Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Boiling point

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
boiling point
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
2013
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
QSAR prediction: migrated from IUCLID 5.6
1. SOFTWARE

2. MODEL (incl. version number)

3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
- Input used in model prediction - SMILES: CCCCCCCCCCCCCCOC(=O)C(C)O
- Other identifiers: CAS number: 1323-03-1, EC number: 215-350-1, Chemical name: Tetradecyl lactate, Structural formula: C17H34O3, InChI: InChI=1/C17H34O3/c1-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12-13-14-15-20-17(19)16(2)18/h16,18H,3-15H2,1-2H3

4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
[Explain how the model fulfils the OECD principles for (Q)SAR model validation. Consider attaching the QMRF or providing a link]
- Defined endpoint:
- Unambiguous algorithm:
- Defined domain of applicability:
- Appropriate measures of goodness-of-fit and robustness and predictivity:
- Mechanistic interpretation:

5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
[Explain how the substance falls within the applicability domain of the model]
- Descriptor domain:
- Structural and mechanistic domains:
- Similarity with analogues in the training set:
- Other considerations (as appropriate):

6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
[Explain how the prediction fits the purpose of classification and labelling and/or risk assessment]
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Calculation based on MPBPWIN (v1.43)
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
other: QSAR Estimation Adapted Stein and Brown Method
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Not applicable
Boiling pt.:
358.49 °C
Atm. press.:
1 atm
Decomposition:
no

MPBPWIN (v1.43) Program Results:

===============================

Experimental Database Structure Match: no data

 

SMILES : O=C(OCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)C(O)C

CHEM   : 1323 -03 -1

MOL FOR: C17 H34 O3

MOL WT : 286.46

------------------------ SUMMARY MPBPWIN v1.43 --------------------

Boiling Point: 358.49 deg C (Adapted Stein and Brown Method)

Endpoint:
boiling point
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
2014
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
QSAR prediction: migrated from IUCLID 5.6

1. SOFTWARE

2. MODEL (incl. version number)

3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL

4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
[Explain how the model fulfils the OECD principles for (Q)SAR model validation. Consider attaching the QMRF or providing a link]
- Defined endpoint:
- Unambiguous algorithm:
- Defined domain of applicability:
- Appropriate measures of goodness-of-fit and robustness and predictivity:
- Mechanistic interpretation:

5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
[Explain how the substance falls within the applicability domain of the model]
- Descriptor domain:
- Structural and mechanistic domains:
- Similarity with analogues in the training set:
- Other considerations (as appropriate):

6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
[Explain how the prediction fits the purpose of classification and labelling and/or risk assessment]
The boiling process of this product is expected to occur over a range of temperatures between 280 and 360 °C.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Data provided by QSAR Toolbox
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
other: QSAR
Boiling pt.:
> 280 - < 360 °C
Atm. press.:
1
Remarks on result:
other: The substance is an UVCB with various constituents and thus exhibits boiling over a temperature range instead an exact boiling point.

Boiling point of tetradecyllactate estimated using the Adapted Stein and Brown Method:

CAS

NAME

Molecular formula

Data

Press.

atm.

1323-03-1

tetradecyl lactate

C17H34O3

358 °C

1

Boiling points of tetradecanol available from QSAR Toolbox/SIDS:

CAS

NAME

Molecular formula

Data

Press.

atm.

112-72-1

myristyl alcohol; tetradecanol; 1-tetradecanol

C14H30O

289 °C

1

Conclusions:
The boiling process of this product is expected to occur over a range of temperatures between 280 and 360 °C.

Endpoint:
boiling point
Type of information:
other: SDS
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
2011
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Value originates from the SDS of CERAPHYL 50.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Principle of test: Determination of the melting/freezing point
- Short description of test conditions: not specified
- Parameters analysed / observed: not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Boiling pt.:
325 °C
Atm. press.:
1 atm

Description of key information

As the reaction product contains tetradecyl lactate and tetradecanol, the estimated boiling point is the average of the boiling point range of 280 to 360 °C.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Boiling point at 101 325 Pa:
320 °C

Additional information