Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Acute Oral: In a study performed according OECD TG 423 the LD50 value is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw after single oral administration in female rats (reference 7.2.1-1).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
January 22, 2019 - February 26, 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Version / remarks:
2001
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Remarks:
Crl:WI (Han)
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River GmbH, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: mean 163 g
- Fasting period before study: yes
- Housing: single-housed in type III Makrolon cages with shelter
- Diet: ad libitum, maintenance diet (V1534, ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, Germany)
- Water: ad libitum, tap water
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22.3-23.1
- Humidity (%): 42.2-58.1
- Air changes (per hr): fully air-conditioned room
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
other: 0.25% aqueous hydroxypropylcellulose (Methocel)
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Amount of vehicle: 200 g/L

MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 mL/kg

CLASS METHOD
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: Due to the chemical properties of the test item, mortality was not expected at the highest starting dose of 2000 mg/kg. Therefore, the treatment was started with 2000 mg/kg in three female rats and continued with further three females at 2000 mg/kg.
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: All animals were weighted before treatment (day 1) and on day 2,4,6,8,11,13 and 15
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Clinical signs: On day of treatment, each animal was observed for mortality and for symptoms of intoxication. On the following days, the rats were examined once daily.
Statistics:
none
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
>= 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No mortality was seen.
Clinical signs:
other: No clinical signs of toxicity were observed.
Gross pathology:
No organ alterations were identified during the gross pathological examination.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The LD50 value is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw after single oral administration in female rats.
Executive summary:

The objective of the present study was to identify potential toxic effects of the test item after single oral administration to rats in a stepwise procedure. The treatment was started with 2000 mg/kg in 3 female rats and continued with further 3 females treated with 2000 mg/kg bw. Mortality and clinical signs were monitored for at least 6 hours after administration and then daily. All animals were weighed before treatment (day 1) and on days 2, 4, 6, 8, 11,13 and 15. At the end of the observation period, all surviving rats were sacrificed and subjected to a detailed necropsy. No mortality occurred during the course of this study. No clinical signs of toxicity were observed. The body weight development was inconspicuous throughout the study. The gross pathological examination revealed no organ alterations. Based on this, the test item has no acute toxic potential under the conditions of the present study, and the LD50 value is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw after single oral administration in female rats.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
discriminating dose
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
OECD TG 423, GLP

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Acute oral

A study according OECD TG 423 was performed to identify potential toxic effects of the test item after single oral administration to rats in a stepwise procedure. The treatment was started with 2000 mg/kg in 3 female rats and continued with further 3 females treated with 2000 mg/kg bw.

Mortality and clinical signs were monitored for at least 6 hours after administration and then daily. All animals were weighed before treatment (day 1) and on days 2, 4, 6, 8. 11. 13 and 15. At the end of the observation period, all surviving rats were sacrificed and subjected to a detailed necropsy.

No mortality occurred during the course of this study. No clinical signs of toxicity were observed. The body weight development was inconspicuous throughout the study. The gross pathological examination revealed no organ alterations.

Based on this, the test item has no acute toxic potential under the conditions of the present study, and the LD50 value is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw after single oral administration in female rats (reference 7.2.1-1).

Justification for classification or non-classification

Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008

The available data for acute oral toxicity are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on this data, the substance is not classified for acute toxicity under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP), as amended for the twelfth time in Regulation (EU) 2019/521.