Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 249-060-1 | CAS number: 28510-23-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 13 Jun - 06 Sep 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Study was conducted in accordance with OECD, ISO and EU test guidelines in an accredited GLP laboratory
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 1992
- Deviations:
- yes
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-C (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Carbon Dioxide Evolution Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 2008
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- ISO DIS 9439 (Ultimate Aerobic Biodegradability - Method by Analysis of Released Carbon Dioxide)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 1999
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge: The source of test organisms was activated sludge freshly obtained from a municipal sewage treatment plant: 'Waterschap Aa en Maas', 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, receiving predominantly domestic sewage.- Storage conditions: The freshly obtained sludge was kept under continuous aeration until further treatment. - Preparation of inoculum for exposure: Before use, the sludge was allowed to settle for 36 min and the supernatant liquid was used as inoculum at the amount of 10 mL/L of mineral medium.- Concentration of suspended solids: 4.0 g/L (information from the sewage treatment plant)
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 84 d
- Initial conc.:
- 17 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Initial conc.:
- 12 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: TOC
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS- Composition of medium: Tap-water purified by reverse osmosis (Milli-RO) and subsequently passed over activated carbon and ion-exchange cartridges (Milli-Q) was used to prepare the mineral medium as recommended by OECD guideline 301 B.- Test temperature: 21.7 - 22.7 °C- pH: 7.5 - 7.6- Suspended solids concentration: 40 mg/LTEST SYSTEM- Culturing apparatus: 2 L all-glass brown coloured bottles- Number of culture flasks/concentration: 2 bottles- Method used to create aerobic conditions: CO2-free air was bubbled through the culture vessels at 30 - 100 mL/min- Details of trap for CO2: Three CO2-absorbers (bottles filled with 100 mL 12.5 mM barium hydroxide were connected in series to the exit air line of each test bottle.SAMPLING- Sampling frequency: Titrations were made on days: 2, 5, 7, 9, 14, 19, 23, 27, 34, 41, 48, 55, 62, 69, 83 and 85. Titrations for the positive and toxicity control were made over a period of 14 days. On the 84th day, the pH of all test suspensions was measured and 1 mL of concentrated HCl was added to the bottles of the inoculum blank and test suspension. The bottles were aerated overnight to drive off CO2 present in the test suspension. The final titration was made on day 85.- Sampling method: Each time the CO2-absorber nearest to the test bottle was removed for titration.CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM- Inoculum blank: yes, 2 bottles- Toxicity control: yes, 1 bottle- Reference control: yes, 1 bottle
- Reference substance:
- acetic acid, sodium salt
- Preliminary study:
- Not applicable
- Test performance:
- The temperature recorded in a vessel with water in the same room varied between 21.7 and 22.7°C.The pH of the different test media started at 7.6 by day 75 was 7.5 for all but the positive reference which remained at 7.6
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 31
- Sampling time:
- 27 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Bottle A
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 7
- Sampling time:
- 27 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Bottle B
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 72
- Sampling time:
- 84 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Bottle A
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 76
- Sampling time:
- 84 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: Bottle B
- Details on results:
- - Biodegradation of the test substance of at least 60% was not reached within a 10-day window within 28 days. Thus, the criterion for ready biodegradability was not met.- In the toxicity control more than 25% biodegradation occurred within 14 days (41%, based on ThCO2). Therefore, the test substance was assumed not to inhibit microbial activity.- On day 23 and 27, the difference of duplicate values for % degradation of the test substance was > 20.
- Results with reference substance:
- The reference substance sodium acetate attained 78% degradation within 14 days.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- inherently biodegradable, not fulfilling specific criteria
- Conclusions:
- The relative biodegradation values calculated from the measurements performed during the test revealed 72 and 76% biodegradation of 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate, for A and B, respectively. However, biodegradation of 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate of at least 60% was not reached within a 10-day window within 28 days. Thus, the criterion for ready biodegradability was not met.
- Executive summary:
Determination of ‘ready’ biodegradability: carbon dioxide (CO2) evolution test (modified Sturm test) with 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate (with prolongation up to 84 days, last CO2-measurement on the 85thday).
The study procedures described in this report were based on the OECD guideline No. 301 B, 1992. In addition, the procedures were designed to meet the test methods of the Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 of 30 May 2008, Publication No. L142, Part C.4-C and the ISO International Standard 9439, 1999 and ISO Standard 10634, 1995.
2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate was a clear colourless liquid with a purity of >98% (based on GC-FID area-%). The test substance was tested in duplicate at 17 mg/l, corresponding to 12 mg TOC/l. The organic carbon content was based on the molecular formula. The Theoretical CO2production (ThCO2) of 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate was calculated to be 2.59 mg CO2/mg.
The study consisted of six bottles:
-2 inoculum blanks (no test substance),
-2 test bottles (2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate),
-1 positive control (sodium acetate) and
-1 toxicity control (2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate plus sodium acetate).
Since 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate was not sufficiently soluble to allow preparation of an aqueous solution at a concentration of 1 g/l, weighed amounts were added to the 2-litres test bottles containing medium with microbial organisms and mineral components. To this end, 10 ml of Milli-RO water was added to each weighing bottle containing the test substance. After vigorous mixing (vortex) the resulting suspension was added quantitatively to the test medium. The test solutions were continuously stirred during the test, to ensure optimal contact between the test substance and the test organisms. Test duration was 84 days (last CO2-measurement on the 85thday).
The relative biodegradation values calculated from the measurements performed during the test revealed 72 and 76% biodegradation of 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate, for A and B, respectively. However, biodegradation of 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate of at least 60% was not reached within a 10-day window within 28 days. Thus, the criterion for ready biodegradability was not met.
In the toxicity control, 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate was found not to inhibit microbial activity.
Since all criteria for acceptability of the test were met, this study was considered to be valid.
In conclusion, 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate was designated as not readily biodegradable.
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 17 Feb - 17 Mar 1995
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Original report not available and documentation insufficient for assessment.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- not specified
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: carbon
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS- Aeration of dilution water: Aerated by carbon dioxide free airTEST SYSTEM- Details of trap for CO2: The vessels were vented via sodium hydroxide traps which trapped any carbon dioxide produced. SAMPLING- Sampling frequency: on day 4, 7, 11, 17, 21 and 28
- Reference substance:
- other: sodium acetate
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 63
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- The test substance is not readily biodegradable, but biodegradable under conditions tested. The biodegradation was > 60% within 28 days, but the 10 -day-window was not fulfilled.
- Results with reference substance:
- The reference substance was degraded to 69% by day 11 and to 92% by day 28.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- other: biodegradable
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 06 Jul - 4 Aug 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Study was conducted in accordance to OECD, ISO and EU test guidelines in an accreditied GLP laboratory
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-C (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Carbon Dioxide Evolution Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source of inoculum/activated sludge: Activated sludge was obtained from a municipal sewage treatment plant: "Watershap Aa en Maas", s-Hertogenbosch (The Netherlands), which predominantly treats domestic sewage.- Method of cultivation: The freshly obtained sludge was kept under continuous aeration until further treatment.- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: Before use the sludge was allowed to settle (52 min) and the liquid was decanted for use as inoculum at the amount of 10 mL/L of mineral medium.
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 29 d
- Initial conc.:
- 17 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Initial conc.:
- 12 mg/L
- Based on:
- other: TOC
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS- Composition of medium: according to guideline- Test temperature: 21.8 - 22.5 °C (continuously measured in a vessel with Milli-RO water in the same room)- pH: 7.6 - 8.1 (measured at the start and the end of the test)- pH adjusted: no- Aeration of dilution water: Mineral components, Milli-RO water and inoculum were added to each bottle. This mixture was aerated with synthetic air overnight to purge the system of CO2.- Suspended solids concentration: 4 g/L- Other: Since the test substance was not sufficiently soluble to allow preparations of an aqueous solution at a concentration of 1 g/L, weighed amounts were added to the 2 L test bottles containing medium with microbial organisms and mineral components (test substance: bottle 1: 34.6 mg, bottle 2: 34.1 mg, toxicity control: 34.5 mg). To this end, 20 mL of Milli-RO water was added to each weighing bottle containing the test substance. After vigorous mixing the resulting suspension was added quantitatively to the test medium. The test solutions were continuously stirred during the test.TEST SYSTEM- Culturing apparatus: 2 L all-glass brown coloured bottles- Number of culture flasks/concentration: 2- Method used to create aerobic conditions: A mixture of oxygen (~ 20%) and nitrogen (~ 80%) was passed through a bottle containing 0.5 - 1 L 0.0125 M Ba(OH)2 solution to trap CO2 which might be present in small amounts. The synthetic air was sparged through the scrubbing solutions at a rate of ~ 1-2 bubbles per second (ca. 30-100 mL/min).- Measuring equipment: The amount of CO2 produced was determined by titrating the remaining Ba(OH)2 with 0.05 M standardized HCl (1:20 dilution from 1 M HCl). - Details of trap for CO2 and volatile organics if used: Three CO2-absorbers (bottles filled with 100 mL 0.0125 M Ba(OH)2) were connected in series to the exit air line of each test bottle.- Other: On day 28 the pH of all test suspensions was measured and 1 mL of concentrated HCl (37%) was added to the bottles of the inoculum blank and test suspensions. The bottles were aerated overnight to drive off CO2 present in the test suspensions. The final titration was made on day 29.SAMPLING- Sampling frequency: Titrations were made every second or third day during the first 10 days and thereafter at least every fifth day until the 28th day, for the inoculum blank and test suspensions. Titrations for the positive and toxicity control were made at least 14 days.- Sampling method: Each time the CO2-absorber nearest to the test bottle was removed for titration; each of the remaining two absorbers was moved one position in the direction of the test bottle. A new CO2-absorber was placed at the far end of the series.CONTROL AND BLANK SYSTEM- Inoculum blank: 2- Abiotic sterile control: 2- Toxicity control: 1
- Reference substance:
- acetic acid, sodium salt
- Remarks:
- 12 mg/L as TOC
- Preliminary study:
- Not applicable
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- >= 27 - <= 45
- Sampling time:
- 29 d
- Details on results:
- The test substance was biodegradad significantly (27 and 45%) during the test period. However, since the pass level of 60% biodegradation within 28 days was not reached, the substance is not readily biodegradable according to OECD criteria under the conditions of the test.
- Results with reference substance:
- The reference substance was biodegraded by > 60% (77%) within 14 days.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- inherently biodegradable, not fulfilling specific criteria
- Conclusions:
- The relative biodegradation values calculated from the measurements performed during the test period revealed 27 and 45% biodegradation of 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate , for the duplicate bottles tested. Thus the criterion for ready biodegradability (at least 60% biodegradation within a 10 day window) was not met. In the toxicity control more than 25% biodegradation occurred within 14 days (40% based on the ThCO2). Therefore, the test substance was assumed not to inhibit microbial activity.
- Executive summary:
Determination of ‘ready’ biodegradability: carbon dioxide evolution test (Modified Sturm test) with 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate.
The study procedures were described were based on the OECD test guideline No. 301 B, 1992. In addition, the procedures were designed to meet the test methods of the Commission Regulation (EC) 440/2008 of 30h May 2008, Publication No. L142, Part C.4-C and the ISO international standard 9439, 1990.
2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate was a clear colourless liquid with a purity of at least 98% (based on GC-FID area-%). The test substance was tested in duplicate at 17 mg/L corresponding to 12 TOC/L. the organic carbon content was based on the molecular formula. The Theoretical CO2 production (ThCO2) of 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate was calculated to be 2.59 CO2/mg.
The study consisted of six bottles:
2 inoculum blanks (no test substance)
2 test bottles (2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate.
1 positive control (sodium acetate) and
1 toxicity control (2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate plus sodium acetate).
Since 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate was not sufficiently soluble to allow preparation of an aqueous solution at a concentration of 1 g/l, weighed amounts were added to the 2-litres test bottles containing medium with microbial organisms and mineral components. To this end, 20 ml of Milli-RO water was added to each weighing bottle containing the test substance. After vigorous mixing (vortex) the resulting suspension was added quantitatively to the test medium. The test solutions were continuously stirred during the test, to ensure optimal contact between the test substance and the test organisms. Test duration was 28 days (last CO2-measurement on the 29thday).
The relative biodegradation values calculated from the measurements performed during the test revealed 27 and 45% biodegradation of 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate, for the duplicate bottles tested. Thus the criterion for ready biodegradability (at least 60% biodegradation within a 10 day window) was not met. In the toxicity control 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoat was found not to inhibit microbial activity.
Since all criteria for acceptability of the test were met, this study was considered to be valid.
In conclusion, 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate was designated as not readily biodegradable.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Biodegradation of the test substance in bottles A and B
Day | Bottle A | Bottle B | Mean A/B | Difference A-B |
2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
14 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
19 | 18 | 1 | 10 | 17 |
23 | 25 | 2 | 14 | 23 |
27 | 31 | 7 | 19 | 24 |
34 | 37 | 26 | 32 | 11 |
55 | 60 | 53 | 57 | 7 |
85 | 72 | 76 | 74 | 4 |
Table 1: Percentage biodegradation (measured Carbon Dioxide/Theoretical Carbon Dioxide) of test and reference substance
Day | Test substance [%] | Reference substance [%] |
4 | 0 | 11 |
7 | 8 | 56 |
11 | 25 | 69 |
17 | 51 | 91 |
21 | 46 | 80 |
28 | 63 | 92 |
The theoretical CO2 production of the test substance was calculated to be 2.59 mg CO2/mg.
In the toxicity control more than 25% biodegradation occured withion 14 days (40%, based on ThCO2). Therefore, the test substance is assumed not to inhibit microbial activity.
Table 1: CO2 production and percentage biodegradation of reference, treatment and toxicity control
Treatment | Day | HCl (0.05 N) titrated [mL] | Produced CO2 [mL HCl] | Produced CO2 [mg] | Cumulative CO2 [mg] | Biodegradation [%] | |
Blank (mean) | Positive control | ||||||
reference | 3 | 46.67 | 24.99 | 21.68 | 23.8 | 23.8 | 28 |
6 | 46.45 | 26.04 | 20.41 | 22.5 | 46.3 | 54 | |
8 | 46.19 | 36.61 | 9.58 | 10.5 | 56.8 | 66 | |
10 | 46.89 | 42.07 | 4.82 | 5.3 | 62.1 | 73 | |
14 | 46.09 | 42.42 | 3.67 | 4.0 | 66.2 | 77 | |
Test substance bottle 1/2 | 3 | 46.67 | 45.88/45.36 | 0.79/1.31 | 0.9/1.4 | 0.9/1.4 | 1/2 |
6 | 46.45 | 45.65/44.69 | 0.80/1.76 | 0.9/1.9 | 1.7/3.4 | 2/4 | |
8 | 46.19 | 46.06/46.04 | 0.13/0.15 | 0.1/0.2 | 1.9/3.5 | 2/4 | |
10 | 46.89 | 46.53/44.61 | 0.36/2.28 | 0.4/2.5 | 2.3/6.1 | 3/7 | |
14 | 46.09 | 45.31/45.01 | 0.78/1.08 | 0.9/1.2 | 3.1/7.2 | 4/8 | |
17 | 47.58 | 38.87/43.44 | 8.71/4.14 | 9.6/4.5 | 12.7/11.8 | 14/13 | |
20 | 45.93 | 40.08/38.30 | 5.85/7.63 | 6.4/8.4 | 19.2/20.2 | 21/23 | |
24 | 45.99 | 41.85/38.84 | 4.14/7.15 | 4.6/7.9 | 23.7/28.0 | 26/32 | |
29 | 42.98 | 42.69/35.26 | 0.28/7.72 | 0.3/8.5 | 24.0/36.5 | 27/41 | |
29 | 46.13 | 45.98/43.71 | 0.15/2.42 | 0.2/2.7 | 24.2/39.2 | 27/44 | |
29 | 47.24 | 46.96/46.53 | 0.28/0.71 | 0.3/0.8 | 24.5/40.0 | 27/45 | |
Toxicity control | 3 | 46.67 | 24.70 | 21.97 | 24.2 | 24.2 | 14 |
6 | 46.45 | 27.42 | 19.03 | 20.9 | 45.1 | 26 | |
8 | 46.19 | 36.65 | 9.54 | 10.5 | 55.6 | 32 | |
10 | 46.89 | 41.17 | 5.72 | 6.3 | 61.9 | 35 | |
14 | 46.09 | 39.01 | 7.08 | 7.8 | 69.7 | 40 |
Description of key information
Inherently biodegradable, not fulfilling specific criteria: >20% CO2 evolution in 28 days (OECD 301B) and 74% CO2 evolution in 85 days (OECD 301B)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- inherently biodegradable, not fulfilling specific criteria
Additional information
2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate (CAS No. 28510-23-8) is not readily biodegradable according to OECD criteria. Based on one GLP study according to OECD 301B a degradation of ≥ 20% after 28 days can be assumed (Desmares-Koopmans, 2010). As stated in ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, Chapter 7b, p 180 “Biodegradation above 20% of theoretical (measured as BOD, DOC removal or COD) may be regarded as evidence of inherent, primary biodegradability.” Therefore, 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate (CAS No. 28510-23-8) can be regarded as inherently biodegradable, not fulfilling specific criteria.
Another GLP study according to OECD 301B was prolonged up to 85 days (Desmares-Koopmans, 2012). In this study the pass level (60% CO2 evolution) was reached between days 62 to 69. In both tests (Desmares-Koopmans, 2010; 2012), a prolonged lag phase of 14 days or longer was shown before degradation of the test substance started. The toxicity controls showed that no inhibition of aquatic microorganisms occurred. Based on these two tests, it can be assumed, that microorganisms need to adapt their enzymes in order to degrade 2,2-dimethylpropane-1,3-diyl 2-ethylhexanoate (CAS No. 28510-23-8). Nevertheless once these are adjusted, good overall degradation rates can be achieved (overall degradability after 85 days = 74%). Therefore in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006, the substance is regarded as not persistent (not P).
Due to the high overall degradation rates as observed in the enhanced biodegradation test (Desmares-Koopmans, 2012) ultimate and complete degradation can be assumed for this substance. Consequently, further simulation testing for water and sediment or soil biodegradation tests are not necessary.
A detailed reference list is provided in the technical dossier (see IUCLID, section 13) and within the CSR.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.