Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to microorganisms

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
31 May 2016 to 03 June 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation))
Version / remarks:
OECD guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, Section 2: Effects on biotic systems, Guideline no. 209, "Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation), adopted 22 July 2010.
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.11 (Biodegradation: Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
Council regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008, Part C: Methods for the determination of ecotoxicity, Publication No. L142, C 11:"Biodegradation: Activated sludge respiration inhibition test", Amended by EC No. 2016/266 of 7 December 2015, Publication No. L54.
Deviations:
no
Guideline:
ISO 8192 (Water quality - Test for inhibition of oxygen consumption by activated sludge for carbonaceous and ammonium oxidation)
Version / remarks:
ISO Standard 8192, Water Quality - Test for inhibition of oxygen consumption by activated sludge for carbonaceous and ammonium oxidation (2007).
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Test item: 206534/AIdentification: Formaldehyde, oligomeric reaction products with acetone and diphenylamineAppearance: Dark brown flakesBatch: IC5B04P006Purity/Composition: 100% Unknown or Variable compositions, Complex reaction products and Biological materials (UVCB)Test substance storage: At room temperatureStable under storage conditions until: 26 February 2019 (expiry date)Purity/composition correction factor: No correction factor requiredTest substance handling: No specific handling conditions requiredChemical name (IUPAC), synonym or trade name: Formaldehyde, oligomeric reaction products with acetone and diphenylamine (BXA)CAS Number: 9003-80-9Molecular structure: UVCBMolecular formula: UVCBMolecular weight: UVCBSolubility in water: Insoluble
Analytical monitoring:
no
Details on sampling:
No details specified
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
The batch of test item tested was of Unknown or Variable compositions, Complex reaction products and Biological materials (UVCB) consisting of dark brown flakes. The flakes were ground using a mortar and pestle to decrease particle size, thereby facilitating weighing of an accurate amount. No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test item.The test item was not sufficiently soluble to allow the preparation of a 10 g/L stock solution in water. Therefore, 1-Litre test bottles were filled with 200 mL of test item mixtures in Milli-RO water (tap water purified by reverse osmosis; Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass., USA) with initial loading rates of 2.5 times the final loading rate. These mixtures were stirred in closed dark brown bottles for approximately 24 hours. Subsequently, 16 mL synthetic medium made up to 50 mL with Milli-RO water and 250 mL sludge were added resulting in the required loading rates. Optimal contact between the test item and test organisms was ensured by applying continuous aeration and stirring.
Test organisms (species):
activated sludge of a predominantly domestic sewage
Details on inoculum:
Test system: Micro-organisms in activated sludge.Source: Municipal sewage treatment plant: 'Waterschap Aa en Maas', Heeswijk-Dinther, The Netherlands, receiving predominantly domestic sewage.Preparation of the sludge: The sludge was coarsely sieved (1 mm) and allowed to settle. The supernatant was removed and ISO-medium was added. A small amount of the sludge was weighed and dried overnight at ca. 105°C to determine the amount of suspended solids (3.0 g/L of sludge). The pH was 6.9 on the day of testing. The batch of sludge was used one day after collection; therefore 50 mL of synthetic medium (=sewage feed) was added per litre of activated sludge at the end of the collection day. The sludge was kept aerated at test temperature until use.Medium: Adjusted ISO medium, formulated using RO-water (tap water purified by reverse osmosis; GEON Waterbehandeling, Berkel-Enschot, The Netherlands)Rationale: Recognized by international guidelines as the recommended test system.
Test type:
flow-through
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
yes
Total exposure duration:
3 h
Post exposure observation period:
No post exposure observation period specified in the study report.
Hardness:
Not specified
Test temperature:
The temperature continuously measured in the temperature control vessel ranged between 20 and 21°C during the test, and complied with the requirements as laid down in the study plan (20 ± 2°C).
pH:
The pH in all test vessels, before addition of sludge was between 7.6 and 7.7. After the 3 hour exposure period the pH was between 7.4 and 7.9.
Dissolved oxygen:
Not applicable - Inhibition of respiration study
Salinity:
Not specified
Conductivity:
Not specified
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal concentrations: In a combined limit/range-finding test loading rates of 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L were tested.The highest loading rate was tested in triplicate, lower loading rates consisted of one replicate.
Details on test conditions:
Contact time: 3 hours, during which aeration and stirring took place.Vessels: All glass open bottles/vessels.Milli-RO water: Tap water purified by reverse osmosis (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass., USA).Synthetic medium (=sewage feed): 16 g peptone; 11 g meat extract; 3 g urea; 0.7 g NaCl; 0.4 g CaCl2.2H2O; 0.2 g MgSO4.7H2O; 2.8 g K2HPO4Dissolved in Milli-RO water, made up to 1 litre and filtered. The pH was within 7.5 ± 0.5.Inhibitor of nitrification: A 2.32 g/L solution of N-allylthiourea (ATU, Merck Schuchardt OHG) was prepared. 2.5 mL of this solution was added to 500 mL final test medium (final ATU concentration: 11.6 mg/L).Air supply: Clean, oil-free air.Aeration: The aeration was adjusted in such a way that the dissolved oxygen concentration at the start was above 60-70% saturation (60% of air saturation is > 5 mg/L at 20°C) and to maintain the sludge flocs in suspension.Test set up: In a combined limit/range-finding test loading rates of 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L were tested. The highest loading rate was tested in triplicate, lower loading rates consisted of one replicate. In addition, a blank control (6 replicates) and a nitrification control (2 replicates) were included. Furthermore, an abiotic control (1 replicate) and the highest loading rate with a nitrification inhibitor (3 replicates) were tested.Performance of the test: The synthetic medium (16 mL) made up to 50 mL with Milli-RO and 200 mL test item solution were mixed (total volume 250 mL). The pH was determined. Thereafter 250 mL activated sludge was added. This was the start of the test.After the 3-hour contact time, the oxygen consumption was recorded for a period of approximately 10 minutes. During measurement, the sample was not aerated but continuously stirred on a magnetic stirrer.The pH was determined in the remaining part of the reaction mixture. This procedure was repeated for all test/reference item concentrations and controls.The medium temperature was recorded continuously in a temperature control vessel(s). The temperature control vessel(s) was/were identically prepared compared to the control vessels.A temperature control vessel with a REES sensor was placed in each fume cupboard of the climate room.Oxygen recording: Determination of oxygen was performed with multiple oxygen probes connected to a BlueBox (GO-Systemelektronik GmbH, Germany), a multichannel measuring and controlling system.
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
3,5-dichlorophenol
Duration:
3 h
Dose descriptor:
other: NOELR
Effect conc.:
1 000 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
inhibition of total respiration
Duration:
3 h
Dose descriptor:
other: ELR50
Effect conc.:
> 1 000 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
inhibition of total respiration
Details on results:
Inhibition of the respiration rateIn the combined limit/range-finding test no statistically significant inhibition of the respiration rate of the sludge was recorded at a loading rate of 1000 mg test item per litre.Therefore, the ELR50 exceeded the highest loading rate tested (1000 mg/L).There was no significant oxygen uptake from abiotic processes and the result at 1000 mg/L with a nitrification inhibitor showed that the heterotrophic inhibition of the respiration rate was comparable to the total inhibition. Based on the results of the total and heterotrophic inhibition, nitrification was calculated to be 29% inhibited. Since heterotrophic respiration was stimulated and nitrification is calculated using the total and heterotrophic respiration rate, inhibition of nitrification may be overestimated. Since no distorted or biphasic dose-response curve for total respiration was observed, the effect on nitrification was not required according to the guidelines and was therefore not further investigated.Experimental conditionsThe pH in all test vessels, before addition of sludge was between 7.6 and 7.7. After the 3 hour exposure period the pH was between 7.4 and 7.9.The temperature continuously measured in the temperature control vessel ranged between 20 and 21°C during the test, and complied with the requirements as laid down in the study plan (20 ± 2°C).
Results with reference substance (positive control):
Reported in table form - see Any other information
Reported statistics and error estimates:
Not specified

Results: respiration rate/inhibition, pH values

Replicate

Loading rate (mg/L)

pH

Respiration rate

% Inhibition respiration rate (mean value)

Start

End

(mg O2/L.h)

(mg (O2/L.h)1

C 1

0

7.7

7.7

38.80

25.87

 

C 2

0

7.7

7.7

43.59

29.06

 

C 3

0

7.7

7.6

44.10

29.40

 

C 4

0

7.7

7.6

49.06

32.71

 

C 5

0

7.7

7.6

42.85

28.57

 

C 6

0

7.7

7.7

40.40

26.93

 

C Mean

 

 

 

43.13 (RTB)

28.76

 

SD

 

 

 

3.54

2.36

 

CV (%)

 

 

 

8

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CN 1

0

7.7

7.9

31.42

20.95

 

CN 2

0

7.7

7.8

38.15

25.43

 

CN Mean

 

 

 

34.79 (RHB)

23.19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

R 1

2.0

7.7

7.9

31.62

21.08

26.69

R 2

5.0

7.7

7.8

31.61

21.07

26.72

R 3

12

7.7

7.7

16.70

11.13

61.28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

T 1

10

7.6

7.7

35.04

23.36

18.76

T 2

100

7.6

7.7

44.10

29.40

-2.24

T 3a

1000

7.6

7.7

47.46

31.64

-10.03

T 3b

1000

7.6

7.6

44.64

29.76

-3.49

T 3c

1000

7.6

7.7

39.98

26.65

7.31

T3 Mean

 

 

 

44.03 (RT)

29.35

-2.07 (IT)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TN a

1000

7.7

7.9

40.50

27.00

-16.43

TN b

1000

7.7

7.9

33.50

22.33

3.69

TN c

1000

7.6

7.9

40.38

26.92

-16.08

TN Mean

 

 

 

38.13 (RH)

25.42

-9.61 (IH)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TA

1000

7.6

7.4

0.06

0.04

99.86

C:            Blank control                                          RTB:         Total respiration blank

CN:         Nitrification control                                   RHB:         Heterotrophic respiration in the nitrification control

R:            Reference item, 3,5-dichlorophenol      RT:          Total respiration with test item2

T:            Test item2                                             RH:          Heterotrophic respiration with test item2

TA:          Abiotic control of test item2                  IT:            % inhibition of total respiration relative to RTB

TN:         Test item2with N-allylthiourea             IH:           % inhibition of heterotrophic respiration relative to RHB

SD:          Standard deviation                                

CV:          Coefficient of variation          

1              The amount of suspended solids in the final test mixture was 1.5 g/L                               

2              Test item consists of: Formaldehyde, oligomeric reactions products with acetone and diphenylamine

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the present test Formaldehyde, oligomeric reaction products with acetone and diphenylamine was not toxic to waste water bacteria (activated sludge) at a loading rate of 1000 mg/L (NOELR). The ELR50 was above 1000 mg/L.
Executive summary:

The influence of Formaldehyde, oligomeric reaction products with acetone and diphenylamine on the respiration rate of activated sludge was investigated after a contact time of 3 hours.

 

The study procedures described in this report were based on the OECD guideline No. 209, 2010. In addition, the procedures were designed to meet the test methods of the Council Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 of 30 May 2008, Publication No. L142, Part C11 (amended 2015) and ISO Standard 8192 (2007).

 

The batch of test item tested was of Unknown or Variable compositions, Complex reaction products and Biological materials (UVCB) consisting of dark brown flakes. No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test item.

 

The test item was not sufficiently soluble to allow the preparation of a 10 g/L stock solution in water. Therefore, the test item – Milli-RO water mixtures were magnetically stirred for a period of approximately 24 hours. Subsequently, synthetic medium, sludge and Milli-RO water were added resulting in the required loading rates. Optimal contact between the test item and test medium was ensured applying continuous aeration and stirring during the 3-hour exposure period. Thereafter, oxygen consumption was recorded for approximately 10 minutes.

 

In a combined limit/range-finding test loading rates of 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L were tested.

The highest loading rate was tested in triplicate, lower loading rates consisted of one replicate. Furthermore, at 1000 mg/L an abiotic control (1 replicate) and three replicates with a nitrification inhibitor were tested. Responses were compared to the blank and nitrification controls.

 

No statistically significant inhibition of the respiration rate of the sludge was recorded at a loading rate of 1000 mg test item per litre.

 

The batch of activated sludge was tested for sensitivity with the reference item 3,5-dichlorophenol, and showed normal sensitivity.

 

The study met the acceptability criteria prescribed by the study plan and was considered valid.

 

Formaldehyde, oligomeric reaction products with acetone and diphenylamine was not toxic to waste water (activated sludge) bacteria at a loading rate of 1000 mg/L (NOELR). The ELR50 was above 1000 mg/L.

Description of key information

The key value was determined in a GLP accredited laboratory study in accordance with OECD guideline No. 209, 2010, EU Method C11 (amended 2015) and ISO Standard 8192 (2007).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC50 for microorganisms:
1 000 mg/L
EC10 or NOEC for microorganisms:
1 000 mg/L

Additional information

The influence of formaldehyde, oligomeric reaction products with acetone and diphenylamine on the respiration rate of activated sludge was investigated after a contact time of 3 hours.

 

The test item was not sufficiently soluble to allow the preparation of a 10 g/L stock solution in water. Therefore, the test item – Milli-RO water mixtures were magnetically stirred for a period of approximately 24 hours. Subsequently, synthetic medium, sludge and Milli-RO water were added resulting in the required loading rates. Optimal contact between the test item and test medium was ensured applying continuous aeration and stirring during the 3-hour exposure period. Thereafter, oxygen consumption was recorded for approximately 10 minutes.

 

In a combined limit/range-finding test loading rates of 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L were tested.

The highest loading rate was tested in triplicate, lower loading rates consisted of one replicate. Furthermore, at 1000 mg/L an abiotic control (1 replicate) and three replicates with a nitrification inhibitor were tested. Responses were compared to the blank and nitrification controls.

 

The batch of activated sludge was tested for sensitivity with the reference item 3,5-dichlorophenol, and showed normal sensitivity.

 

Formaldehyde, oligomeric reaction products with acetone and diphenylamine was not toxic to waste water (activated sludge) bacteria at a loading rate of 1000 mg/L (NOELR). The ELR50 was above 1000 mg/L.