation are for active ingredient. The reported very high humidity in test chambers could have adversely affected crystallisation of solid material from aerosol, making the gravimetric analysis of test atmospheres unreliable. Further, the whole-body exposure employed is likely to have incurred intake via ingestion (grooming) and even perhaps dermal contact, since test material was reported on the fur at all test concentrations. As a consequence, a reliable inhalation LC50 for the registered substance (active ingredient in the tested solution) cannot be concluded from this study. The LC50 value of 1.3 mg/L for the active ingredient is most likely an oversetimation of the acute toxicity by inhalation.