Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 943-063-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Partition coefficient
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 03 October 2016 to 04 October 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 117 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), HPLC Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.8 (Partition Coefficient - HPLC Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of method:
- HPLC method
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Analytical method:
- high-performance liquid chromatography
- Key result
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- < 1
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: pH was not measured.
- Details on results:
- The three calibration series and three test item series were measured alternately. The partition coefficient Pow was determined based on a calibration curve using 6 reference substances.
The capacity factors k were calculated from the dead time and retention times of the reference substances. The log k data of the reference substances were plotted against their log Pow values. The equation of the curve fitted to the calibration points is as follows:
log k = 0.347 × log Pow - 0.621 (Rsq = 0.948)
Retention time measured for the test material (1.38 min) was lower than the first eluting standard, Acetanilide (2.97 min). This result shows that log Pow of the test material is beyond the calibrated range. The estimated log Pow is < 1.0. - Conclusions:
- Under the conditionds of the study, the estimated log Pow of the test material is < 1.0.
- Executive summary:
The partition coefficient of the test material was investigated in a GLP study in accordance with the standardised guidelines OECD 117 and EU Method A.8.
The partition coefficient of the test material was assessed using HPLC. Six chemicals for which log Pow has been reported were used to calibrate the elution time in units of log k. Reference substances were dissolved in acetonitrile. Concentration of these stock solutions was about 1 mg/mL.
Test item was dissolved in mobile phase. The concentration of the solution was about 0.5 mg/mL. The stock solution was diluted with mobile phase by 100 fold. Three series of the reference solutions were measured with two parallel injections, each. The retention times were determined. The three calibration series and three test item series were measured alternately. For the determination of t0 (t0 = retention time of the un-retarded component) thiourea solution was injected three times. The test was conducted at 25 °C.
The retention time measured for the test material (1.38 min) is lower than the first eluting standard, Acetanilide (2.97 min). This result shows that log Pow of the test material is beyond the calibrated range.
Under the conditions of the study, the estimated log Pow of the test material is < 1.0.
Reference
Table 1: Measured and calculated data of the reference substances
Chemical name |
log Pow |
Retention time (min) |
log k |
Repeatability Δ log Pow log unit |
Accuracy log unit |
log Pow |
|
OECD 117 |
Calculated |
Calculated |
|||||
Thiourea |
- |
2.10 |
for determination of dead time |
||||
2.11 |
|||||||
2.11 |
|||||||
2.10 |
|||||||
2.10 |
|||||||
2.10 |
|||||||
Mean |
2.10 |
||||||
CV % |
0.2 |
||||||
Acetanilide |
1.0 |
2.97 |
-0.385 |
0.03 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
|
2.97 |
-0.385 |
0.7 |
|||||
2.96 |
-0.390 |
0.7 |
|||||
2.97 |
-0.385 |
0.7 |
|||||
2.98 |
-0.380 |
0.7 |
|||||
2.96 |
-0.390 |
0.7 |
|||||
Mean |
2.97 |
-0.386 |
0.7 |
||||
CV % |
0.3 |
- |
- |
||||
Benzonitrile |
1.6 |
4.22 |
0.003 |
0.01 |
0.2 |
1.8 |
|
4.22 |
0.003 |
1.8 |
|||||
4.23 |
0.005 |
1.8 |
|||||
4.21 |
0.001 |
1.8 |
|||||
4.22 |
0.003 |
1.8 |
|||||
4.22 |
0.003 |
1.8 |
|||||
Mean |
4.22 |
0.003 |
1.8 |
||||
CV % |
0.1 |
- |
- |
||||
Methyl benzoate |
2.1 |
5.25 |
0.175 |
0.00 |
0.2 |
2.3 |
|
5.24 |
0.174 |
2.3 |
|||||
5.25 |
0.175 |
2.3 |
|||||
5.24 |
0.174 |
2.3 |
|||||
5.25 |
0.175 |
2.3 |
|||||
5.25 |
0.175 |
2.3 |
|||||
Mean |
5.25 |
0.174 |
2.3 |
||||
CV % |
0.1 |
- |
- |
||||
Ethyl benzoate |
2.6 |
6.85 |
0.353 |
0.01 |
0.2 |
2.8 |
|
6.85 |
0.353 |
2.8 |
|||||
6.84 |
0.353 |
2.8 |
|||||
6.86 |
0.354 |
2.8 |
|||||
6.85 |
0.353 |
2.8 |
|||||
6.85 |
0.353 |
2.8 |
|||||
Mean |
6.85 |
0.353 |
2.8 |
||||
CV % |
0.1 |
- |
- |
||||
Benzophenone |
3.2 |
7.88 |
0.439 |
0.00 |
0.1 |
3.1 |
|
7.88 |
0.439 |
3.1 |
|||||
7.87 |
0.438 |
3.1 |
|||||
7.87 |
0.438 |
3.1 |
|||||
7.88 |
0.439 |
3.1 |
|||||
7.88 |
0.439 |
3.1 |
|||||
Mean |
7.88 |
0.439 |
3.1 |
||||
CV % |
0.1 |
- |
- |
||||
Naphthalene |
3.6 |
10.12 |
0.581 |
0.00 |
0.1 |
3.5 |
|
10.11 |
0.581 |
3.5 |
|||||
10.11 |
0.581 |
3.5 |
|||||
10.11 |
0.581 |
3.5 |
|||||
10.11 |
0.581 |
3.5 |
|||||
10.11 |
0.581 |
3.5 |
|||||
Mean |
10.11 |
0.581 |
3.5 |
||||
CV % |
0.0 |
- |
- |
Description of key information
Under the conditions of the study, the estimated log Pow of the test material is < 1.0.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- at the temperature of:
- 25 °C
Additional information
The partition coefficient of the test material was investigated in a GLP study in accordance with the standardised guidelines OECD 117 and EU Method A.8. The study was assigned a reliability score of 1 in accordance with the criteria for assessing data quality set forth by Klimisch et al. (1997).
The partition coefficient of the test material was assessed using HPLC. Six chemicals for which log Pow has been reported were used to calibrate the elution time in units of log k. Reference substances were dissolved in acetonitrile. Concentration of these stock solutions was about 1 mg/mL.
Test item was dissolved in mobile phase. The concentration of the solution was about 0.5 mg/mL. The stock solution was diluted with mobile phase by 100 fold. Three series of the reference solutions were measured with two parallel injections, each. The retention times were determined. The three calibration series and three test item series were measured alternately. For the determination of t0 (t0 = retention time of the un-retarded component) thiourea solution was injected three times. The test was conducted at 25 °C.
The retention time measured for the test material (1.38 min) is lower than the first eluting standard, Acetanilide (2.97 min). This result shows that log Pow of the test material is beyond the calibrated range.
Under the conditions of the study, the estimated log Pow of the test material is < 1.0.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
