Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in chemico
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
6-4-18 to 3-8-18
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442C (In Chemico Skin Sensitisation: Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA))
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
other: DPRA
Justification for non-LLNA method:
in chemico/in vitro method preferred

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Diisooctyl succinate
EC Number:
249-282-9
EC Name:
Diisooctyl succinate
Cas Number:
28880-24-2
Molecular formula:
C20H38O4
IUPAC Name:
bis(6-methylheptyl) succinate
Details on test material:
Purity, %DCS 99.6
Sample ID: GD1465-03
Sample Date: 04/11/2017

In chemico test system

Details on the study design:
The Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) was used to assess the skin sensitizing potential of the test article. Synthetic peptides containing cysteine or lysine were reacted with the test article for 24± 2 hours. After the incubation period, the extent of peptide depletion was analyzed using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) coupled with ultra-violet (UV) spectrometric detection.
The purpose of this study was to determine the percent of peptide depletion of the test article treated peptides compared to the controls. The laboratory phase of the study was conducted from 18 April 2018 to 27 April 2018 at the Institute for In Vitro Sciences, Inc. The test article was tested in at least one valid definitive assay to determine the reactivity classification for the test article based on the percent depletion of the peptide caused by the test article.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Cinnamic Aldehyde positive results
Mean Peptide Depletion Cysteine 75.47
Mean Peptide Depletion Lysine 60.75

In vitro / in chemico

Results
Parameter:
other: Mean Peptide Depletion of Cysteine and Lysine
Value:
1.46
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
non-sensitizer