Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 476-160-4 | CAS number: 54807-34-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- May 17-July 16, 2006
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study was performed in compliance with GLP standards and in accordance with the Guidelines.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- see data source
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbitone/Beta-Naphthoflavone activated rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Concentration range in the main test (with metabolic activation): 50 - 5000 µg/plate
Concentration range in the main test (without metabolic activation): 50 - 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- Dimethyl sulphoxide
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- for TA100 an TA1535
Migrated to IUCLID6: ENNG - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- for TA102
Migrated to IUCLID6: MMC - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- for TA1537
Migrated to IUCLID6: 9AA - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- for TA98
Migrated to IUCLID6: 4NQO - Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The strains were obtained from the University of California at Berkeley on culture discs and were stored at -196°C in a Statebourne liquid nitrogen freezer. In this assay, overnight sub-cultures of the appropriate coded stock cultures were prepared in nutrient broth and incubated at 37°C for approximately 10 hours. Each culture was monitored spectrophotometrically for turbidity with titres determined by viable count analysis on nutrient agar plates. The strains were treated with suspensions of the test material using the Ames plate incorporation method at five dose levles, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system. The dose range was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 50 to 5000 micrograms/plate in the first experiment. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using the same dose range as Exp. 1, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test material formulations.
- Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result, such as a dose-related increase in revertant frequency over the dose range tested and/or a reproducible increase at one or more concentrations in at least one bacterial strain with or without metabolic activation. Biological relevance of the results will be considered first, statistical methods, as recommended by the UKEMS (5) can also be used as an aid to evaluation, however, statistical significance will not be the only determining factor for a positive response.
A test material will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met. - Statistics:
- All tester strain cultures should be in the approximate range of 1 to 9.9 x109 bacteria per ml.
There should be a minimum of four non-toxic test material dose levels.
There should be no evidence of excessive contamination.
All tester strain cultures exhibit a characteristic number of spontaneous revertants per plate in the vehicle and untreated controls.
The appropriate characteristics for each tester strain have been confimed (rfa, cell-wall, mutation etc.) - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Remarks:
- > 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Remarks:
- > 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The substance caused no visible reduction in the growth of
the bacterial lawn at any dose level.
The substance was, therefore, tested up to the maximum recomended dose level of 5000 micrograms/plate. A light precipitate (oily in appearance) was observed at 5000 micrograms/plate, this did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
The test material was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test. - Executive summary:
NaDMH was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Genetic toxicity studies carried out on NaDMH
Thompson & Bowles (2006) – reliability 1
Reverse Mutation Assay using Salmonella Typhimurium (Ames Test)
Type of genotoxicity: Gene mutation
Type of study: bacterial reverse mutation assay
Genetic toxicity studies carried out on DMH
Haworth(1982) – reliability 1
Salmonella-microsome pre-incubation assay (Ames test)
Type of genotoxicity: Gene mutation
Type of study: bacterial reverse mutation assay
Jagannath(1978) – reliability 2
Mutagenicity evaluation of dimethylhydantoin in the Ames Salmonella/Microsome plate test
Type of genotoxicity: Gene mutation
Type of study: bacterial reverse mutation assay
Thilagar(1982) – reliability 2
Cytogenicity study Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells in vitro
Type of genotoxicity: Chromosome aberration
Type of study: In vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Kirby(1983) - reliability 2
L5178Y TK+/- Mouse Lymphoma Mutagenesis Assay
Type of genotoxicity: Gene mutation
Type of study: mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Thilagar(1982) - reliability 1
Unscheduled DNA synthesis in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes (by autoradiography)
Type of genotoxicity: DNA damage and/or repair
Type of study: DNA damage and/or repair, Unscheduled DNA synthesis in mammalian cells in vitro
Conclusion:
The study carried out on the NaDMH deonstrated that 5,5 -dimethylhydantion, sodium salt exhibited no genotoxic effects.
Further more all DMH studies demonstrated that the analogue chemical dimethylhydantoin did not exhibit genotoxic effects either.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
Study was performed in compliance with GLP standards and in accordance with the Guidelines. Reliable study without restriction.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The study carried out on the NaDMH demonstrated that 5,5 -dimethylhydantion, sodium salt exhibited no genotoxic effects.
Further more all DMH studies demonstrated that the analogue chemical dimethylhydantoin did not exhibit genotoxic effects either.
As previously stated five of the studies have been performed on DMH (Dimethyl Hydantoin) and have been used for read-across purposes. A summary of data for read-across of NaDMH with DMH is given in Section 13.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.