Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
1974
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study was conducted using a method similar to OECD Testing Guideline 475 and meets acceptable scientific standards.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1974
Report date:
1974

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 475 (Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
higher dose limit, 500 cells evaluated per animal instead of 1000
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
chromosome aberration assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Silicic acid, aluminum sodium salt
EC Number:
215-684-8
EC Name:
Silicic acid, aluminum sodium salt
Cas Number:
1344-00-9
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): FDA 71-45 (Sodium silicoaluminate)
- Physical state: Fine white powdered material
- Lot/batch No.: SR-1621

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Not provided
- Age at study initiation: 10 to 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 280 to 350 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: Yes
- Fasting period before study: Not provided
- Housing: Five per cage
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Quarantine for 4 - 11 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Not provided
- Humidity (%): Not provided
- Air changes (per hr): Not provided
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Not provided

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
- Vehicle: 0.85 saline
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:

DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): Not provided
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): Not provided
- Storage temperature of food: Not provided
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Acute toxicity: single administration
Subacute toxicity: five days (five administrations)
Frequency of treatment:
Acute toxicity: one exposure at three time points (6 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours)
Subacute toxicity: one exposure per concentration per day
Post exposure period:
Termination after administration
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
subacute: 4.25, 42.5, 425 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc.
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
acute: 5000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Acute toxicity: five per dose per time points (45) + negative control three per time points (9) + positive control five only for the last time point (5)
Subacute toxicity: five per dose (15) + negative control
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
other: positive control: TEM 0.3 mg/kg
Positive control(s):
triethylenemelamine (TEM)
- Route of administration: oral gavage
- Doses / concentrations: 0.3 mg/kg bw

Examinations

Tissues and cell types examined:
Bone marrow diploid cells
Fifty metaphase spreads scored per animal.
Mitotic indices obtained by counting at least 500 cells
Details of tissue and slide preparation:
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
- Slides dried at room temperature. Duplicate slides prepared. Slides stained using a 5% Giemsa solution (Giemsa buffer pH 7.2) for 20 minutes, rinsed in acetone, 1:1 acetone:xylene, and placed in fresh xylene for 30 minutes.

METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
- Chromosomes of each cell counted and only diploid cells analyzed.

OTHER:
- Intraperitoneal administration of 4 mg/kg of colcemid two hours prior to killing.
Evaluation criteria:
Chromatid gaps and breaks, polyploidy, chromosome gaps and breaks, reunions, pulverization, cells with greater than ten aberrations, and any other chromosomal aberrations.

Results and discussion

Test results
Sex:
male
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
not examined
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
The test item was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
Executive summary:

The in vivo cytogenicity of the read-across substance sodium silicoaluminate branded as FDA 71-45 was determined according to a method similar to the OECD Guideline for Testing of chemicals 475. Chromosome aberrations were evaluated in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Two methods of dosing were used. In the acute method, one dose of 5000 mg/kg bw was administrated. In the subacute, doses of 4.25, 42.5, and 425 mg/kg were administrated daily for five days.

Each animal was intraperitoneally administrated 4 mg/kg of colcemid two hours prior to killing in order to stop the mitosis. Bone marrow slides were prepared and stained with 5% Giemsa solution in order to score pulverization, achromatid gaps and breaks, chromosome gaps and breaks, cells with greater than ten aberrations, reunions, polyploidy, and any other chromosomal aberrations in diploid cells.

No significant numbers of aberration were observed for each tested concentration.

The test item was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the test.