Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

In a skin irritation/corrosion study with bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]polysulfides (CAS No. 211519-85-6, EC No. 915-673-4) conducted according to a standard guideline similar to OECD Test Guideline 404 with acceptable restrictions but which pre-dated GLP, the test material was concluded to be not irritating to rabbit skin (Laboratorium fűr Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, 1976a).

 

In an eye irritation/corrosion study with bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]polysulfides conducted according to a standard guideline similar to OECD Test Guideline 405 but which pre-dated GLP, the test material was concluded to be not irritating to the eyes of rabbits (Laboratorium fűr Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, 1977c).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: FDA (1965). Part 191, Section 11.
Deviations:
not applicable
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: No information available
- Age at study initiation: No information available
- Weight at study initiation: 2.3 - 2.8 kg
- Housing: Animals were individually housed in V2A steel cages with a ground area of 0.4 m2
- Diet: ALTROMIN 2023 ad libitum except during treatment
- Water: Tap water ad libitum except during treatment
- Acclimation period: No information available


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 ± 2°
- Humidity (%): 60 ± 3%
- Air changes (per hr): No information available
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12


IN-LIFE DATES: No information available
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
other: Shaved, intact (3 animals) or abraded (3 animals)s
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.5 ml
- Concentration (if solution): Neat

Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h exposure
Observation period:
Observed at 48, 72, 96 and 120 h following application.
Number of animals:
6 (3 male, 3 female), with 3 intact and 3 abraded
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
- % coverage: No information available
- Type of wrap: Plastic foil fastened with a gum patch.


REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: No information available


SCORING SYSTEM: Draize
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Remarks:
intact skin
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Remarks:
intact skin
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Remarks:
intact skin
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Remarks:
abraded skin
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Remarks:
abraded skin
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Remarks:
abraded skin
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Remarks:
intact skin
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Remarks:
intact skin
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Remarks:
intact skin
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Remarks:
abraded skin
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Remarks:
abraded skin
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Remarks:
abraded skin
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects:
No skin reactions or clinical signs were observed in any animal. Re-growth of hair was unaffected by treatment. See Table 1 below.

Table 1: Irritant/corrosive response data for each animal at each observation time point up to removal of each animal from the test

Score at time point*/ Reversibility

Erythema

Oedema

Max. score: 4

Max. score: 4

24 h (removal of patch)

0/0/0/0/0/0

0/0/0/0/0/0

48 h (24h following removal)

0/0/0/0/0/0

0/0/0/0/0/0

72 h (48h following removal)

0/0/0/0/0/0

0/0/0/0/0/0s

96 h (72h following removal)

0/0/0/0/0/0

0/0/0/0/0/0

120 h (96h following removal)

0/0/0/0/0/0

0/0/0/0/0/0

Average 24h, 48h, 72h (following removal)

0

0

Reversibility**

n/a

n/a

Average time (unit) for reversion

n/a

n/a

* Results for 6 animals shown: 3 abraded, 3 non-abraded, all individual scores also equal to 0.

** Reversibility: c. = completely reversible; n.c. = not completely reversible; n = not reversible

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In a reliable skin irritation study conducted in accordance to an appropriate national test guideline similar to OECD Test Guideline 404, the substance was found to be non-irritant to rabbit skin. The test pre-dated GLP.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
December 1976 - no further details
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: FDA (1965). Part 191, Section 11.
Deviations:
not applicable
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 2.3-2.8 kg
- Housing: 1/cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): standard diet ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): drinking water ad libitum

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 +/-2
- Humidity (%): 60 +/- 3
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h/12 h


IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: not stated in report
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: Control is the other eye, treated with physiological saline
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 ml
- Concentration (if solution): neat
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Single application. Exposure until end of study - apparently 72 h.
Observation period (in vivo):
24, 48 and 72 h after application.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3M, 3F
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Apparently no washing.

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp and fluorescein
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
There was no indication of irritation in any of the 6 animals at 24, 48 or 72 h following treatment. Examinations at each time point were made using a hand slit lamp and fluorescein. See Table 1 below.

Table 1: Irritant/corrosive response data at each observation time up to removal of each animal from the test

Score at time point / Reversibility*

Cornea

Iris

Conjunctivae

Chemosis

Max. score: 4

Max. score: 2

Max. score: 3

Max. score: 4

24 h

0

0

0

0

48 h

0

0

0

0

72 h

0

0

0

0

Average 24h, 48h, 72h

0

0

0

0

Area effected

0

0

0

0

Maximum average score (including area affected, max 110)

0

0

0

0

Reversibility

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

Average time (unit) for reversion

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

* Scores are average of 6 rabbits, all individusl scores were also equal to 0

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
In a reliable study predating GLP conducted according to a standard guideline very similar to OECD Test Guideline 405 with acceptable restrictions, the test material was concluded to be not irritating to the eyes of rabbits.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

The key skin irritation/corrosion study with bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]polysulfides (Laboratorium fűr Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, 1976a) was selected from two studies considered reliable with restrictions. The second study followed an identical test procedure but contained 1% of an additive. Both studies showed no irritant effects. For two additional studies, the documentation insufficient for an assessment of reliability, but the results as reported did not disagree with the key study finding.

 

The key study for skin irritation with bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]polysulfides was conducted according to a standard guideline similar to OECD Test Guideline 404 with acceptable restrictions, but pre-dated GLP (Laboratorium fűr Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, 1976a). In this study, the test material was concluded to be non-irritating to rabbit skin. No skin reactions or clinical signs were observed in any animal at any time point.

 

A supporting skin irritation study with bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]polysulfides was conducted according to a standard guideline similar to OECD Test Guideline 404 with acceptable restrictions, but pre-dated GLP (Laboratorium fűr Pharmakologie und Toxikologie 1976b). The test material was not irritating to rabbit skin.

 

Two additional skin irritation studies with bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]polysulfides were available (no test guideline identified for one, a standard guideline similar to OECD Test Guideline 404 for the second, both pre-dated GLP; Laboratorium fűr Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, 1977a and b). While the results as reported did not disagree with the key study finding, no definitive conclusion about irritation potential could be drawn due to the documentation being insufficient.

 

The key study for eye irritation with bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]polysulfides was conducted according to a standard guideline similar to OECD Test Guideline 405 with acceptable restrictions but pre-dated GLP (Laboratorium fűr Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, 1977c). In this study, the test material was concluded to be non-irritating to rabbit eyes. No eye reactions or clinical signs were observed in any animal at any time point.

 

The supporting eye irritation study followed an identical test procedure but contained 1.5% of an additive. In this supporting study that pre-dated GLP, the test material also was concluded to be not irritating to the eyes of rabbits (Laboratorium fűr Pharmakologie und Toxikologie 1977d).

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data, bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)polysulfides does not require classification for skin or eye irritation according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.