Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Toxicological and pharmacological effects of gadolinium and samarium chlorides
Author:
T. J. Haley, K. Raymond, N. Komesu, and H. C. Upham
Year:
1961
Bibliographic source:
Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1961 December; 17(3): 526–532.

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Samarium (III) chloride hexahydrate
EC Number:
233-797-0
EC Name:
Samarium (III) chloride hexahydrate
Cas Number:
10361-82-7
Molecular formula:
Cl3Sm
IUPAC Name:
samarium (III) chloride hexahydrate
Details on test material:
- purity 99%

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
Each rabbit had one eye exposed to 1 mg of crystals of samarium chloride, while the other eye served as a control.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single treatment
Observation period (in vivo):
24 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3

Results and discussion

Any other information on results incl. tables

The introduction of 1 mg of samarium chlorides into the conjunctival sac of the eyes of rabbits resulted in an immediate increase in the rate of blinking and a redness of the palpebral coujunctiva within 1 hr.

After 24 hr there was no evidence of corneal or iris damage, conjunctival irritation, chemosis or increased lacrimal discharge. Apparently the natural buffering capacity of the lacrimal Huid was suflicient to counteract the nascent hydrochloric acid released when the gadolinium or samarium chlorides dissolved in the tears.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
slightly irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information