Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
21 April 2016 - 27 May 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
Version / remarks:
Updated guideline adopted July 28, 2015
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.40 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER))
Version / remarks:
30 May 2008
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: MatTek test protocol “In vitro EpiDerm(TM) Skin Corrosion Test (EPI-200-SCT)”
Version / remarks:
07 November 2014
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
dd 14 September 2015

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
rel-1-[(1R,6S)-2,2,6-trimethylcyclohexyl]hexan-3-ol
EC Number:
814-113-5
Cas Number:
253454-23-8
Molecular formula:
C15H30O
IUPAC Name:
rel-1-[(1R,6S)-2,2,6-trimethylcyclohexyl]hexan-3-ol
Test material form:
liquid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Hysandol called Timberol in the test report may be a multi of the cis and trans-isomer, while Hysandol is a mono-trans isomer. The cis isomer is expected to have the same results for this endpoint because it is stereo isomer.

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
other: epidermal keratinocytes
Cell source:
other: MatTek Corporation (Bratislava, Slovakia)
Source strain:
other: not applicable
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EpiDerm™ tissue
- Tissue batch number(s): 23338
- Delivery date: 24 May 2016
- Date of initiation of testing: 24 May 2016

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 3 minutes exposure: at room temperature, 60 minute exposure: 37 ± 1.5 °C

REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Volume and number of washing steps: 20 times using a wash bottle containing DPBS
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: no

TEST FOR DIRECT MTT REDUCTION AND COLOUR INTERFERENCE
The substance was checked for possible interference with the MTT endpoint before the start of the study. 50 μL of the test item was added to 0.3 mL of deionised water (transparent glass test-tube). The mixture was incubated in the incubator (37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 0.5 % CO2) for 60 min. At the end of the exposure time, the mixture was shaken and the presence and intensity of the staining (if any) was evaluated. The test item did not dye water when mixed with it.
To test if an item directly reduces MTT, 50 μL of the test item were added to 1 ml of a MTT/DMEM solution (1 mg/mL) and were incubated in the incubator (37 ± 1.5 °C, 5 ± 0.5 CO2) for 60 minutes. Untreated MTT/DMEM solution (1 mg/mL) medium was used as control. The test item did not prove to be a MTT reducer.

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 hours
- Microplate reader: Versamax®, Molecular Devices, SoftMax Pro Enterprise (version 4.7.1)
- Wavelength: 570 nm

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 2

NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: 2 exposure times

EVALUATION
The mean OD of the duplicate negative control tissues was calculated after blank correction. This value corresponds to 100% tissue viability in the current test. For each individual tissue treated with the test item or the positive control the individual relative tissue viability is calculated according to the following formula:
Relative viability (%)= [mean OD(test item/positive control)/mean ODnegative control] *100

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA: see Table 1

ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA:
1. The mean OD of the tissue replicates treated with the negative control should be ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8 for every exposure time
2. The mean viability of the tissue replicates treated with the positive control for 1 hour, should be <15% compared to the negative control
3. The Coefficient of Variation (CV) in the range 20 – 100% viability between tissue replicates should be ≤ 30%
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
50 μL (79.4 μL/cm^2)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
3 +/- 0.5 minutes and 60 +/- 0.5 minutes
Number of replicates:
2

Results and discussion

In vitro

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
3 minutes exposure / mean of 2 replicates
Value:
97.7
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
100
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
16.2
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
60 minutes exposure / mean of 2 replicates
Value:
105.4
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
100
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks:
10.7
Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: no
- Direct-MTT reduction: no
- Colour interference with MTT: no

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes, the mean OD of the tissue replicates treated with the negative control is ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8 for every exposure time (values between 1.627 and 1.755)
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes, the mean viability of the tissue replicates treated with the positive control for 1 hour, is <15% (10.7%) compared to the negative control
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: yes, the Coefficient of Variation (CV) in the range 20 – 100% viability between tissue replicates is ≤ 30% (values between 0.2% and 5.8%)

Any other information on results incl. tables

Mean OD570 values and viabilities for the negative control, positive control and test item are given below:

Item

Exposure Period

(minutes)

Individual OD570 of Individual tissues

Mean OD570 of duplicate tissues (tvt)

Water-Killed Tissues

True Viability
tvt-(tkt-ukt)

Relative mean viability (%)

tkt

ukt

tkt-ukt

Negative Control Item

60

1.634

0.818

 

 

 

 

100*

1.639

Positive Control Item

0.219

0.027

 

 

 

 

10.7

0.186

Test Item

3

1.587

1.611

97.7

1.635

60

1.780

1.710

105.4

1.640

*=   The mean viability of the negative control tissues is set at 100%

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: Not corrosive to the skin
Remarks:
In accordance with EU CLP (EC No. 1272/2008 and its amendments).
Conclusions:
The results of an in vitro skin corrosion test showed that the substance was not corrosive to the skin (tissue viability after 3 minutes exposure: 97.7% and tissue viability after 60 minutes exposure: 105.4%).
Executive summary:

The substance was tested in duplicate in an in vitro skin corrosion test according to OECD TG 431 test guideline and GLP principles. Tissues were exposed to the substance, a negative control (deionised water) and a positive control (8.0 N KOH) for 3 minutes and 60 minutes. The substance was tested for direct MTT reduction and colour interference and both results were negative. Acceptability criteria for the negative control, positive control and variability between measurements were met. The cell viability of the tissues exposed to the substance were 97.4% and 105.4% for 3 minutes and 60 minutes exposure, respectively. Both values did not exceed thereshold for corrosivity (50% after 3 minutes exposure and 15% after 60 minutes exposure), therefore the substance is considered not to be corrosive.