Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Water solubility

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
water solubility
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
04 Sept-06 Dec 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.6 (Water Solubility)
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 105 (Water Solubility)
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 830.7840 (Water Solubility)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
column elution method
Key result
Water solubility:
92.9 µg/L
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Temp.:
20 °C
pH:
5.4 - 6.8

Main study

During the measurements a tendency to flow rate dependent water solubility was observed. The water solubility was calculated over the 12 mL/min repeat samples and the 6 ml/min samples, i.e. after the column elution method had reached equilibrium. The maximum difference (MD) on the mean values of the samples at these flow rates was ≤ 30%. Based on this, the water solubility of the test substance is given as the mean value of these measurements. The turbidity of the eluates was < 0.2 NTU. According to this, no undissolved particles were detected in the eluates. No test substance was detected in the samples from the blank column.

Flow rate

[ml/h]

Sample

No.

Concentration analysed

pH

Individual

[µg/l]

Mean1

[µg/l]

CV

[%]

Mean2

[µg/l]

MD

[%]

24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1003

1093

122

132

124

124

131

141

143

142

 

181

178

183

190

203

197

2184

2304

2404

2974

132

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

189

6.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.3

160

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

355

5.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.8

1Mean of the concentrations obtained at one flow rate.

2Mean of the concentrations obtained at both flow rates.

3This value was not used for calculation of the mean because the system had not reached equilibrium yet.

4Obtained by extrapolation of the calibration curve. Value was not used for calculation of the mean.

5Based on this maximum deviation, the study was extended.

Flow rate

[ml/h]

Sample

No.

Concentration analysed

pH

Individual

[µg/l]

Mean1

[µg/l]

CV

[%]

Mean2

[µg/l]

MD

[%]

24

(repeat)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12 (repeat)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

32.8

67.8

40

39.3

54.2

32.2

75.3

34.5

17.4

21.5

 

 

2143

1523

123

106

122

91

99

86

131

89

 

62.1

65.3

66.2

94.0

83.7

81.3

2874

119

70.9

76.2

41.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

79.8

45

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22

n.a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

92.9

n.a

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

28

5.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.2

1Mean of the concentrations obtained at one flow rate.

2Mean of the concentrations obtained at both flow rates.

3This value was not used for calculation of the mean because the system had not reached equilibrium yet.

4Outlier according to Dixon’s Q-test.

Results of method development HPLC-MS/MS for quantification of the test substance in water:

Specificity: The chromatogram of the test substance solution showed one test substance peak. The area of this peak was used as response in the calculations.

Linearity: The calibration line was constructed using all data points. There was a linear relationship between response and test substance concentration in the range of 0.200 - 30.0 µg/L (in end solution). Since the coefficient of correlation (r) was >0.99 and the back calculated accuracies of the data points were in the range 85 -115% the calibration line was accepted.

Statistical parameters of the calibration curve:

Slope: 971

Intercept: 16.9

Weighting factor: 1/concentration2

r: 0.997

Accuracy and repeatability: The results of the accuracy samples are given below. Since the mean accuracy at each concentration level fell in the criterion 70 -110% and the coefficient of variation was </=20% the analytical method was accepted for the analysis of the test substance in water in the target concentration range of 0.01 -10 mg/L.

Accuracy samples:

Target concentration [mg/L]

Nominal concentration [mg/L]

Analysed concentration [mg/L]

Accuracy [%]

Mean accuracy [%]

Coefficient of variation [%]

0.01

0.0100

0.00971

97

99

2.1

0.0100

0.0103

102

0.0100

0.00988

99

0.0100

0.00979

98

0.0100

0.00995

99

10

9.98

9.40

94

95

1.8

9.98

9.40

94

9.98

9.27

93

9.98

9.72

97

9.98

9.36

94

Description of key information

92.9 µg/L at 20 °C, pH=5.4-6.8 based on read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Water solubility:
92.9 µg/L
at the temperature of:
20 °C

Additional information

The water solubility of the substance Decanoic acid, mixed exters with beopentyl glycol and octanic acid (CAS 70693-32-2) was determine according to EU Method A.6 (Water Solubility) using the column elution method.