Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Long-term toxicity to fish

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
fish early-life stage toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From September 11 to October 24, 1996
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 210 (Fish, Early-Life Stage Toxicity Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
no data
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
- Concentrations: 0, 35, 61, 109, 196, 349, 610 and 1089 mg/L
- Sampling method: samples were taken weekly from the control and the newly prepared media from all the test substance concentrations, and after 48 h from the same spent media at replacement of the media.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: formaldehyde was added (final concentration 1%) for preservation of the samples.
Vehicle:
no
Test organisms (species):
Danio rerio (previous name: Brachydanio rerio)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Zebra fish
- Strain: no data
- Source: commercial tropical fish hatchery M.B. Ruijsbroek B.V. (Noordvliet 159, Maassluis), The Netherlands
- Pre-exposure reproductive performance: no data


METHOD FOR PREPARATION AND COLLECTION OF FERTILIZED EGGS
- Numbers of parental fish (i.e. of females used to provide required number of eggs): no data
- Method of collection of fertilised eggs: As soon as the eggs were deposited they were collected manually and put into the test vessel
- Subsequent handling of eggs: the dead eggs or larvae were counted and removed at each replacement time; the survivors were also counted and their size and condition (swimming behaviour, presence of malformations, or any other visually observable morphological or behavioural criterion) was compared with that of the control animals.

POST-HATCH FEEDING
- Start date: from Day 10
- Type/source of feed: Artemi nauplii enriched with Selco as main food addition to rotifers (mass laboratory cultures)
- Amount given: no data
- Frequency of feeding: no data
Test type:
semi-static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
30 d
Post exposure observation period:
no data
Hardness:
210 mg/L of CaCO3
Test temperature:
24.7 to 25.6oC (refer to Table 2 for details)
pH:
Between 7.1 to 8.1
Dissolved oxygen:
The lowest measured value was 7.2 mg/L
Salinity:
no data
Nominal and measured concentrations:
0, 32, 56, 100, 180, 320, 560 and 1000 mg/L (nominal), equates to 0, 35, 61, 109, 196, 349, 610 and 1089 mg/L when corrected for the actual purity of the test substance.
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM:
- Test vessel:
- Type (delete if not applicable): closed
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: glass
- Aeration: slightly aerated
- No. of fertilized eggs/embryos per vessel: 40
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 4
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 4
- Biomass loading rate: no data


TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: ground water from locality near Linschoten (The Netherlands)
- Total organic carbon: refer to Table 1
- Particulate matter: refer to Table 1
- Metals: (trace metals): refer to Table 1
- Pesticides: no data
- Chlorine: refer to Table 1
- Alkalinity: 8-8.2
- Ca/mg ratio: refer to Table 1
- Conductivity: no data
- Salinity: no data
- Culture medium different from test medium: no data
- Intervals of water quality measurement:begining and at the end of the test, also at each replacement time in fresh media and weekly in the spent media.


OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: betwen 7.1 and 8.1
- Photoperiod: 16 h light - 8 h dark
- Light intensity: no data


EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :


VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: no


RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations: no
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: no data
Reference substance (positive control):
not specified
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect conc.:
> 1 089 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mortality
Duration:
25 d
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect conc.:
ca. 1 008 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mortality
Remarks on result:
other: >743-<1372
Duration:
27 d
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect conc.:
ca. 892 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mortality
Remarks on result:
other: >671-<1187
Duration:
30 d
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect conc.:
ca. 791 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mortality
Remarks on result:
other: >607-<1031
Duration:
30 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
ca. 61 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mortality
Duration:
30 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
ca. 61 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
morphology
Duration:
30 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
ca. 348 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
length
Duration:
30 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
ca. 196 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
weight
Details on results:
- Hatching and mortality (see Table 4 for details):
At day 6, all eggs (except one egg at 348 mg/L and one dead egg at 1089 mg/L) were ultimately hatched into healthy larvae without visible malformations, however, at the concentrations above 196 mg/L some eggs hatched with a small delay during this 6 d period.
At the end of the test (day 30), one out of eighty test animals was dead in the control and 32 mg/L group, and 2 dead at 61 mg/L. A significant effect (p = 0.05; binomial test) with respect to survival at day 30 was seen in the 109 mg/L (24% mortality) and above groups (except at 348 mg/L with only 6% mortality at day 30). The NOEC and LOEC for mortality were therefore 61 and 109 mg/L, respectively.

- Visual observations:
In the control media and at the concentrations of up to 61 mg/L the surviving larvae swam and fed actively during the exposure period and no malformations were noted during the test (except a few fish "being small" at the lower test concentrations and in the controls; they were considered to be incidental cases and were not taken into account for the estimation of the NOEC and LOEC). The NOEC and LOEC values for condition were therefore 61 and 109 mg/L, respectively.

- Growth (see Table 4 for details):
At 610 and 1089 mg/L, the lengths of the test fish were significantly (p = 0.01) lower at 1.04 and 0.77 cm, respectively, compared with the controls (length of 1.2 cm). The highest concentration tested without a significant effect on growth (measured as dry weight) was 196 mg/L. At 348, 610 and 1089 mg/L, growth (mean average dry weight per fish) was significantly retarded (1.59, 1.55 and 1.87 mg, respectively) for the surviving fish compared with controls (2.45 mg). Therefore, the NOEC and LOEC with respect to growth were 196 and 348 mg/L, respectively.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
No data
Reported statistics and error estimates:
Statistical significance for mortality was determined with a binomial test at the 95% significance level, combining the results of the quadruplicates. Statistical significance for growth was determined with the two-tailed Dunnett-test with a 95 and 99% significance level. In both cases the observations at each concentration were compared with those of the control. In case of significance at the 99% level only that level is given.

Table 3: Results of the early life stage test with trisodium EDDS

Parameter (d)

Effect

Nominal concentration (mg/L) (95% confidence interval)

Without correction for trisodium EDDS1)

After correction for trisodium EDDS%2)

6-d LC50

mortality

>1000

>1089

21-d LC50

mortality

>1000

>1089

25-d LC50

mortality

926 (682-1260)

1008 (743-1372)

27-d LC50

mortality

819 (616-1090)

892 (671-1187)

30-d LC50

mortality

726 (557-947)

791 (607-1031)

30-d NOEC

mortality

56

61

30-d LOEC

mortality

100

109

30-d NOEC

condition

56

61

30-d LOEC

condition

100

109

30-d NOEC

growth (length)

320

348

30-d LOEC

growth (length)

560

610

30-d NOEC

growth (dry weight)

180

196

30-d LOEC

growth (dry weight)

320

348

 1) 38.6%

2) 42.04%

 

Table 4: Summary of results on hatching, mortality and growth of eggs/larvae of Brachydanio rerio exposed to several concentrations of trisodium EDDS

Nominal concentration of trisodium EDDS (mg/L)1)

% of eggs hatched after 6 d

% mortality after 30 d

No. of fish

Length2) (cm)

Mean of the average dry weight per fish2) (mg)

0

100

1

79

1.20 ± 0.15

2.45 ± 0.29

32

100

1

79

1.17 ± 0.19

1.89 ± 0.22

56

100

3

78

1.19 ± 0.17

1.79 ± 0.43

100

100

243)

61

1.25 ± 0.16

2.31 ± 0.48

180

100

253)

60

1.22 ± 0.21

2.02 ± 0.40

320

99

6

75

1.14 ± 0.15

1.59 ± 0.135)

560

100

363)

51

1.04 ± 0.164)

1.55 ± 0.555)

1000

96

833)

14

0.77 ± 0.186)4)

1.87 ± 1.006)

 1) Concentration without correction for the actual measured trisodium EDDS.

2) Mean and standard deviation (dry weight calculated as explained in the text).

3) Mortality significantly higher than that of the control animals (binomial test; p = 0.05).

4) Significantly less than control (two-tailed Dunnett-test. p = 0.01).

5) Significantly less than control (two-tailed Dunnett test. p = 0.05).

6) Only 14 fish survived at this concentration; the dry weight of the fish from only one replicate could be determined accurately and is given in this table.

 

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
In a GLP study conducted according to OECD Guideline 210, the effect on hatching, survival and the occurrence of egg and larval malformations following exposure to trisodium EDDS in the freshwater Zebra fish, Brachydanio rerio, was investigated. At nominal concentrations of 348 mg/L and above, growth (measured as dry weight) was significantly retarded for the surviving fish, but no effects on growth were seen at 196 mg/L (considered the 30-d NOEC for such effects) and below. The 30-d NOEC for mortality and condition was 61 mg/L.
Executive summary:

In a GLP study conducted according to OECD Guideline 210, the influence of trisodium EDDS on hatching, survival and the occurrence of egg and larval malformations in the fresh water fish, Brachydanio rerio. The test was started with a number of 4 x 20 eggs at each test concentration and the exposure duration was 30 d. The test was carried out as a semi-static test, with replacement of the test solutions and control media every 48 h. The nominal concentrations of trisodium EDDS tested were 0, 35, 61, 109, 196, 348, 610 and 1089 mg/L. During the test, samples were taken from the control and the newly prepared test media and after 48 h from the same spent media and from the stock solutions.

At day 6, all eggs (except one egg at a nominal test substance concentration of 348 mg/L and one dead egg at 1089 mg/L) were ultimately hatched into healthy larvae without visible malformations, however, at the measured concentrations above 196 mg/L some eggs hatched with a small delay during this 6-d period. At the end of the test, one out of eighty test animals was dead in the control and there was a significant effect with respect to survival at 109 mg/L and above (except at 348 mg/L). At a measured concentration of 61 mg/L, there was no significant effect on survival. In the control media and at the concentrations of up to 61 mg/L the surviving larvae swam and fed actively during the exposure period and no malformations were noted during the test, except a few fish in the control and in the lower concentrations were small (these were considered to be incidental cases and were not taken into account for the estimation of the NOEC and LOEC).

At 348 mg/L and above, growth (measured as dry weight) was significantly retarded for the surviving Zebra fish, but no effects on growth were seen at 196 mg/L (considered the 30-d NOEC for such effects) and below. The 30-d NOEC for mortality and condition was 61 mg/L.

Description of key information

In a GLP study conducted according to OECD Guideline 210, the effect on hatching, survival and the occurrence of egg and larval malformations following exposure to trisodium EDDS in the freshwater Zebra fish, Brachydanio rerio, was investigated. At nominal concentrations of 348 mg/L and above, growth (measured as dry weight) was significantly retarded for the surviving fish, but no effects on growth were seen at 196 mg/L (considered the 30-d NOEC for such effects) and below.

The 30-d NOEC for mortality and condition was 61 mg/L.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Fresh water fish

Fresh water fish
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect concentration:
61 mg/L

Additional information

In a GLP study conducted according to OECD Guideline 210, the influence of trisodium EDDS on hatching, survival and the occurrence of egg and larval malformations in the fresh water fish, Brachydanio rerio. The test was started with a number of 4 x 20 eggs at each test concentration and the exposure duration was 30 d. The test was carried out as a semi-static test, with replacement of the test solutions and control media every 48 h. The nominal concentrations of trisodium EDDS tested were 0, 35, 61, 109, 196, 348, 610 and 1089 mg/L. During the test, samples were taken from the control and the newly prepared test media and after 48 h from the same spent media and from the stock solutions.

At day 6, all eggs (except one egg at a nominal test substance concentration of 348 mg/L and one dead egg at 1089 mg/L) were ultimately hatched into healthy larvae without visible malformations, however, at the measured concentrations above 196 mg/L some eggs hatched with a small delay during this 6-d period. At the end of the test, one out of eighty test animals was dead in the control and there was a significant effect (p = 0.05) with respect to survival at 109 mg/L and above (except at 348 mg/L). At measured concentrations of 61 mg/L, there was no significant effect on survival. In the control media and at the concentrations of up to 61 mg/L the surviving larvae swam and fed actively during the exposure period and no malformations were noted during the test, except a few fish in the control and in the lower concentrations were small (these were considered to be incidental cases and were not taken into account for the estimation of the NOEC and LOEC).

At 348 mg/L and above, growth (measured as dry weight) was significantly retarded for the surviving fish, but no effects on growth were seen at 196 mg/L (considered the 30-d NOEC for such affects) and below. The 30-d NOEC for mortality and condition was 61 mg/L (Hooftman and van Drongelen-Sevenhuijsen, 1997).

No data in marine fish are currently available.