Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2003-05-20 to 2003-06-10
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2004
Report date:
2004

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Internal lab method: SPL Standard Test Method 595.12.
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
not specified
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The study is performed according to SPL Standard Test Method. The assay determines the level of lymphocyte proliferation in lymph nodes draining the application site of the test material. Determination of lymphocyte proliferation is quantified by measuring the incorporation of radiolabelled thymidine in the dividing lymph node cells. The proliferation response of lymph node cells was expressed as the number of radioactive disintegrations per minute per lymph node (dpm/node) and as the ratio of 3HTdR incorporation into lymph node cells of test nodes relative to that recorded for the control nodes (Stimulation Index).
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
The study was conducted in a facility operating to Good Laboratory Practice within the UK national GLP monitoring programme, but the study report has not been audited by the QA unit. No formal claim of GLP compliance is made for this study.
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
9-hydroxy-3-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-methyl-4H-pyrido[1,2-a]pyrimidin-4-one
EC Number:
605-935-3
Cas Number:
181525-38-2
Molecular formula:
C11H12N2O3
IUPAC Name:
9-hydroxy-3-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-methyl-4H-pyrido[1,2-a]pyrimidin-4-one
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Specific details on test material used for the study:
No data

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: CBA/Ca
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS: no data

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS: no data

IN-LIFE DATES: no data

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethylformamide
Concentration:
2.5%, 5% and 10% w/w
No. of animals per dose:
four/dose group
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: no data
- Irritation: no data
- Lymph node proliferation response: no data
- Other: Following a preliminary sighting test, no deaths or signs of systemic toxicity were observed at a concentration of 10%.


MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: LLNA
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: Test-to-control ratio of Stimulation Index (SI) greater than 3.0 indicates a ‘positive’ result.


TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
- 50 uL of the test substance (25 uL per ear) as a solution in dimethyl formamide at concentrations of 2.5%, 5% and 10% w/w.
- A further group of four animals was treated with dimethyl formamide alone.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
see: any other information on results (here below)

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.35
Test group / Remarks:
2.5% w/w
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.79
Test group / Remarks:
5% w/w group
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.43
Test group / Remarks:
10% w/w group
Cellular proliferation data / Observations:
CELLULAR PROLIFERATION DATA
No data

DETAILS ON STIMULATION INDEX CALCULATION
see results table

Any other information on results incl. tables

Positive Control Local Lymph Node Assay in the Mouse (2003)

Start Date

Finish Date

Test Material

Concentration

Vehicle

Stimulation Indexa

Classificationb

13/03/2003

19/03/2003

α‑Hexylcinnamaldehyde, tech., 85%

5%, 10%, 25% v/v

acetone/olive oil 4:1

2.8, 2.3, 5.5

Positive

13/03/2003

19/03/2003

α‑Hexylcinnamaldehyde, tech., 85%

5%, 10%, 25% v/v

acetone/olive oil 4:1

2.0, 1.9, 6.8

Positive

10/10/2003

16/10/2003

α‑Hexylcinnamaldehyde, tech., 85%

5%, 10%, 25% v/v

acetone/olive oil 4:1

1.76, 2.78, 5.06

Positive

16/10/2003

22/10/2003

α‑Hexylcinnamaldehyde, tech., 85%

5%, 10%, 25% v/v

acetone/olive oil 4:1

1.49, 1.73, 5.26

Positive


a=        Ratio of test to control lymphocyte proliferation

b=        Stimulation index greater than 3.0 indicates a positive result

* =        Standard Test Method 595 (Pooled nodes)

·=        Standard Test Method 599 (Individual nodes)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test substance was considered to be a non-sensitiser under the conditions of the test and is therefore considered to be not classified.