Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 215-138-9 | CAS number: 1305-78-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Under physiological conditions, calcium oxide ultimately dissociates
into Ca2+ and OH-.
Calcium, as an essential and abundantly available mineral nutrient, is
not toxic to reproduction/fertility.
OH- is neutralised in body fluids, hence not relevant in terms of
toxicity to reproduction/fertility.
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Species:
- other: human
- Quality of whole database:
- No study is available for calcium oxide. The NOAEL is based on the upper intake level for calcium of 36 mg/kg bw/day for humans established by the Scientific Committee on Food (2006) and converted to the calcium oxide equivalent.
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
In a calcium carbonate feeding study in mice [Richards and Greig, 1952] performed using a method similar to a one-generation reproductive toxicity study, the highest dose of 2% calcium carbonate (corresponding to 1.1% Ca) resulted in reduced number and total weight of litters and an increase in the number and proportion of litter deaths. This dose was considered as the LOAEL for reproductive performance. The dose level of 0.73 % Ca was established as the NOAEL, although there were some sporadic effects without statistical significance. However, the daily dose level in mg/kg bw could not be calculated as there were no data on daily food intake.
Data are available from an OECD TG 422 study in rats performed using calcium carbonate [Dunster, 2010]. There were no treatment related effects observed on mating, fertility or gestation length at any dose level. The offspring litter size, viability, growth and development were all comparable to controls and no adverse effects were noted. Since no treatment-related effects were observed for reproduction, a NOEL for reproductive toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day, equivalent to 400 mg Ca/kg bw/day.
However, with respect to potential hazards of calcium for reproduction the following aspects must be considered:
i) The primary effect of calcium oxide is characterised by primary local irritating effects at the site of first contact, and
ii) Calcium cations and hydroxyl anions which are formed in aqueous media from calcium oxide are physiologically essential elements and nutrients for all mammals including humans. Comprehensive evaluations of possible adverse health effects of individual nutrients at intakes in excess of dietary requirements have been presented in the scientific opinions of the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF, 2006). Where possible, tolerable upper intake levels (UL) for different human populations have been established. The UL is an estimate of the highest level of intake entailing no appreciable risk of adverse health effects. The sources, properties and effects of calcium on animals as well as on different subgroups of the human population have been re-evaluated and a tolerable upper intake level for calcium has been defined. The SCF decided to base the derivation of an UL for calcium on the evidence of different interventional studies of long duration in adults, some of which were placebo-controlled and in which total daily calcium intakes of 2500 mg from both the diet and supplements were tolerated without any adverse effects. Based on the findings, a tolerable upper intake level of 2500 mg of calcium per day for calcium intake from all sources is proposed for adults, corresponding to a dose of about 36 mg calcium/kg bw/day taking into account an average body weight of 70 kg/person. The UL is considered to also cover any potential reproductive effects. Therefore, the tolerable upper intake level of 36 mg Ca/kg bw/day (equivalent to 50 mg/kg bw/day for calcium oxide) is recommended as a starting point for hazard assessment regarding reproductive toxicity and derivation of a corresponding DNEL.
iii) Supportive information is available in section 7.12 (s_Mortimer_1988) showing that calcium is essential for the function of human spermatozoa (acrosome reaction), i.e. calcium has a beneficial effect on reproductive performance.
iv) Supportive information is available in section 7.12 (s_Han_2000) showing that calcium has a protective effect against lead accumulation in dams and their offspring, i.e. acts beneficially.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Calcium is not teratogenic. For calcium oxide the NOAEL for developmental effects and for maternal toxicity was established at 440 mg/kg bw/d (key study on CaO).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Well-documented study. The study allows the derivation of a NOAEL value for effects of Ca on developmental toxicity in rats and mice.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Housing: Mice were housed in groups in disposable plastic cages.
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum; tap water
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 23 - 27
- Humidity (%): 64 - 78
No further details are given. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- no detailed data given
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no detailed data given
- Details on mating procedure:
- The female mice were mated with young adult males.
- Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: One male was not permitted to impregnate more than one female per group.
- Length of cohabitation: no data
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
No further details are given. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Beginning on Day 6 and continuing through Day 15 of gestation, the females were dosed with the indicated dosages.
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- until Day 17 of pregnancy
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- mated: 25 to 26 mice
prgnant: 17 to 21 mice - Control animals:
- yes
- yes, sham-exposed
- Details on study design:
- no data available
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
- Cage side observations checked in table were included.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: All animals were observed daily for appearance and behavior.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Average body weight was determined on days 0, 6, 11, 15 and 17
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
- Time schedule: All animals were observed daily with particular attention to food consumption and weight.
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day # 17
- Organs examined: The urogential tract of each dam was examined in detail for anatomical normality. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: No data
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes
- Skeletal examinations: Yes
- Head examinations: Yes - Statistics:
- no data given
- Indices:
- no data given
- Historical control data:
- no data given
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
The administration of up to 440 mg/kg bw/d of CaO to pregnant mice for 10 consecutive days had no clearly discernible effect on maternal survival. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 440 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
The administration of up to 440 mg/kg bw/d of CaO to pregnant mice for 10 consecutive days had no clearly discernible effect on foetal survival. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 440 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The administration of up to 440 mg/kg (body weight) of the test material to pregnant mice for 10 consecutively days had no clearly discernible effect on nidation or on maternal or fetal survival. The number of abnormalities seen in either soft or skeletal tissues of the test groups did not differ from the number occuring sponaneously in the sham-treated controls.
Reference
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 440 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- mouse
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Three pre-natal developmental toxicity studies are available.
The design of these studies was comparable to OECD TG 414. In a study in which rats were dosed with calcium carbonate via feed [Shackelford et al., 1993] no adverse developmental, foetotoxic or teratogenic effects were noted at doses up to 1.25% Ca (equivalent to 938 mg Ca/kg bw/day) which was the highest dose tested. In a study in which rats were dosed with calcium oxide by gavage, the NOAEL for developmental effects and maternal toxicity was the high dose of 680 mg/kg bw/day (equivalent to 486 mg Ca/kg bw/day [Bailey and Morgareidge, 1974]. In a second study by the same authors, the highest calcium oxide dose of 440 mg/kg bw/day (equivalent to 315 mg Ca/kg bw/day) was established as the NOAEL for developmental effects and for maternal toxicity in mice.
In addition to these studies, an OECD TG 422 study in rats is available for calcium carbonate [Dunster, 2010]. No treatment-related effects were observed for reproduction/ developmental toxicity at the highest dose tested, therefore the NOEL for reproductive/ developmental toxicity was 1000 mg/kg bw/day from this study.
Lack of developmental/teratogenic effects or even beneficial effects of calcium supplementation on foetal development is further supported by human data (s_Villar_1990_calcium carbonate, s_Levine_1997_calcium carbonate, s_Koo_1999).
The lowest NOAEL for developmental toxicity of 315 mg Ca/kg bw/d is derived from the study on mice and is established as an NOAEL for risk assessment purposes.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Calcium is an ssential minaral nutrient for mammals including humans. Based on evaluation of a wealth of human medical and nutritional data (Anonymous, 2001 [FAO/WHO report]; Anonymous, 2006 [SCF opinion]), it is concluded that calcium, therefore also calcium oxide, does not pose any hazard for reproduction and/or developmental toxicity. Classification for toxicity to reproduction is not warranted.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
