Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-598-6 | CAS number: 123-07-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 28 July to 25 August 2004
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 004
- Report date:
- 2004
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 310 (Ready Biodegradability - CO2 in Sealed Vessels (Headspace Test)
- Version / remarks:
- ASTM Guideline No.: E 1720-95; ISO/DIS Guideline No.: 14593; OPPTS Guideline No.: 835.3120
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- ASTM Guideline No.: E 1720-95; ISO/DIS Guideline No.: 14593; OPPTS Guideline No.: 835.3120
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-ethylphenol
- EC Number:
- 201-958-4
- EC Name:
- 2-ethylphenol
- Cas Number:
- 90-00-6
- Molecular formula:
- C8H10O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-ethylphenol
- Reference substance name:
- 4-ethylphenol
- EC Number:
- 204-598-6
- EC Name:
- 4-ethylphenol
- Cas Number:
- 123-07-9
- Molecular formula:
- C8H10O
- IUPAC Name:
- 4-ethylphenol
- Reference substance name:
- 3-ethylphenol
- EC Number:
- 210-627-3
- EC Name:
- 3-ethylphenol
- Cas Number:
- 620-17-7
- Molecular formula:
- C8H10O
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-ethylphenol
- Test material form:
- not specified
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Ethyl phenols, Lot No.: 13 Jan 2004, purity 98.8%, received from Chemtran Services USA
Study design
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- The activated sludge was obtained from the Wareham Wastewater Treatment Plant, Wareham, Massachusetts.
- Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
Initial test substance concentration
- Initial conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Based on:
- TOC
Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- All solutions were prepared using purified reagent grade water (meeting ASTM Type II ® requirements) obtained with a Sybron/Barnstead NANOpure II system. The filter-sterilized water typically shows greater than 16.7 Mohm-cm resistivity and less than 1 mg/L total organic carbon, which is the detectable limit established by Springbom Smithers. The mineral salts medium was prepared using this purified reagent water. All chemicals were at least reagent grade and were obtained from commercial sources.
Activated sludge was collected on 28 July 2004 and transported to Springbom Smithers. Upon arrival at Springbom Smithers, the sludge was passed through a 2-mm stainless-steel metal screen and then centrifuged in four 1-L bottles for 10 minutes at 1500 rpm. The supernatant from each bottle was decanted and the sludge was kept in the bottles. Tap water was used to wash the sludge twice. The moisture content of the activated sludge was determined using an Sartorius Model MA-30 moisture balance to be 95.44%. Activated sludge (0.4386 g) was added to 2000 mL of test medium to give a solids concentration of 10 mg solids/L. The inoculum was stirred for ten minutes using a stir plate and Teflon-coated stir bar, sonicated for five minutes and filtered through glass wool prior to use.
The test design consisted of individual 20-mL clear glass crimp cap vials containing 13.5 mL of aqueous test medium. he test system was housed in the dark, in a walk-in environmental chamber set to maintain a temperature of 22 ± 2 °C. The daily temperature recorded in the environmental chamber during the study ranged from 19.6 to 21.9 °C. Test vessels were covered with aluminium foil and were mixed by swirling on days 2, 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28. To minimize bias, replicates were prepared, placed in the incubation chamber, and sampled randomly.
A 10 mg C/mL sodium benzoate stock solution was prepared by placing 1.7316 g of sodium benzoate in a 100-ml volumetric flask and bringing to volume with purified reagent water.
Eighty one (81) test vessels were established: 27 vials for the test substance, 27 vials for the reference substance (sodium benzoate) and 27 vials for the inoculum control. Test medium containing activated sludge microorganisms was added to each test vessel. Test vessels were dosed with the test substance or reference substance. Control vessels contained 13.5 mL of inoculated test medium only. Test solutions were prepared as described below:
Test solutions for ethyl phenols were prepared by adding 12.5 µL of test substance ( density = 1.02 g/mL) to 1000 mL of mineral media, resulting in a final concentration of 10 mg C/mL. An aliquot of this solution (13.5 mL) was then added to each of the 27 test vessels.
Sodium benzoate control solutions were prepared by adding 0.4 mL of the 10.0 mg C/mL stock solution to 400 mL of mineral media, resulting in a final concentration of 10 mg C/mL. An aliquot of this solution ( 13.5 mL) was added to each of the 27 test vessels.
After all of the test vessels had been filled, the vessels were scaled with butyl rubber septa and aluminum crimp caps, and wrapped in aluminium foil. The test vessels were then placed in the environmental chamber and incubated in the dark for 28 days.
Reference substance
- Reference substance:
- benzoic acid, sodium salt
Results and discussion
% Degradation
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 87
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
BOD5 / COD results
- Results with reference substance:
- Ultimate biodegradation of the reference substance, sodium bcnzoatc, initially increased and
peaked on day 10 at 94.9%, then began to decrease until test termination (85.8% on day 28) due to continued C02 evolution in the inoculum controls. Sodium benzoate, therefore can be
considered "readily biodegradable" under the OECD criterion since > 60% C02 was produced within a 10-day window after reaching 10% C02 production. In addition, the rapid and
extensive biodegradation of sodium benzoate confirmed the presence of an active and viable
microbial population and confirmed system integrity.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Cumulative CO2 (mg/L) evolved from the test vessels during the 28-day headspace biodegradation study
Carbon Dioxide Evolved: mg/L | |||||||
Test days | |||||||
Test vessel | 2 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 14 | 21 | 28 |
Inoculum control | 1.06 | 1.58 | 4.95 | 5.43 | 7.70 | 10.16 | 9.02 |
0.04 | 1.58 | 4.88 | 3.89 | 6.45 | 8.36 | - | |
-0.15 | 0.59 | 3.85 | 4.44 | 7.11 | 9.57 | 9.06 | |
Mean | 0.32 | 1.25 | 4.56 | 4.93 | 7.09 | 9.26 | 9.04 |
Std. Dev. | 0.65 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.62 | 0.92 | 0.03 |
Sodium benzoate | 28.16 | 31.65 | 35.61 | 39.49 | 40.81 | 42.54 | 39.05 |
28.90 | 32.16 | 37.73 | 40.37 | 39.90 | 40.89 | 41.58 | |
27.98 | 32.27 | 38.80 | 39.35 | 41.55 | 42.61 | 40.89 | |
Mean | 28.35 | 32.03 | 37.38 | 39.74 | 40.75 | 42.01 | 40.51 |
Std. Dev. | 0.49 | 0.33 | 1.62 | 0.56 | 0.83 | 0.97 | 1.31 |
Ethyl phenols | 10.16 | 26.62 | 30.55 | 36.49 | 38.80 | 40.59 | 39.79 |
10.85 | 26.44 | 32.97 | 37.88 | 40.12 | 40.89 | 40.34 | |
9.53 | 26.88 | 31.46 | 39.27 | 40.34 | 40.59 | 42.68 | |
Mean | 10.18 | 26.65 | 31.66 | 37.88 | 39.75 | 40.69 | 40.94 |
Std. Dev. | 0.66 | 0.22 | 1.22 | 1.39 | 0.83 | 0.17 | 1.54 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- Ethyl phenols can be classified as "readily biodegradable" under conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
This study was performed to determine the potential for biodcgradation of ethyl phenols in water by the carbon dioxide evolution method based on the ASTM E 1720-95 Sealed Vessel, the ISO/DIS-14593 Headspace, and the OPPTS 835.3120 C02 Evolution Biodegradation Test guidelines.
Test vessels were incubated aerobically in the dark for a period of 28 days.
The mean biodegradation value for ethyl phenols at test termination was 87.0% of theoretical, indicating that biodegradation occurred. Furthermore, the biodegradation value for ethyl phenols on day 7 was 73. 9%. Since the biodegradation of ethyl phenols reached > 60% within the first 7 days, ethyl phenols can be considered "readily biodegradable" according to the OECD guidelines.
In addition, the rapid and extensive biodegradation of sodium benzoate confirmed the presence of an active and viable microbial population and confirmed system integrity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.