Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
March 1980
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: the study was performed before GLP- and OECD-testing guidelines were available and in force; therefore the study was considered to have Klimisch 2, however it provides enough information to assess the acute toxicity to rats after oral application
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1980
Report date:
1980

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4,6-dione
EC Number:
217-992-8
EC Name:
2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4,6-dione
Cas Number:
2033-24-1
Molecular formula:
C6H8O4
IUPAC Name:
2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxane-4,6-dione
Test material form:
solid: crystalline
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): P5096
- Physical state: crystalline powder
- Analytical purity: 97.6%
- Purity test date: 28-Nov-1979
- Lot/batch No.: no data
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Morton Commercial Rabbits, Parsonage Farm, Stansted, Essex, UK
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 2.0 - 3.5 kg
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Food (Rabbit Pellets C, Spillers Agriculture Ltd., Old Change House, Canon Street, London)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Mains water was provided and dipensed from glass water bottles
- Acclimation period: 7 days
- Housing: caged individually in grid floor cages

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): not controlled except that a lower limit of 14°C was automatically imposed
- Humidity (%): not controlled
- Air changes (per hr): fan controlled air circulation
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): natural lighting supplemented with fluorescent lighting during working hours (06.00 - 20.00)

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
abraded
Vehicle:
water
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
The test article was moistened with water and applied as a paste. Portions of the test article (0.5 g) were applied.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
4, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment
Number of animals:
6 animals
Details on study design:
APPLICATION TEST ARTICLE:
Twenty-four hours prior to treatment, the back of each animal was clipped free of hair using veterinary clippers (Model A2, aster, Milwaukee, Wisconsin). One side of the clipped area on each animal was left intact. The other side was abraded using a clipper head to penetrate the horny layer of the epidermis, but without causing bleeding or damage to the underlying dermis.
Portions of the test article (0.5 g) were applied to 1 intact and 1 abraded site on each animal and covered with patches of gauze (25 mm x 25 mm). A small plug of cotton wool weighing approximately 1 g was placed over the top of the pads to achieve uniform pressure over the whole treatai surface. The pads were held in place by a strip of adhesive impermeable plaster, (Sleek, Smith and Nephew Ltd., Welwyn Garden City, Herts). An Elizabethan collar was placed around the neck of each animal to prevent removal of the wrapping. Four hours after treatment the wrappings and collars were removed.

SCORING SYSTEM:
According to Food and Drug Administration "Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Focxls, Drugs and Cosmetics", 1959.) The scores for
erythema and oedema were used to calculate the primary irritation index of the test article

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24-72h
Score:
0.2
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 72h
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24-72h
Score:
0.1
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 72h
Irritant / corrosive response data:
ERYTHEMA:
5/6 animals showed a score of 0 over the observation period of 24-72h.
1/6 animal showed a score of 1 over the observation period of 24-72h. Not fully reversible within: 72h

OEDEMA:
5/6 animals showed a score of 0 over the observation period of 24-72h.
1/6 animal showed a score of 0.7 over the observation period of 24-72h. Not fully reversible within: 72h

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
slightly irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The substance was classified as non-irritant to skin
Executive summary:

A study was carried out equivalent or similar to OECD Guideline 404 (skin irritation) on six NZW rabbits. The test was performed in 1980 as GLP-study according to OECD 404. Six albino rabbits were treated semi-occlusive with 0.5 g test item applied on a 25 x 25 mm gauze covered with patches. Observation times were 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the patch. Slight erythema and oedema were observed in one out of six animals, resulting in a primary irritation index of 0.4. The substance was classified as non-irritant to skin.