Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Remarks:
Test substance represents a main component (stereoisomer) of the registered substance
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: non GLP, short study report with inconsistencies

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
Guinea Pig Maximisation Test
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Study was performed before LLNA was formally validated and available as OECD guideline in 2002.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Isopulegol
EC Number:
201-940-6
EC Name:
Isopulegol
Cas Number:
89-79-2
Molecular formula:
C10H18O
IUPAC Name:
(1R,2S,5R)-2-Isopropenyl-5-methylcylohexanol
Details on test material:
Test Item: Isopulegol
no further data

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 309-416 g
- Age at study initiation: 6 months

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
other: propyleneglycol plus acetone (1:1)
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal induction: 10%
Epicutaneous induction: 10%
Challenge
Route:
other: epicutaneous (unspecified)
Vehicle:
other: propyleneglycol plus acetone (1:1)
Concentration / amount:
Epicutaneous challenge: 40, 20, 10, 5%
No. of animals per dose:
5
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: sighting tests were performed for test substance concentration selection. No further data


MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2
- Exposure period: no data
- Test groups: intradermal (10% in Complete Adjuvant + 10% in a mixture of Freund´s Complete Adjuvant and phys. saline (1:1)) topical (10% in Complete Adjuvant)
- Control group: yes, no further data on treatment
- Site: back


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: no data
- Exposure period: 24h
- Test groups: 40, 20, 10, 5% in propyleneglycol/acetone
- Control group: yes, no further data on treatment
- Site: back
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24h

OTHER:
Hair was cut with an electric hair clipper and electric shaver
Scoring of dermal reactions acc. to Draize
Challenge controls:
yes
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
40%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 40%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
40%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 40%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

The test item produced a sensitisation index of 0 (0/5) in all concentrations tested up to 40% and was classified as a non-sensitiser to guinea pig skin at a maximum concentration of 40%. Accordingly , no reactions were noted at the challenge site of control group animals.

In the test report, the sensitization rate has been described as 0% (0/10), however only 5 animals have been tested per dose group.

Applicant's summary and conclusion