Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-027-3 | CAS number: 131-54-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Density
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- density, other
- Remarks:
- prediction of density in g/cm³
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2018-05-29
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
T.E.S.T. (Toxicity Estimation Software Tool) version 4.2
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
Hierarchical method
The toxicity for a given query compound is estimated using the weighted average of the predictions from several different models. The different models are obtained by using Ward’s method to divide the training set into a series of structurally similar clusters. A genetic algorithm based technique is used to generate models for each cluster. The models are generated prior to runtime.
FDA method
The prediction for each test chemical is made using a new model that is fit to the chemicals that are most similar to the test compound. Each model is generated at runtime.
Single model method
Predictions are made using a multilinear regression model that is fit to the training set (using molecular descriptors as independent variables) using a genetic algorithm based approach. The regression model is generated prior to runtime.
Group contribution method
Predictions are made using a multilinear regression model that is fit to the training set (using molecular fragment counts as independent variables). The regression model is generated prior to runtime.
Nearest neighbor method
The predicted toxicity is estimated by taking an average of the 3 chemicals in the training set that are most similar to the test chemical.
Consensus method
The predicted toxicity is estimated by taking an average of the predicted toxicities from the above QSAR methods (provided the predictions are within the respective applicability domains). A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methodology based on hierarchical clustering was developed to predict toxicological endpoints. This methodology utilizes Ward's method to divide a training set into a series of structurally similar clusters. The structural similarity is defined in terms of 2-D physicochemical descriptors (such as connectivity and E-state indices). A genetic algorithm-based technique is used to generate statistically valid QSAR models for each cluster (using the pool of descriptors described above). The toxicity for a given query compound is estimated using the weighted average of the predictions from the closest cluster from each step in the hierarchical clustering assuming that the compound is within the domain of applicability of the cluster.
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
CAS number: 131-54-4
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
please refer to the attached QMRF report
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
The substance falls within the applicability domains (structural fragment and descriptor domain) of the applied models as specified in the corresponding QMRF.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- other: QSAR
- Title:
- Prediction of density with T.E.S.T. (Toxicity Estimation Software Tool) version 4.2
- Author:
- Todd Martin, Paul Harten, Raghuraman Venkatapathy, and Douglas Young, US EPA
- Year:
- 2 012
- Bibliographic source:
- A Program to Estimate Toxicity from Molecular Structure
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ECHA Guidance R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
Toxicity Estimation Software Tool (T.E.S.T.) v4.2
- Model(s) used: Consensus method, see field 'Justification for non-standard information',
- Model description: see field 'Justification for non-standard information' and 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information' and 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- not applicable for QSAR predictions
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,2'-dihydroxy-4,4'-dimethoxybenzophenone
- EC Number:
- 205-027-3
- EC Name:
- 2,2'-dihydroxy-4,4'-dimethoxybenzophenone
- Cas Number:
- 131-54-4
- Molecular formula:
- C15H14O5
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-(2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzoyl)-5-methoxyphenol
Constituent 1
Results and discussion
Densityopen allclose all
- Key result
- Type:
- density
- Density:
- 1.38 g/cm³
- Remarks on result:
- other: Consensus method
- Type:
- density
- Density:
- 1.36 g/cm³
- Remarks on result:
- other: group contribution method
- Type:
- density
- Density:
- 1.36 g/cm³
- Remarks on result:
- other: Hierarchical clustering
- Type:
- density
- Density:
- 1.43 g/cm³
- Remarks on result:
- other: nearest neighour
Any other information on results incl. tables
The density was predicted with T.E.S.T v4.2 using a combination of different QSAR models (Consensus method).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The density was predicted to be 1.38 g/cm3.
- Executive summary:
The density was predicted with T.E.S.T v4.2 using a combination of different QSAR models (Consensus method). The density was predicted to be 1.38 g/cm3.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.