Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: non-guideline study, non-GLP study, no E.Coli WP2 or TA 102 was tested, with QAU statement, comparable to guideline, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1983
Report date:
1983

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no E.coli WP2 or Ta 102 strains were tested, no details on cytotoxicity, no historical data, overall limited details
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
QAU statement included
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Methyl 3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate
EC Number:
228-985-4
EC Name:
Methyl 3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionate
Cas Number:
6386-38-5
Molecular formula:
C18H28O3
IUPAC Name:
methyl 3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoate
Details on test material:
- Analytical purity: > 99%

Method

Target gene:
his
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 1538
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254 induced S9 fraction of rat liver
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
20, 80, 320, 1280 and 5120 µg/0.1 ml in two independent experiments.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle used: acetone
Controls
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: see "details on test system"
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
The experiment was performed twice to confirm the results.

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48h at 37°C

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- growth of background lawn

POSITIVE CONTROLS
- Without S9-mix
TA 98: daunorubicin-HCl, 5 and 10 µg/0.1 ml phosphate buffer;
TA 100: 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide, 0.125 and 0.25 µg/0.1 ml phosphate buffer
TA 1535: N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, 3 and 5 µg/0.1 ml phosphate buffer
TA 1537: 9(5)aminoacridine hydrochloride monohydrate, 50 and 100 µg/0.1 ml DMSO
TA 1538: 2-nitrofluorene, 5 and 10 µg/0.1 ml DMSO.
- With S9-mix
TA 1535: cyclophosphamide, 250 µg/0.1 ml phosphate buffer.

Evaluation criteria:
The test substance is generally considered to be nonmutagenic if the colony count in relation to the negative control is not doubled at any concentration.
Statistics:
When the colonies had been counted, the arithmetic mean was calculated.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
other: TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 1538
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
- Precipitation: At the concentration of 5120 ug/0.1 ml the substance precipitated in soft agar.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

NUMBER OF BACK-MUTANT COLONIES PER PLATE (ARITHMETIC MEAN)

EXPERIMENT 1

 

TA 98 TA 100 TA 1535 TA 1537 TA 1538
  -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9
Dose/0.1 ml                    
Solvent Control 19 38 185 173 10 15 5 14 13 26
20 µg 21 45 178 157 12 12 6 13 8 23
80 µg 18 40 188 171 15 14 9 13 9 22
320 µg 21 42 156 175 12 12 9 13 9 26
1280 µg 20 34 192 167 8 15 5 15 7 24
5120 µg 22 38 160 151 13 9 4 16 11 15
                     
Positive Controls*                    
Solvent Control 26 - 179 - 8 11 7 - 14 -
Concentration A 534 - 657 - 395 455 103 - 731 -
Concentration B 880 - 1063 - 1394 - 724 - 968 -

EXPERIMENT 2

  TA 98 TA 100 TA 1535 TA 1537 TA 1538
  -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9
Dose/0.1 ml                  
Control 23  42 155  158 13  11 6  9 12  28
20 µg 18  41 158  138 10  12 9  12 14  21
80 µg 22  41 135  124 9  11 5  12 11  24
320 µg 26  46 150  148 11  12 7  13 10  18
1280 µg 22  37 147  143 10  14 6  15 12  23
5120 µg 17  29 128  123 11  10 6  11 10  24
                     
Positive Controls*                  
Control 15 - 128 - 12 10 9 - 13 -
Concentration A 377 - 627 - 112 525 45 - 888 -
Concentration B 605 - 989 - 772 - 219 - 1662 -

* Details on positive controls including concentrations see "Details on test system and conditions"

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with and without metabolic activation

No increase of the number of histidine-prototrophic mutants after treatment with the test substance either with or without metabolic activation was observed, therefore, the test article is considered to be not mutagenic.
Executive summary:

The test substance was tested for mutagenic effects on histidine-auxotrophic mutants of Salmonella typhimurium. The investigations were performed on strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 1538 with the following concentrations of the trial substance without and with microsomal activation: 20, 80, 320, 1280 and 5120 µg/0.1 ml. In order to confirm the results, the experiments were repeated. In the experiments performed without and with microsomal activation, comparison of the number of back-mutant colonies in the controls and the cultures treated with the various concentrations of the test article revealed no marked deviations. No evidence of the induction of point mutations by the test substance or by the metabolites of the substance formed as a result of microsomal activation was detectable in the strains of S. typhimurium used in these experiments.