Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Exposure related observations in humans: other data

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
exposure-related observations in humans: other data
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
documentation insufficient for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Further studies on sensory response to certain industrial solvent vapors
Author:
L. Silverman, H.F. Schulte and M.W. First
Year:
1946
Bibliographic source:
Ind. Hyg. Toxicol.

Materials and methods

Type of study / information:
- highest concentration which majority of subjects estimated satisfactory for 3-hour exposure
- concentration of vapor which irritated majority of subjects
- suggested maximum allowable concentration
Endpoint addressed:
respiratory irritation
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline required
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,5,5-trimethylcyclohex-2-enone
EC Number:
201-126-0
EC Name:
3,5,5-trimethylcyclohex-2-enone
Cas Number:
78-59-1
Molecular formula:
C9H14O
IUPAC Name:
3,5,5-trimethylcyclohex-2-enone

Method

Ethical approval:
not specified
Details on study design:
- An average number of twelve subjects of both sexes were used.
- The time of exposure was 15 minutes.
- During the 15 minute exposure period, motion pictures were shown to occupy the subjects' attention and divert their thoughts from the atmospheric contamination to which they were exposed.
Exposure assessment:
not specified

Results and discussion

Results:
25 ppm will produce irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat in human subjects. The majority of subjects were not uncomfortable at 10 pppm. 70% of the subjects objected to the odor at 25 ppm, and only 40% objected to the odor at 10 ppm. The test substance has an odor strongly resembling camphor.

Applicant's summary and conclusion