Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-491-9 | CAS number: 96-23-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
1,3 -Dichloropropanol has been found to be mutagenic in numerous strains of Salmonella typhimurium in the Ames test (Ziegler et al; Hahn et al), further in vitro testing was not conducted.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- The study
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- purchased from Aldrich chemical
Label purity 95%
analysed purity 94% - Target gene:
- HIstidine loci
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 97
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 fraction
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0 to 6666 µg/plate- The substance was initially tested in half log dose intervals upto the dose that elcited toxicity in the initial toxicity screen. At least 5 doses were tested in tripplicate.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine TA98 without metabolic activation; 2-aminoanthracene all strains with metabolic activaiton
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Cultures were grown overnight with shaking at 37°C in Oxoid No. 2 broth, and their phenotypes were analyzed prior to their use for mutagenicity assays.
Preparation of Liver S-9 Fractions The S-9 (9,OOOg supernatant) fractions of Aroclor 1254-induced, male Sprague- Dawley rat and male Syrian hamster livers were prepared. The S-9 mixes were prepared immediately prior to use and contained 10% S-9; The substance was tested in the absence of metabolic activation and with rat and hamster S-9 fractions.
A preincubation assay was performed . The test chemical (0.05 ml), Salmonella culture (0.10 ml), and S-9 mix or buffer (0.50 ml) were incubated at 37"C, without shaking, for 20 min. Chemicals known or suspected to be volatile were incubated in capped tubes. The top agar was added and the contents of the tubes were mixed and poured onto the surface of petri dishes containing Vogel-Bonner medium. The histidine-independent (his') colonies arising on these plates were counted following two days incubation at 37°C. Plates were machine counted (New Brunswick, Edison, NJ; Artek, Farmingdale, NY) unless precipitate was present which interfered with the count, or the color of the test chemical on the plate reduced the contrast between the colonies and the background agar. At the discretion of the investigators, plates with low numbers of colonies were counted by hand.
1) Testing in strains TA97, TA98, TA100, and TA1535, 10% S-9 was used. 2) The first test of a chemical was without activation and with 10% S-9 in the S-9 mix. If a positive result was obtained the test was repeated. If the tests were negative they were repeated without S-9 and with 30% S-9. 3) The order of use of 10% and 30% S-9 was reversed. 4) Initial testing was in strains TA98 and TA100 without activation and with 30% rat and hamster S-9s. If a positive result was obtained in one of these two strains it was repeated and the other strains were not used. If the tests were negative, the other strains were used with 30% and 10% S-9. A chemical was not designated nonmutagenic unless it had been tested in strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA97 and/or TA1537, without activation and with 10% and 30% rat and hamster $9. Occasionally, 5% S-9 was also used in all protocol variations.
All chemicals were tested initially in a toxicity assay to determine the appropri- ate dose range for the mutagenicity assay. The toxicity assay was performed using TA1OO. Toxic concentrations were those that produced a decrease in the number of his+ colonies, or a clearing in the density of the background lawn, or both. - Rationale for test conditions:
- Standard for the reverese mutation assay
- Evaluation criteria:
- Evaluations were made at both the individual trial and overall chemical levels. Individual trials were judged mutagenic (+), weakly mutagenic (+ W), questionable (?), or nonmutagenic (-), depending on the magnitude of the increase of his+ revertants, and the shape of the dose-response. A trial was considered questionable (?) if the dose-response was judged insufficiently high to support a call of “ +W,” if only a single dose was elevated over the control, or if the increase seen was not dose related. During the study the standard evaluaiton critieria fro a positive result were not applied: 3 fold increase overcurrent solvent control for TA1535 and TA97 and 2 fold increase over solvent control for TA 98, TA100. Thes ehave been applied in the current analysis.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 97
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 97
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Based upon the positive responses observed in all four strains tested, it can be concluded that the substance is a potential mutagen.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only 2 strains (TA100 and TA 1535 used), No plate incorporation assay conducted.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Data from openliterature study
- Target gene:
- histidne loci
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1-62.8 µmol/plate (TA100)
1-78.6 µmol/plate (TA 1535) - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
The 30-min preincubation test was performed according to Maron and Ames
using S~ typhimurium strain TA100 and strain TA1535, kindly provided by Professor B.N. Ames, with and without addition of
S9 mix (30.5 mg protein ml-1) prepared from livers of Wistar rats pretreated
with arochlor. The mean values of at least
two independent duplicate determinations were calculated. Differences in colony
counts were in all cases less than 20%. Colonies were counted using a Biotran
III automatic colony counter. The substances were dissolved in dimethyl sulphoxide
(10 µl). The average number of spontaneous revertants per plate was 190 for
strain TA100 and 22 for TA1535. 660 revertants per µg NaN3 per plate were
determined in the positive control for strain TA100 and 600 for TA1535. 1161
revertants per plate were obtained as positive control in the presence of S9 mix
with 2-aminoanthracene (1 µg per plate).- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Exposure of TA100 and TA1535 strains of salmonella to the substance results in a clear positive result in the reverse mutaiton assay.
Referenceopen allclose all
Dose |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA97 |
TA98 |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
no S9 |
Hamster S9 |
Rat S9 |
no S9 |
Hamster S9 |
Rat S9 |
no S9 |
Hamster S9 |
Rat S9 |
no S9 |
Hamster S9 |
Rat S9 |
||||||||||||
µg/plate |
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
Mean |
SEM |
0 |
133 |
9.1 |
89 |
1.5 |
125 |
4 |
27 |
4.4 |
9 |
2.9 |
11 |
2.5 |
132 |
6.6 |
150 |
11.5 |
184 |
12.7 |
15 |
0.9 |
28 |
3.4 |
26 |
1.2 |
100 |
147 |
4.7 |
177 |
3.5 |
139 |
3.8 |
28 |
4.2 |
27 |
1.5 |
14 |
1.3 |
126 |
1.5 |
148 |
3.1 |
174 |
9.7 |
17 |
3.3 |
32 |
3.8 |
31 |
2.1 |
333 |
182 |
7.2 |
359 |
11.8 |
173 |
21.5 |
59 |
5.5 |
34 |
2.4 |
23 |
3.3 |
140 |
4.9 |
151 |
10.7 |
183 |
13.2 |
17 |
3.8 |
31 |
2.8 |
28 |
3.2 |
1000 |
272 |
7.5 |
725 |
13.5 |
247 |
20.9 |
195 |
12.8 |
218 |
18.9 |
59 |
7.9 |
138 |
10.5 |
259 |
11.7 |
209 |
4.4 |
19 |
4.2 |
39 |
0.6 |
40 |
6.2 |
3333 |
511 |
15.1 |
1936 |
30.7 |
545 |
9.4 |
517 |
12.6 |
525 |
12.7 |
236 |
15.8 |
151 |
11.8 |
485 |
10 |
227 |
8.7 |
23 |
4 |
59 |
3.1 |
37 |
1.5 |
6666 |
934 |
9.9 |
2350 |
18.5 |
852 |
34.4 |
828 |
12.9 |
734 |
29.6 |
324 |
9.2 |
148 |
7 |
749 |
12.2 |
265 |
3.5 |
20 |
1.5 |
64 |
3.3 |
49 |
7.2 |
POS |
521 |
10.7 |
446 |
25.7 |
801 |
34.9 |
336 |
16.2 |
43 |
3.1 |
176 |
13.3 |
238 |
16.2 |
293 |
10.3 |
1438 |
46.7 |
157 |
9.6 |
143 |
9.4 |
247 |
8 |
The results of the mutagenicity testing of 1,3-DCP-OH with S. typhimurium TA100 in the 30-min preincubation assay are shown in Table I. There are no significant differences between the results obtamed with and without addition of the metabolizing enzymes S9 mix or two different concentrations of ADH and cofactor NAD +. In order to examine whether the ADH present in S9 mix could cause activation, we added the cofactor NAD ÷ instead of NADP ÷ to S9 in an additional set of experiments (Table I). Here too no significant differences were observed. When using the S. typhimurium test strain TA1535 (Table II) a clear decrease in revertants was observed after addition of $9 mix or $9 mix and ADH whereas
addition of ADH and cofactor NAD ÷ without S9 mix did not influence the revertant numbers. In principle, an activating effect by ADH is possible and could be demonstrated with 2-chloropropenol. We have recently shown that 2-chloropropenol is metabolically transformed to 2-chloropropenal, an extremely strong mutagen . A comparison of the mutagenicity of 1,3-dichloroacetone and 1,3-DCP-OH shows that 1,3-dichloroacetone possesses a much higher activity than 1,3-DCP-OH. We found 23 875 revertants/#mol for 1,3-dichloroacetone in strain TA100 and 1137 in strain TA1535 but only about 33 revertants for 1,3-DCP-OH in both strains. Therefore activation should be
also expected if ADH converts 1,3-DCP-OH to 1,3-dichloroacetone. An activation by ADH and cofactors was, however, not observed in this case. In further mutagenicity studies we investigated the influence of the incubation time and whether preincubation of 1,3-DCP-OH without bacteria, in analogy to the SOS chromotest (see later), also leads to activation. A 90-min preincubation without S9 mix resulted only in marginally higher mutagenicity than was obtained with a 30-min preincubation. An additional incubation of the substance without bacteria for 30 min before the 90 rain preincubation with bacteria had also practically no effect.
TABLE I MUTAGENICITY OF 1,3-DCP-OH IN S. TYPHIMURIUM TA100 WITH AND WITHOUT S9 MIX AND WITH ADH IN REVERTANTS/PLATE AFTER 30-MIN PREINCUBATION
µmol/plate | -S9 | +S9 NADP+ | +S9 NAD+ | ADH + NAD+ 5µl | ADH +NAD+ 50µl |
1 | 239 | 258 | 245 | 224 | 210 |
2.6 | 241 | 281 | 281 | 248 | 282 |
5.2 | 323 | 375 | 326 | 324 | 358 |
7.9 | 351 | 441 | 379 | 371 | 360 |
10.5 | 418 | 480 | 418 | 431 | 395 |
15.7 | 484 | 559 | 473 | 499 | 504 |
26.2 | 630 | 696 | 589 | 689 | 609 |
36.7 | 793 | 843 | |||
52.4 | 818 | 889 | 812 | 792 | 796 |
62.8 | 827 | 743 | 822 | 781 | 835 |
TABLE II MUTAGENICITY OF 1,3-DCP-OH IN S. TYPHIMURIUM TA1535 WITH OR WITHOUT ADDITION OF THE METABOLIZING ENZYMES $9 MIX OR ADH IN REVERTANTS/PLATE AFTER 30 MIN PREINCUBATION
µmol/plate | -S9 | +S9 NADP+ | ADH + NAD+ 5µl | ADH +NAD+ 50µl |
1 | 69 | 33 | 40 | |
2.6 | 119 | 56 | 63 | 114 |
5.6 | 222 | 88 | 85 | 227 |
7.9 | 305 | 137 | 144 | 295 |
10.5 | 317 | 137 | 168 | 328 |
26.2 | 506 | 277 | 278 | 503 |
52.4 | 631 | 435 | 402 | 607 |
62.8 | 366 | 431 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Subsequent to the positive results found in the Ames test, standard somatic testing in mouse bone marrow erythrocytes did not demonstrate genotoxic potential.Similarly no genotoxic potential was found in a Drosophila spp wing spot test. A COMET assay conducted by oral gavage in mice found a positive dose dependant indication of genotoxicity in the glandular stomach. This is indicative of a reactive, point of contact genotoxin which is not available for systemic exposure.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian cell study: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 489 (In vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian comet assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- B6C3F1
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Age 8-10 weeks
body weight 20-35 g
supplier Taconic NIEHS colony
Food: Purina Certified 5002 Pelleted Diet, ad libitum
Housed singly
Temperature 18-26 celsius
relative humidity 30%
Light period 600-1800 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- 0.9% w/v saline
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: prepared in 0.9 % saline
at 2.5mg/ml, 5 mg/ml and 10 mg/ml - Frequency of treatment:
- single dose
- Post exposure period:
- 72 hours
- Dose / conc.:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 (five)
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- ethyl methanesulfonate 150 mg/kg/day
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- blood; colon; liver,left lobe; glandular stomach
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- tissues were lysed overnight and DNA samples prepared on Trevigen slides in 0.5% agarose. The DNA was unwound for 20 minutes at a pH of 13.2. Electrophoresis : 25V, 300 mA starting current at 28% relative humidity/21C temperature in a GTX5 COMET electophoresis system. DNA stained with SYBR gold stain.
- Evaluation criteria:
- COMET tails assessed using Perceptive Instruments software verison 4.11
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Toxicity:
- not examined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: glandular stomach
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not examined
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: blood, colon, left liver lobe
- Additional information on results:
- All assessments were completed based on COMET tail length.
- Conclusions:
- A significant increase in COMET tail length was observed in the glandular stomachs of male mice treated by oral gavage with the substance; the increase had a significant linear trend. Significant dose dependant increases in tail length were not observed in the other tissues tested. The investigator concluded that the substance was genotoxic in the glandular stomach, indicating a point of contact, rather than systemic genotoxin.
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian cell study: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CB6F1
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Age 8-10 weeks
body weight 20-35 g
supplier Taconic NIEHS colony
Food: Purina Certified 5002 Pelleted Diet, ad libitum
Housed singly
Temperature 18-26 celsius
relative humidity 30%
Light period 600-1800 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- 0.9% saline
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: prepared in 0.9 % saline
at 2.5mg/ml, 5 mg/ml and 10 mg/ml - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 72 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- single
- Dose / conc.:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 (five)
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- 150 mg/kg ethyl methane sulfonate
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow erythrocytes
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- 1,3-dichloropropan-2-ol did not induce any micronuclei in the femur bone marrow of male B6C3F1 mice at 25-100 mg/kg bw when examined using the OECD 474 test guideline
Referenceopen allclose all
Mean COMET tail lengths in tested tissues
Dose Level | COMET tail length mean | COMET tail length (SEM) | pairwise P value | Organ | Pairwise Test |
Vehicle Control | 26.52 | 0.85 | Blood | ||
Low Dose | 29.45 | 0.82 | 0.154 | Blood | Williams |
Mid Dose | 26.21 | 0.93 | 0.186 | Blood | Williams |
High Dose | 30.36 | 0.91 | 0.004 | Blood | Williams |
Positive Control | 58.20 | 2.31 | 0.005 | Blood | Dunn |
Vehicle Control | 44.88 | 2.68 | Colon | ||
Low Dose | 46.94 | 3.23 | 0.384 | Colon | Williams |
Mid Dose | 45.36 | 2.88 | 0.452 | Colon | Williams |
High Dose | 50.18 | 3.59 | 0.164 | Colon | Williams |
Positive Control | 65.58 | 5.11 | 0.004 | Colon | Williams |
Vehicle Control | 56.12 | 2.26 | Liver | ||
Low Dose | 60.19 | 3.00 | 0.781 | Liver | Williams |
Mid Dose | 43.21 | 2.13 | 0.857 | Liver | Williams |
High Dose | 57.18 | 3.01 | 0.493 | Liver | Williams |
Positive Control | 71.95 | 2.25 | 0.001 | Liver | Williams |
Vehicle Control | 42.69 | 2.03 | Stomach | ||
Low Dose | 64.31 | 4.92 | 0.038 | Stomach | Williams |
Mid Dose | 66.35 | 10.15 | 0.032 | Stomach | Williams |
High Dose | 75.73 | 11.37 | 0.006 | Stomach | Williams |
Positive Control | 84.25 | 6.99 | 0.000 | Stomach | Williams |
Test for linear trend:
Colon | LinearTrend | 0.138105 |
Blood | LinearTrend | 0.030227 |
Stomach | LinearTrend | 0.007354 |
Liver | LinearTrend | 0.629107 |
Blood | |||||||||||
Start Date | Sample Collection Time | Sex | Methodology Used | Route | Dosing Regimen | ||||||
23/09/2008 | 28 hour | Male | Flow Cytometry | Gavage | Gavage x 4, 4 day | ||||||
Dose | Animal | Polychromatic Erythrocytes | Normochromatic Erythrocytes | ||||||||
(mg/kg) | Number | Trend P: 0.9057418632200795 | Trend P: 0.5630751976468024 | ||||||||
No. Examined | Total MN Cells | Percent PCE | MN Cells | No. Examined | Total MN Cells | Percent NCE | MN Cells | ||||
per 1000 | per 1000 | ||||||||||
Vehicle Control | Saline | 0 | 1 | 20000 | 62 | 1.4 | 3.1 | 1428487 | 2095 | 98.6 | 1.5 |
0 | 2 | 20000 | 57 | 1.1 | 2.9 | 1724165 | 2304 | 98.9 | 1.3 | ||
0 | 3 | 20000 | 49 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 1522067 | 2273 | 98.7 | 1.5 | ||
0 | 4 | 20000 | 51 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 1389274 | 2125 | 98.6 | 1.5 | ||
0 | 5 | 20000 | 54 | 1.2 | 2.7 | 1669659 | 2434 | 98.8 | 1.5 | ||
Average ± SEM | 1.285 ± 0.053 | 2.730 ± 0.115 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 1.457 ± 0.033 | |||||||
Test Chemical | 1,3-Dichloro-2-propanol | 25 | 10 | 20000 | 44 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1201091 | 1817 | 98.4 | 1.5 |
25 | 6 | 20000 | 52 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 1437928 | 2142 | 98.6 | 1.5 | ||
25 | 7 | 20000 | 48 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 1576941 | 2422 | 98.7 | 1.5 | ||
25 | 8 | 20000 | 40 | 1.3 | 2 | 1543362 | 2215 | 98.7 | 1.4 | ||
25 | 9 | 20000 | 62 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 1482301 | 2267 | 98.7 | 1.5 | ||
Average ± SEM | 1.375 ± 0.069 | 2.460 ± 0.189 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 1.501 ± 0.018 | |||||||
Pairwise P | 0.817 | 0.349 | |||||||||
Test Chemical | 1,3-Dichloro-2-propanol | 50 | 11 | 20000 | 45 | 1.3 | 2.3 | 1549017 | 2174 | 98.7 | 1.4 |
50 | 12 | 20623 | 41 | 1.2 | 2 | 1662551 | 2475 | 98.8 | 1.5 | ||
50 | 13 | 20000 | 38 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1769073 | 2455 | 98.9 | 1.4 | ||
50 | 14 | 20000 | 49 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 1475861 | 2145 | 98.7 | 1.5 | ||
50 | 15 | 20000 | 62 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 1222994 | 1825 | 98.4 | 1.5 | ||
Average ± SEM | 1.313 ± 0.082 | 2.338 ± 0.214 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 1.445 ± 0.021 | |||||||
Pairwise P | 0.885 | 0.415 | |||||||||
Test Chemical | 1,3-Dichloro-2-propanol | 100 | 16 | 20000 | 56 | 1 | 2.8 | 1903261 | 2781 | 99 | 1.5 |
100 | 17 | 20000 | 37 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1757290 | 2554 | 98.9 | 1.5 | ||
100 | 18 | 20000 | 46 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 2494753 | 3909 | 99.2 | 1.6 | ||
100 | 19 | 20000 | 61 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 2391448 | 3396 | 99.2 | 1.4 | ||
100 | 20 | 20000 | 33 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 2220912 | 3186 | 99.1 | 1.4 | ||
Average ± SEM | 0.936 ± 0.063 | 2.330 ± 0.268 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 1.467 ± 0.026 | |||||||
Pairwise P | 0.909 | 0.443 | |||||||||
Positive Control | Ethyl Methane Sulfonate | 150 | 21 | 20000 | 177 | 1 | 8.9 | 2020359 | 3163 | 99 | 1.6 |
150 | 22 | 20000 | 147 | 1.2 | 7.4 | 1637685 | 2642 | 98.8 | 1.6 | ||
150 | 23 | 20000 | 235 | 1.1 | 11.8 | 1806498 | 3315 | 98.9 | 1.8 | ||
150 | 24 | 20000 | 234 | 1.2 | 11.7 | 1718822 | 2967 | 98.8 | 1.7 | ||
150 | 25 | 20000 | 203 | 1 | 10.2 | 1947659 | 3185 | 99 | 1.6 | ||
Average ± SEM | 1.090 ± 0.042 | 9.960 ± 0.846 | 0.000 ± 0.000 | 1.675 ± 0.048 | |||||||
Pairwise P | 0.005 | 0.003 | |||||||||
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
The weight of evidence presented by the results of the Ames studies (positive in a number of strains of S.typhimurium) indicate that the substance does have mutagenic potential. However, the negative somatic mouse micronucleus study and negative findings in the somatic tissues in the mouse COMET assay indictate that there is negiligible concern that the substance is a Germ Cell mutagen. The positive findings in the mouse glandular stomach following oral dosing indicate that there is a point mutagen potential; in conjunction with the known carcinogenic properties of the substance, it is therefore recommended that the substance be classified as Germ Cell Mutagen Category 2 in accordance with the criteria set out in 1272/2008/EC.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.