Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
12-13 February 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Not applicable
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
10 January 2013

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
cis-α,α,4-trimethylcyclohexanemethanol
EC Number:
230-795-1
EC Name:
cis-α,α,4-trimethylcyclohexanemethanol
Cas Number:
7322-63-6
Molecular formula:
C10H20O
IUPAC Name:
cis-2-(4-methylcyclohexyl)propan-2-ol
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
trans-α,α,4-trimethylcyclohexanemethanol
EC Number:
225-844-9
EC Name:
trans-α,α,4-trimethylcyclohexanemethanol
Cas Number:
5114-00-1
Molecular formula:
C10H20O
IUPAC Name:
trans-2-(4-methylcyclohexyl)propan-2-ol
Constituent 3
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
cis-4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexanol
Cas Number:
3901-95-9
Molecular formula:
C10H20O
IUPAC Name:
cis-4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexanol
Constituent 4
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
trans-4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexanol
Cas Number:
3901-93-7
Molecular formula:
C10H20O
IUPAC Name:
trans-4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexanol
impurity 1
Reference substance name:
Non identified impurities
Molecular formula:
Not applicable
IUPAC Name:
Non identified impurities
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
Batch No. MP8 du 29/10/2013
Purity: 98.8% (sum of the 4 main constituents)
Name of the test item (as cited in the study report): DIHYDROTERPINEOL MULTICONSTITUENT
IUPAC Name of the test item: Reaction mass of cis-2-(4-methylcyclohexyl) propan-2-ol and trans-2-(4-methylcyclohexyl) propan-2-ol and
cis- 4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexanol and trans- 4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexanol
Synonym: Reaction mass of cis-α,α-4-trimethyl-cyclohexanemethanol and trans-α,α-4-trimethyl-cyclohexanemethanol and cis-1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-cyclohexanol and trans-1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-cyclohexanol
Physical state: colourless – slightly amber liquid
Storage Conditions: +2°C to +8°C, under nitrogen and protected from light
Expiry Date: 28 October 2015

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: Bovine eye
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Origin: Bovine eyes were obtained from EVA, Saint-Pierre-sur-Dives, France.
Age: Bovine cattle were up to 12 months old.
Transport from supplier to testing laboratory: The eyes were transported to testing laboratory at ambient temperature, immerged in buffered Hanks medium containing an antibiotic [Hank’s Balanced Salts Solution (HBSS) plus penicillin/streptomycin (100 units/100 μg/mL final)]. A container with smooth internal surfaces was used for the transport to avoid damage to the corneas.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 μL (± 8 μL) of test item was applied on each cornea
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted

CONTROLS:
Negative control: 0.9 % sodium chloride solution
Positive control: 10 % sodium hydroxide solution
Duration of treatment / exposure:
The test item was evaluated by using a treatment time of 10 minutes ± 30 seconds.
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
2 hours ± 10 minutes in a water bath at 32 ± 1°C.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Total: 9 corneas - 3 corneas/group for test item, negative and positive controls
Details on study design:
Dose formulation application:
As the test item was a non-viscous liquid, the closed-chamber method was used as follows: the test and control items were introduced into the anterior chamber of the corneal holder through the dosing holes, to cover the epithelial side of the cornea. Then the dosing holes were sealed.

Treatment of corneas:
Corneas obtained from freshly slaughtered cattle (from abattoir) were mounted in corneal holders with the endothelial side against the O-ring of the posterior chamber. For pre-incubation, both chambers of the corneal holder were filled with MEM culture media supplemented with 1% fetal bovine serum plus penicillin/streptomycin (cMEM) and pre-incubated for 1 h and 5 minutes ± 5 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C. Then MEM was removed & then refilled with fresh cMEM and corneas were examined macroscopically for any defects. Then, the opacity of the cornea was measured to obtain OPT0. The medium was removed from anterior chamber and the test item was applied onto the epithelium of the cornea. After application of the dose formulation, the holders were incubated, vertically (cornea positioned horizontally with the treated side uppermost) in a water bath at 32 ± 1 °C, for 10 minutes. At the completion of the treatment period, the test and control items were removed from the front opening of the anterior chamber and the corneas were rinsed. The corneas were then incubated for 2 h ± 10 minutes in a water bath at 32 ± 1 °C and the second opacity measurement (OPT2) was performed.

Permeability determination
- Application of sodium fluorescein: After the second opacity measurement, the medium of the anterior chamber was removed and filled with a fluorescein solution (4 mg/mL). The holders were then incubated vertically (cornea positioned horizontally with the fluorescein-treated side uppermost) in a water bath at 32 ± 1 °C for 90 ± 5 minutes. At the end of the incubation, the optical density at 490 nm (OD490) of the solution from the posterior chamber of each holder was measured in order to determine the permeability of the cornea.

OTHERS:
- Macroscopic examination: After permeability determination, the corneas were removed from the holders and observed for opaque spots, other irregularities and any separation of the epithelium.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
1
Value:
0
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
2
Value:
93
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
3
Value:
20
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid

In vivo

Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Macroscopic examinations: No notable opaque spots or irregularities were observed on negative control corneas. Fluorescein fixation was observed on all test item-treated corneas. Opacity, fluorescein fixation and thickening of the corneas were observed on those treated with the positive control.
- In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS) for test item and positive control were 20 and 187, respectively.
Other effects:
None

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 7.3.2/1: Eye irritation – results

GROUP

OPACITY

PERMEABILITY

SCORE

 

Holder

OPT0

OPT2

OPT2-OPT0

cOPT

OD490 nm

cOD490 nm

Negative

control

22

3

2

-1.0

-

0.002

-

-

35

3

2

-1.0

-

0.004

-

-

8

3

2

-1.0

-

0.021

-

-

Mean

-

-

-1.0

-

0.009

-

-

SD

-

-

0.0

-

0.010

-

-

Test item

45

2

0

-2.0

-1.0

0.106

0.097

0

5

3

15

12.0

13.0

1.744

1.735

39

38

3

16

13.0

14.0

0.439

0.430

20

Mean

-

-

-

8.7

-

0.754

20

SD

-

-

-

8.4

-

0.866

19.3

Positive

control

42

3

129

126.0

127.0

5.248

5.239

206

18

3

111

108.0

109.0

5.312

5.303

189

16

4

115

111.0

112.0

3.736

3.727

168

Mean

-

-

-

116.0

-

4.756

187

SD

-

-

-

9.6

-

0.892

18.9

 

OD: optical density

cOD: corrected optical density

cOPT: corrected corneal opacity

SD: standard deviation

OPT0: corneal opacity before treatment

OPT2: corneal opacity after the 2 h recovery period

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: not predictable
Conclusions:
The ocular corrosive or severe irritant potential of test item dihydroterpineol multiconstituent could not be predicted. The test item could not be identified as inducing serious eye damage (UN GHS Category 1) or as a test chemical not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage (no Category).
According to OECD Guideline 437, further testing should be conducted for classification and labeling purposes.
Executive summary:

In an in vitro eye irritation study performed according to OECD Guideline 437 and in compliance with GLP, 750 μL (± 8 μL) of undiluted test item dihydroterpineol multiconstituent was applied to isolated bovine corneas for 10 minutes followed by an incubation period of 2 h at 32 °C. Three corneas were used for each treated series (undiluted test item; negative control; positive control). The two endpoints, decreased light transmission through the cornea (opacity) and increased passage of sodium fluorescein dye through the cornea (permeability), were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS).

No notable opaque spots or irregularities were observed on negative control corneas. Fluorescein fixation was observed on all test item-treated corneas. Opacity, fluorescein fixation and thickening of the corneas were observed on those treated with the positive control. In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS) for test item and positive control were 20 and 187, respectively. 

 

Therefore, the ocular corrosive or severe irritant potential of the test item could not be predicted. The test item could not be identified as inducing serious eye damage (UN GHS Category 1) or as a test chemical not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage (no Category).

According to OECD Guideline 437, further testing should be conducted for classification and labeling purposes.