Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 626-470-2 | CAS number: 5405-40-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2004-10-13 to 2004-12-21
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: OECD guideline compliant GLP compliant
Data source
Reference
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 004
- Report date:
- 2004
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Version / remarks:
- as at 1992
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-C (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Carbon Dioxide Evolution Test)
- Version / remarks:
- as at 1992
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- dl-Lactone
- IUPAC Name:
- dl-Lactone
- Reference substance name:
- DL-Pantolactone
- IUPAC Name:
- DL-Pantolactone
- Reference substance name:
- RS-Pantolactone
- IUPAC Name:
- RS-Pantolactone
- Reference substance name:
- (±)-dihydro-3-hydroxy-4,4-dimethylfuran-2(3H)-one
- EC Number:
- 201-210-7
- EC Name:
- (±)-dihydro-3-hydroxy-4,4-dimethylfuran-2(3H)-one
- Cas Number:
- 79-50-5
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-hydroxy-4,4-dimethyldihydrofuran-2(3H)-one
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): dl-Lactone (Synonms: DL-Pantolactone, RS-Pantolactone)
- Physical state: white crystalline mass
- Analytical purity: 99.6 %
- Purity test date: 2004-09-24
- Lot/batch No.: 451
- Date of manufacture: 2004-09-21
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 30 September 2005
- Stability under test conditions: Stable under storage conditions, Stability in vehicle (water) at least for 4 h
- Storage condition of test material: In refrigerator in the dark
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
Constituent 4
Study design
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge (e.g. location, sampling depth, contamination history, procedure): activated sludge, freshly obtained from a
municipal sewage treatment plant: 'Waterschap de Maaskant', 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands, receiving predominantly domestic sewage
- Laboratory culture: kept under continuous aeration until further treatment, suspended solids was 4.9 g/I in the concentrated sludge (information
obtained from the municipal sewage treatment plant).
- Method of cultivation: not cultivated
- Storage conditions: see above
- Storage length: not stored, freshly obtained sludge was used - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
Initial test substance concentration
- Initial conc.:
- 21.5 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimationopen allclose all
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- DOC removal
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of media:
- Stock solutions
A) 8.50 g KH2PO4 21.75 g K2HPO4 67.20 g Na2HPO4.12H20
0.50 g NH4Cl
dissolved in Milli-Q water and made up to 1 L, pH 7.4 ± 0.2
B) 22.50 g MgSO4.7H20 dissolved in Milli-Q water and made up to 1 L
C) 36.40 g CaCl2.2H20 dissolved in Milli-Q water and made up to 1 L
D) 0.25 g FeC13.6H20 dissolved in Milli-Q water and made up to 1 L
- Mineral medium
1 L mineral medium contains: 10 ml of solution (A), 1 ml of solutions (B) to (D) and Milli-RO water.
Barium Hydroxide solution for CO2 absorber
0.0125 M Ba(OH)2 (Merck KGaA, Germany or Boom, the Netherlands), stored in a sealed vessel to prevent absorption of CO2 from the air.
Synthetic air (CO2 < 1 ppm)
- mixture of oxygen (21%) and nitrogen (79%)
- passed through a bottle, containing 0.5 - 1 litre 0.0125 M Ba(OH)2 solution to trap CO2 which might be present in small amounts. The synthetic air was sparged through the scrubbing solutions at a rate of approximately 1-2 bubbles per second (ca. 30-100 ml/min).
- Reference substance:
Name Sodium Acetate
Molecular formula C2H3NaO2
Molecular weight 82.04
Description White powder (determined at NOTOX)
CAS number 127-09-3
Batch number TA820068 033
Article number 1.06268.0250
Purity Min 99.0% (taken from label)
Expiry Date 15 November 2005 (determined at NOTOX)
Certified No
Storage conditions At room temperature in the dark
Supplier Merck
- Solubilising agent (type and concentration if used): not used
- Test temperature: between 21.1 and 22.9°C.
- pH: 7.5 - 7.8 (see table 1 for details)
- pH adjusted: no, buffer capacity of mineral medium was sufficient
- Aeration of dilution water: aerated
- Suspended solids concentration:
- amount of the sludge corresponding to approximately 30 mg/L suspended solids was added to the mineral medium
- in the adsorption control an amount of the sludge corresponding to approximately 1000 mg/I suspended solids was used
- Continuous darkness: no, but use of brown test bottles
TEST SYSTEM
- Culturing apparatus: 2 litre all-glass brown coloured bottles
- Number of culture flasks/concentration:
- Test suspension: containing test substance and inoculum (2 bottles)
- Inoculum blank: containing only inoculum (2 bottles)
- Procedure control: containing reference substance and inoculum (1 bottle)
- Toxicity control: containing test substance, reference substance and inoculum (1 bottle)
- Abiotic control: containing test substance and sterilising agent 1 (1 bottle)
- Adsorption control: containing test substance, inoculum and sterilising agents (1 bottle)
- Additional adsorption control (only used for DOC analyses): containing test substance at 100 mg/L and inoculum at 1000 mg/L (1 bottle, not in
series with the other bottles and not connected to CO2-absorbers)
- Method used to create aerobic conditions: synthetic air sparged through the scrubbing solutions (see above) at a rate of approximately 1-2
bubbles per second (ca. 30-100 ml/min)
- Test performed in closed vessels due to significant volatility of test substance: no
- Test performed in open system: no
- Details of trap for CO2 and volatile organics if used:
three CO2-absorbers (bottles filled with 100 ml 0.0125 M Ba(OH)2) connected in series to the exit air line of each test bottle
- Solution preparation:
- mineral components, Milli-RO water (ca. 80% total volume, composition see above) and inoculum (1% final volume) added to each bottle and aerated with synthetic air overnight to purge the system of CO2
- test substance and positive control added to the bottles containing the microbial organisms and mineral components (ca. 80% of total volume)
- volumes of suspensions made up to 2 litres with Milli-RO water, resulting in the mineral medium described above
SAMPLING
- Sampling frequency: 3 h after addition of the test substance and on day 1, 7 (inconclusive results), 14, 16, 21, 28 and 29
- Sampling method: CO2 traps and sampling for DOC as described above under "Details on analytic methods"
- Sterility check if applicable: no
- Sample storage before analysis: directly analysed
CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM
- Inoculum blank: yes
- Abiotic sterile control: yes
- Toxicity control: yes
- Other: Additional adsorption control (with high amount of inoculum)
for details see above under "Number of culture flasks/concentration: "
STATISTICAL METHODS: no special statuistic used, calculations according to OECD 301 B
Reference substance
- Reference substance:
- acetic acid, sodium salt
- Remarks:
- for details see above under "reference substance"
Results and discussion
- Preliminary study:
- not applicable
- Test performance:
- - The positive control substance was degraded by at least 60% (67%) within 14 days.
- The difference of duplicate values for %-degradation of dl-Lactone was always less than 20.
- The total CO2 release in the blank at the end of the test exceeded 40 mg/I, but did not exceeded 70 mg/I (84 mg CO 2 per 2 litres of medium, corresponding to 42 mg/I).
The test is considered valid as all validity criteria were met.
% Degradation
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 79
- St. dev.:
- 4.2
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- CO2 determinations:
- 82 and 76% degradation of RS-Pantolactone over 28 d, for the duplicate bottles tested
- more than 60% degradation of RS-Pantolactone was reached within a 10-day window
- more than 25% degradation in the toxicity control within 14 days (56%, based on ThCO2), indicating RS-Pantolactone not to be inhibitory to microbial activity
- no significant degradation of dl-Lactone in the abiotic control and the adsorption control
DOC analyses:
- no significant DOC removal in the abiotic control and the adsorption control (both containing sterilizing agent)
- additional adsorption control (RS-Pantolactone 100 mg/L, inoculum 1000 mg/L ss, no sterilizing agent): 18% DOC removal was observed after 3 hours, resulting from adsorption of RS-Pantolactone by the activated sludge
Since the DOC concentration of day 1 was approximately the same as after 3 hours, no more adsorption of the test item by the activated sludge was observed.
- degradation values in the additional adsorption control, revealed more than 60% biodegradation (79%) within 14 days.
This was in agreement with the biodegradation pattern obtained after CO 2 determinations.
BOD5 / COD results
- Results with reference substance:
- The positive control substance was degraded by at least 60% (67%) within 14 days.
Any other information on results incl. tables
- Table 1: The pH values of the different test media
Sample |
Just before the start of the test: |
On day 28: |
Blank control (A) |
7.5 |
7.5 |
Blank control (B) |
7.5 |
7.5 |
Positive control |
7.5 |
7.8 |
dl-Lactone (A) |
7.5 |
7.5 |
dl-Lactone (B) |
7.5 |
7.5 |
Toxicity control |
7.5 |
7.7 |
Abiotic control |
7.6 |
7.6 |
Adsorption control |
7.6 |
7.6 |
- Table 2: CO2 production and percentage biodegradation of the positive control substance.
Day |
HCL (0.05 N) titrated (mL) |
Produced (mL HCl) |
Produced (mg) |
Cumulative (mg) |
Degradation (1) |
|
Blank |
Positive control |
|||||
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
3 |
39.89 |
18.41 |
21.48 |
23.6 |
23.6 |
27 |
6 |
38.72 |
20.02 |
18.70 |
20.6 |
44.2 |
51 |
8 |
40.96 |
34.88 |
6.08 |
6.7 |
50.9 |
59 |
10 |
40.63 |
36.59 |
4.04 |
4.4 |
55.3 |
64 |
15 |
39.93 |
37.00 |
2.93 |
3.2 |
58.5 |
68 |
20 |
42.19 |
40.20 |
1.99 |
2.2 |
60.7 |
70 |
24 |
41.99 |
43.79 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
60.7 |
70 |
29 |
39.87 |
37.74 |
2.13 |
2.3 |
63.1 |
73 |
29 |
43.92 |
43.65 |
0.27 |
0.3 |
63.4 |
73 |
29 |
45.82 |
45.20 |
0.62 |
0.7 |
64.0 |
74 |
(1): Calculated as the ratio between CO2 produced (cumulative) and the ThCO2 of sodium acetate: 86.7 mg CO2/ 2 L
- Table 3: CO2 production and percentage biodegradation of the test substance (bottle A).
Day |
HCl (0.05 N) titrated (mL) |
Produced (mL HCl) |
Produced (mg) |
Cumulative (mg) |
Degradation (1) |
|
Blank |
bottle A |
|||||
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
3 |
39.89 |
39.45 |
0.44 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1 |
6 |
38.72 |
36.29 |
2.43 |
2.7 |
3.2 |
4 |
8 |
40.96 |
33.88 |
7.08 |
7.8 |
10.9 |
12 |
10 |
40.63 |
23.45 |
17.18 |
18.9 |
29.8 |
34 |
15 |
39.93 |
21.88 |
18.05 |
19.9 |
49.7 |
57 |
20 |
42.19 |
30.63 |
11.56 |
12.7 |
62.4 |
71 |
24 |
41.99 |
36.51 |
5.48 |
6.0 |
68.4 |
78 |
29 |
39.87 |
37.35 |
2.52 |
2.8 |
71.2 |
81 |
29 |
43.92 |
43.23 |
0.69 |
0.8 |
72.0 |
82 |
29 |
45.82 |
45.64 |
0.18 |
0.2 |
72.2 |
82 |
(1): Calculated as the ratio between CO2 produced (cumulative) and the ThCO2 of the test substance: 87.9 mg CO2 / 2 L
- Table 4: CO2 production and percentage biodegradation of the test substance (bottle B).
Day |
HCl (0.05 N) titrated (mL) |
Produced (mL HCl) |
Produced (mg) |
Cumulative (mg) |
Degradation (1) |
|
Blank |
bottle B |
|||||
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
3 |
39.89 |
39.00 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0 |
6 |
38.72 |
38.10 |
0.62 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
1 |
8 |
40.96 |
33.25 |
7.71 |
8.5 |
9.2 |
10 |
10 |
40.63 |
30.06 |
10.57 |
11.6 |
20.8 |
24 |
15 |
39.93 |
19.04 |
20.89 |
23.0 |
43.8 |
50 |
20 |
42.19 |
27.73 |
14.46 |
15.9 |
59.7 |
68 |
24 |
41.99 |
37.58 |
4.41 |
4.9 |
64.5 |
73 |
29 |
39.87 |
37.43 |
2.44 |
2.7 |
67.2 |
76 |
29 |
43.92 |
44.03 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
67.2 |
76 |
29 |
45.82 |
45.91 |
0.00 |
0.0 |
67.2 |
76 |
(1): Calculated as the ratio between CO2 produced (cumulative) and the ThCO2 of the test substance: 87.9 mg CO2 / 2 L
- Table 5: Comparison of biodegradation of the test substance in bottles A and B
Day |
Biodegradation (%) |
|||
Bottle A |
Bottle B |
Mean A and B |
Difference between A and B (1) |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
12 |
10 |
11 |
2 |
10 |
34 |
24 |
29 |
10 |
15 |
57 |
50 |
53 |
7 |
20 |
71 |
68 |
69 |
3 |
24 |
78 |
73 |
76 |
4 |
29 |
81 |
76 |
79 |
5 |
29 |
82 |
76 |
79 |
5 |
29 |
82 |
76 |
79 |
6 |
(1): Absolute difference in biodegradation between bottles A and B
- Table 6: CO2 production and percentage biodegradation of the toxicity control.
Day |
HCl (0.05 N) titrated (mL) |
Produced (mL HCl) |
Produced (mg) |
Cumulative (mg) |
Degradation (1) |
|
Blank (mean) |
toxicity control |
|||||
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
3 |
39.89 |
18.38 |
21.51 |
23.7 |
23.7 |
14 |
6 |
38.72 |
18.08 |
20.64 |
22.7 |
46.4 |
27 |
8 |
40.96 |
19.58 |
21.38 |
23.5 |
69.9 |
40 |
10 |
40.63 |
28.79 |
11.84 |
13.0 |
82.9 |
47 |
15 |
39.93 |
22.92 |
17.01 |
18.7 |
101.6 |
58 |
20 |
42.19 |
30.30 |
11.89 |
13.1 |
114.7 |
66 |
24 |
41.99 |
36.54 |
5.45 |
6.0 |
120.7 |
69 |
29 |
39.87 |
31.56 |
8.31 |
9.1 |
129.8 |
74 |
29 |
43.92 |
41.50 |
2.42 |
2.7 |
132.5 |
76 |
29 |
45.82 |
45.24 |
0.58 |
0.6 |
133.1 |
76 |
(1): Calculated as the ratio between CO2 produced (cumulative) and the sum of the ThCO2 of the test substance and positive control: 174.6 mg CO2/2 L
ThCO2test substance: 87.9 mg CO2/2 L
ThCO2 sodium acetate: 86.7 mg CO2/2 L
- Table 7: CO2 production and percentage biodegradation of the abiotic control.
Day |
HCI (0.05 N) titrated (mL) |
Produced (ml HCl) |
Produced (mg) |
Cumulative (mg) |
Degradation (1) (%) |
|
Blank (mean) |
Abiotic Control |
|||||
OS |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
3 |
39.89 |
44.40 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
6 |
38.72 |
44.06 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
8 |
40.96 |
44.10 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
10 |
40.63 |
43.85 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
15 |
39.93 |
43.76 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
20 |
42.19 |
45.73 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
24 |
41.99 |
44.86 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
29 |
39.87 |
42.33 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
29 |
43.92 |
44.11 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
29 |
45.82 |
46.20 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
1): Calculated as the ratio between CO2 produced (cumulative) and the ThCO2 of the test substance: 87.9 mg CO2 / 2 I Note: No correction was made for the samples obtained for DOC analyses (8 * 30 ml).
A deviation for this volume, maximally 8% on day 29, had no effect on the final degradation value.
- Table 8: CO2 production and percentage biodegradation of the adsorption control.
Day |
HCl (0.05 N) titrated (mL) |
Produced (mL HCl) |
Produced (mg) |
Cumulative (mg) |
Degradation (1) (%) |
|
Blank |
Adsorption |
|||||
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
- |
3 |
39.89 |
45.30 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
6 |
38.72 |
44.51 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
8 |
40.96 |
45.28 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
10 |
40.63 |
43.87 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
15 |
39.93 |
42.74 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
20 |
42.19 |
45.50 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
24 |
41.99 |
44.49 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
29 |
39.87 |
41.52 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0 |
0.00 |
29 |
43.92 |
43.55 |
0.37 |
0.40 |
0 |
0.40 |
29 |
45.82 |
46.38 |
0.00 |
0.40 |
0 |
0.00 |
(1): Calculated as the ratio between CO2 produced (cumulative) and the ThCO2 of the test substance: 87.9 mg CO2 / 2 L
Note: No correction was made for the samples obtained for DOC analyses (8 * 30 ml).
A deviation for this volume, maximally 8% on day 29, had no effect on the final degradation value.
- Table 9: CO2 production in the blank
Day |
HCL (0.05 N) titrated (mL) |
Produced (mL HCl) |
Produced (mg) |
Cumulative (mg) |
|
Ba(OH)2 (1) |
Blank (mean) |
||||
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.0 |
3 |
47.72 |
39.89 |
7.83 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
6 |
48.08 |
38.72 |
9.36 |
10.3 |
18.9 |
8 |
48.31 |
40.96 |
7.35 |
8.1 |
27.0 |
10 |
46.81 |
40.63 |
6.18 |
6.8 |
33.8 |
15 |
47.77 |
39.93 |
7.84 |
8.6 |
42.4 |
20 |
51.51 |
42.19 |
9.33 |
10.3 |
52.7 |
24 |
52.77 |
41.99 |
10.78 |
11.9 |
64.5 |
29 |
49.27 |
39.87 |
9.40 |
10.3 |
74.9 |
29 |
49.07 |
43.92 |
5.15 |
5.7 |
80.5 |
29 |
48.78 |
45.82 |
2.96 |
3.3 |
83.8 |
(1): "Strength" of untreated 0.0125 M Ba(OH)2 solution
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- RS-Pantolactone was readily biodegradable under the conditions of the modified Sturm test presently performed (79 ± 4.2 % degradation within 28 d, > 60 %
wihtin 10 d, based on ThCO2).
Furthermore, no significant elimination of RS-Pantolactone (22 mg/L), by abiotic degradation or adsorption by the activated sludge (30 mg/L ss), was
observed.
At a higher concentration of RS-Pantolactone (100 mg/I) and activated sludge (1000 mg/I ss) 18% adsorption by the activated sludge was observed within 3
hours. Thereafter, no more adsorption of RS-Pantolactone by the activated sludge was observed.
The DOC measurements in the additional adsorption control, revealed more than 60% degradation (79%) within 14 days, which was in agreement with the
biodegradation pattern obtained after CO2 determinations. - Executive summary:
RS-Pantolactone (named dl-Lactone in the study report) was tested for it's 'ready' biodegradability using the carbon dioxide (CO2) evolution test (modified Sturm test). The study procedure was based on EEC directive 92/69, C.4-C, December 1992 and OECD guideline No. 301 B July 17, 1992.
By expert judgement it is concluded that L-Pantolactone is readily biodegradable, too.
The Theoretical CO2 production (ThCO2) of RS-Pantolactone was calculated to be 2.03 mg CO2/mg.
The test item was a white crystalline mass with a purity of 99.6%. RS-Pantolactone was tested in duplicate at 43 mg per 2 litres, corresponding to 12 mg TOC/L. The organic carbon content was based on the molecular formula. Furthermore, an additional adsorption control was prepared at 100 mg RS-Pantolactone/L.
Test set up:
Type of bottle
Determination of CO2 DOC
Inoculum
RS-Pantolactone
(mg/I)Sodium acetate
(mg/I)Sterilizing agent
(HgC12)blank control
X
yes
30 mg/I ss
-
-
-
test bottle
X
yes
30 mg/I ss
22
-
-
positive control
X
yes
30 mg/I ss
-
40
-
toxicity control
X
yes
30 mg/I ss
22
40
-
abiotic control
X X
no
22
-
yes
adsorption control
X X
yes
30 mg/I ss
22
-
yes
additional adsorption control
X
yes
1000 mg/I ss
100
-
-
ss = suspended solids
Since RS-Pantolactone was easily soluble in water the test media were prepared using a stock solution of 1 g/L in milli-RO water. A weighed amount of 1006.7 mg of RS-Pantolactone was dissolved in milli-RO water and made up to 1000 ml. The stock was a clear and colourless solution.
TOC concentration of the stock solution was 542.7 mg/L. This was in the same order of magnitude as the calculated carbon content (55%). Aliquots of 43 ml of the stock solution were added to the test medium, containing the microbial organisms, of test substance bottles A and B, toxicity control, the abiotic control and the adsorption control. An aliquot of 200 ml of the stock solution was added to the test medium of the additional adsorption control, resulting in a final RS-Pantolactone concentration of 100 mg/L. All test solutions were continuously stirred during the test, to ensure optimal contact between the test substance and the test organisms.
Results of CO2 determinations:
The relative degradation values calculated from the measurements performed during the test period revealed 82 and 76% degradation of RS-Pantolactone, for the duplicate bottles tested. Furthermore, more than 60% degradation of RS-Pantolactone was reached within a 10-day window. In the toxicity control more than 25% degradation occurred within 14 days (56%, based on ThCO2). Thus, RS-Pantolactone did not inhibit microbial activity. The relative degradation values calculated from the measurements performed during the test period revealed no significant degradation of RS-Pantolactone in the abiotic control and the adsorption control.
Results of DOC analyses:
No significant DOC removal was observed in the abiotic control and the adsorption control (both containing sterilizing agent). The degradation values calculated from the DOC measurements in the abiotic control and in the adsorption control, revealed no degradation of RS-Pantolactone (both containing sterilizing agent).
In the additional adsorption control (RS-Pantolactone 100 mg/L, inoculum 1000 mg/L ss, no sterilizing agent) 18% DOC removal was observed after 3 hours. This was the result of adsorption of dlLactone by the activated sludge. Since the DOC concentration of day 1 was approximately the same as after 3 hours, no more adsorption of RS-Pantolactone by the activated sludge was observed. The degradation values calculated from the DOC measurements in the additional adsorption control, revealed more than 60% biodegradation (79%) within 14 days. This was in agreement with the biodegradation pattern obtained after CO2 determinations.
Since all criteria for acceptability of the test were met, this study was considered to be valid.
In conclusion, RS-Pantolactone was readily biodegradable under the conditions of the modified Sturm test presently performed.
Furthermore, no significant elimination of RS-Pantolactone (22 mg/L), by abiotic degradation or adsorption by the activated sludge (30 mg/L ss), was observed.
At a higher concentration of RS-Pantolactone (100 mg/L) and activated sludge (1000 mg/L ss) 18% adsorption by the activated sludge was observed within 3 hours. Thereafter, no more adsorption of RS-Pantolactone by the activated sludge was observed.
The DOC measurements in the additional adsorption control, revealed more than 60% biodegradation (79%) within 14 days, which was in agreement with the biodegradation pattern obtained after CO2 determinations.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.