Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
basic toxicokinetics in vitro / ex vivo
Remarks:
Bioaccessibility - transformation/dissolution in artificial physiological media
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012-09-20 to 2013-02-11
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study
Objective of study:
bioaccessibility (or bioavailability)
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 29 (23-Jul-2001): Guidance document on transformation/dissolution of metals and metal compounds in aqueous media
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Bioaccessibility testing: loading of 100 mg/L; five artificial physiological media agitated at 100 rpm, at 37 °C ± 2 °C; sampling after 2h and 24h; determination of Cr, Co and Al concentrations after filtration by ICP-OES and ICP-MS.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
An internationally agreed guideline does not exist for this test (e.g. OECD). However, similar tests have been conducted with several metal compounds, including steels, in previous risk assessments (completed under Regulation (EEC) No 793/93) and in recent preparation for REACH regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
The test was performed on the basis of the guidance for OECD-Series on testing and assessment Number 29 and according to the bioaccessibility test protocol provided by the study monitor.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
signed, 2011-02-07
Species:
other: in vitro (simulated human body fluids)
Details on exposure:
Test principle in brief:
- five different artificial physiological media,
- single loading of test substance of 100 mg/L,
- samples taken after 2 and 24 hours agitation (100 rpm) at 37 ± 2 °C,
- two method blanks per artificial media were tested; measurement (by ICP-OES and ICP-MS) of dissolved chromium, aluminium and cobalt concentrations after filtration (0.2 µm, Supor membrane)
- the study was performed in duplicates

The aim of this test was to assess the dissolution of IPC-2013-011 (Cobalt chromite blue green spinel) in five artificial physiological media: Artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF, pH = 4.5), Artificial sweat solution (ASW, pH = 6.5), Gamble´s solution (GMB, pH = 7.4), Artificial gastric fluid (GST, pH = 1.5), Phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.4). The test media were selected to simulate relevant human-chemical interactions (as far as practical), i.e. a substance entering the human body by ingestion into the gastrointestinal tract and by inhalation.
Duration and frequency of treatment / exposure:
Samples were taken after 2 h and 24h.
Dose / conc.:
100 other: mg of the test item /L artificial media
Details on study design:
Reagents
The water (resistivity >18 MΩ·cm.) used for this test was purified with a Pure Lab Ultra water purification system from ELGA LabWater, Celle, Germany.
- Nitric acid - “Supra” quality (ROTIPURAN® supplied by Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany).
- Hydrochloric acid – “instra-analyzed plus” quality (J.T. Baker, Griesheim, Germany).

Metal analysis
- Standards: single and multielement standards: Merck XXI (lot no. HC075495); Merck VIII (lot no. HC137073); Merck Certipur Cobalt ICP standard 1000 mg/L (lot no. HC242065); Merck Certipur Chromium ICP standard 1000 mg/L (lot. no. HC114885), Merck Certipur Aluminium ICP standard 1000 mg/L (lot no. HC125228, Darmstadt, Germany).
- Certified reference materials: TMDA-70 (lot no. 0310, Environment Canada) and a multielement standard: Merck VIII (lot no. HC137073)

Instrumental and analytical set-up for the ICP-OES instrument:
Thermo IRIS Intrepid II from Thermo Electron Corporation, Germany
Nebulizer: Concentric glass nebulizer, from Thermo
Spray chamber: Glass cyclonic spray chamber, from Thermo
Nebulizer gas flow: 0.68 L/min
Make-up gas flow: 0.5 L/min
RF power: 1150 W
Wavelengths: Co: 228.616 nm, 230.786 nm and 231.160 nm; Cr: 205.552 nm, 267.716 nm and 284.325 nm
Calibration: blank, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 µg/L.
Correlation coefficients (r): at least 0.9999
Two measurement series were performed for the determination of cobalt and chromium concentrations in the samples, mass balance samples and filter samples.
The applied LOD/LOQ calculations are:
LOD: 3 * method standard deviation from calibration line;
LOQ: 10 * method standard deviation from calibration line.

Instrumental and analytical set-up for the ICP-MS instrument:
Agilent 7700 ICP-MS, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany
Nebulizer: Concentric glass nebulizer, from GlassExpansion
Spray chamber: Scott Type spray chamber, from Agilent
Carrier gas flow: 0.91 L/min
Dilution/Make-up gas flow: 0.13 L/min
RF power: 1500 W
Isotopes: 52Cr, 53Cr, 54Cr, 59Co, 27Al, 103Rh (internal standard)
Calibrations: blank, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 25.0, 50.0, 75.0, 100, 250 and 500 µg/L
Correlation factors (r): at least 0.9989

In sum, five series of measurements were performed for the determination of total dissolved cobalt, chromium and aluminium concentrations in samples including the test vessels as well as blanks to determine background levels of elements and fortified samples. The LOD and LOQ for cobalt, chromium and aluminium were calculated using the internal instrument algorithm. This calculation is according to DIN 32645. For this the standard deviation of calibration blanks is multiplied by 3 and divided by the slope of the calibration line.
Details on dosing and sampling:
Loading:
The nominal loading in this test was 100 mg/L. However, due to weighing uncertainties the actual loadings range from 100.362 mg/L to 101.934 mg/L in the test vessels.
Type:
other: Bioaccessibility
Results:
Higest dissolution at a loading of 0.1g/L after 24h in ALF: Co: 9.89 ± 0.16 µg/L, Al: 23.5 ± 0.81 µg/L; after 2h in ALF: Cr: 1.11 ± 0.10 µg/L; after 24h in GST: Co: 8.88 ± 0.41 µg/L, Cr: 0.89 ± 0.03 µg/L, Al: 17.5 ± 1.01 µg/L

Method validation summary (ICP-OES)

validation parameter

results

Comment

Selectivity

similar data with two different Co and Cr wavelengths for ICP-OES method

no interferences observed

Linearity

applied calibration functions were linear

correlation coefficient at least 0.9999

Limit of detection

Co: 0.71 -2.58 µg/L
Cr: 1.11 – 3.59 µg/L

Limit of quantification

Co: 2.35 – 8.60 µg/L
Cr: 8.73 – 12.0 µg/L

Accuracy

mean recovery for CRM TMDA-70:
Co: 99.6 ± 2.8 % (n = 9)
Cr: 101 ± 2.2 % (n = 9)

high concentration range (285 µg Co/L; 389 µg Cr/L )

Trueness

mean recovery for recalibration standard Merck VIII:
Co: 101 ± 1.6 % (n = 5)
Cr: 103 ± 1.7 % (n = 5)

low concentration range (10 µg/L)

Trueness

mean recovery for recalibration standard Merck VIII:
Co: 95.5 ± 1.5 % (n = 5)
Cr: 96.6 ± 1.8 % (n = 5)

mid low concentration range (25 µg/L)

Trueness

mean recovery for recalibration standard Merck VIII:
Co: 101 ± 1.2 % (n = 4)
Cr: 100 ± 1.2 % (n = 4)

high concentration range (100 µg/L)

Trueness

mean recovery for recalibration standard Merck VIII:
Co: 100 ± 0.5 % (n = 4)
Cr: 100 ± 0.4 % (n = 4)

high concentration range (250 µg/L)

Reproducibility

mean recovery for CRM TMDA-70:
Co: 99.6 ± 2.8 % (n = 9)
Cr: 101 ± 2.2 % (n = 9)

high concentration range (285 µg Co/L; 389 µg Cr/L )

Method validation summary (ICP-MS)

validation parameter

results

Comment

Selectivity

Cr: similar on different isotopes and the respective gas modes (NoGas, Helium, HiHelium)

Co: similar in Helium and HiHelium mode

Al: similar in Helium and HiHelium mode

appropriate Isotope and gas mode were selected for interference free measurements

Linearity

applied calibration functions were linear

correlation coefficients 0.9989

Limit of detection

Cr: 0.001 – 0.06 µg/L

Co: 0.0004 – 0.45 µg/L

Al: 0.31 – 3.46 µg/L

Limit of quantification

Cr: 0.003 – 0.08 µg/L

Co: 0.001 – 1.38 µg/L

Al: 0.92 – 10.4 µg/L

Method blanks

see table below: `Concentration of Cr, Co and Al method blanks in artificial media (ICP-MS measurement series)´

Elevated concentrations of Cr , Co and Al in method blanks origin from the applied chemicals for preparation of different media

Accuracy

mean recovery for CRM TMDA-70:
Cr: 103 ± 6.1 % (n = 20)
Co: 105 ± 6.4 % (n = 20)

Al: 102 ± 14 % (n = 20)

higher concentration range (389 µg Cr/L; 285 µg Co/L, 415 µg Al/L)

Trueness

mean recovery for recalibration standard Merck VIII:
Cr: 99.5 ± 6.9 % (n = 20)
Co: 98.9 ± 6.2 % (n = 20)

Al: 100 ± 14 % (n = 20)

low concentration range (10 µg/L)

Trueness

mean recovery for recalibration standard Merck VIII:
Cr: 101 ± 9.4 % (n = 20)

Co: 100 ± 4.5 % (n = 20)

Al: 101 ± 10 % (n = 20)

mid concentration range (100 µg/L)

Trueness

Fortification of samples:

Cr: 89.0– 108 %

Ni: 91.2 – 107 %

Al: 88.0– 104 %

Reproducibility

mean recovery for CRM TMDA-70:
Cr: 103 ± 6.1 % (n = 20)
Co: 105 ± 6.4 % (n = 20)

Al: 102 ± 14 % (n = 20)

higher concentration range (389 µg Cr/L; 285 µg Co/L, 415 µg Al/L)

Reproducibility

mean recovery for recalibration standard Merck VIII:
Cr: 99.5 ± 6.9 % (n = 20)
Co: 98.9 ± 6.2 % (n = 20)

Al: 100 ± 14 % (n = 20)

low concentration range (10 µg/L)

Reproducibility

mean recovery for recalibration standard Merck VIII:
Cr: 101 ± 9.4 % (n = 20)
Co: 100 ± 4.5 % (n = 20)

Al: 101 ± 10 % (n = 20)

mid concentration range (100 µg/L)

Concentration of Cr, Co and Al method blanks in artificial media (ICP-MS measurement series)

Artificial media

Element

Cr

Co

Al

GST

Method blanks <LOD/LOQ; one method blank 24h above LOQ but at least 19 fold lower than the concentrations in samples

<LOD

<LOD/LOQ

GMB

Method blanks above LOQ but at least 2.04 fold lower than the concentrations in samples

Method blanks above LOQ but at least 13 fold lower than the concentrations in samples

Method blanks and samples are in the same concentration range

ALF

Method blanks above LOQ but at least 1.13 lower than the concentrations in samples

Method blanks above LOQ but at least 26 lower than the concentrations in samples

Method blanks above LOQ but at least 1.26 lower than the concentrations in samples

ASW

<LOD

<LOD

<LOD

PBS

<LOD; one method blank 2h above LOQ but at least 1.32 fold lower than concentrations in samples

Two method blanks 2h <LOQ, two method blanks 2h and all method blanks 24 above LOQ but at least 13 fold lower than the concentrations in samples

Method blanks 2h above LOQ but at least 0.19 fold lower than the concentrations in samples; three method blanks 24h <LOQ one above LOQ but at least 3.79 fold lower than concentrations in samples 24h

Concentration of chromium in artificial media, calculated nominal chromium concentration and dissolved amount of chromium:

media and sample

total Cr ± SD in method blanks [µg/L]

total Cr ±SD in sample vessels [µg/L]

Cr ± SD in sample vessels with blank subtraction [µg/L]

calculated nominal Cr concentration in [µg/L]#

dissolved amount Cr in artificial media [%] normalized for measured background in method blank

ALF 2h

7.71 ± 0.17

8.81 ± 0.02

1.11 ± 0.02

30412

0.004 ± <0.001

ALF 24h

7.75 ± 0.20

8.74 ± 0.10

0.99 ± 0.10

30412

0.003 ± <0.001

ASW 2h

<LOD

<LOD

<LOD

30379

-

ASW 24h

<LOD

0.27 ± 0.01

0.27 ± 0.01

30379

0.001 ± <0.001

GMB 2h

0.23

0.47 ± 0.01

0.24 ± 0.01

30309

0.001 ± <0.001

GMB 24h

0.24 ± 0.02

0.51 ± 0.05

0.28 ± 0.05

30309

0.001 ± <0.001

GST 2h

<LOD

0.55 ± 0.03

0.55 ± 0.03

30539

0.002 ± <0.001

GST 24h

0.05

0.94 ± 0.03

0.89 ± 0.03

30539

0.003 ± <0.001

PBS 2h

0.10

0.13 ± <0.01

0.03 ± <0.01

30545

0.0001

PBS 24h

<LOD

0.18 ± 0.03

0.18 ± 0.03

30545

0.001 ± <0.001

# (initial weight (e.g. 50 mg) * 30.04 § (percentage chromium in test item) / 100) * 2 (multiplication to calculate chromium amount in one litre -> 100 mg/L) = nominal chromium concentration in [mg/L] / 1000 = nominal chromium concentration in [µg/L]

§ according to CoA 43.90 % Cr as Cr2O3 => 68.42 % chromium in Cr2O3 => (43.90 % * 68.42 %) / 100% = 30.04 % Cr in test item

In five different artificial physiological media, between 0.0001 and 0.004 % of chromium was dissolved from the test item IPC-2013-009 cobalt chromite blue green spinel depending on solution parameters and test duration.

Concentration of cobalt in artificial media, calculated nominal cobalt concentration and dissolved amount of cobalt:

media and sample

total Co ± SD in method blanks [µg/L]

total Co ±SD in sample vessels [µg/L]

Co ± SD in sample vessels with blank subtraction [µg/L]

calculated nominal Co concentration in [µg/L]#

dissolved amount Co in artificial media [%] normalized for measured background in method blank

ALF 2h

0.25 ± 0.03

6.71 ± 0.04

6.45 ± 0.04

14973

0.04 ± <0.01

ALF 24h

0.25 ± 0.04

10.1 ± 0.16

9.89 ± 0.16

14973

0.07 ± <0.01

ASW 2h

<LOD

0.62 ± 0.13

0.62 ± 0.13

14957

0.004 ± 0.001

ASW 24h

<LOD

3.51 ± 0.03

3.51 ± 0.03

14957

0.02 ± <0.01

GMB 2h

0.03 ± 0.01

0.43 ± 0.07

0.39 ± 0.07

14923

0.003 ± <0.001

GMB 24h

0.02 ± <0.01

0.40 ± <0.01

0.37 ± <0.01

14923

0.003 ± <0.001

GST 2h

<LOD

5.40 ± 0.29

5.40 ± 0.29

15036

0.04 ± <0.01

GST 24h

<LOD

8.88 ± 0.41

8.88 ± 0.41

15036

0.06 ± <0.01

PBS 2h

0.03

0.37 ± 0.02

0.34 ± 0.02

15038

0.002 ± <0.001

PBS 24h

0.03 ± 0.01

2.15 ± 0.05

2.13 ± 0.05

15038

0.01 ± <0.01

# (initial weight (e.g. 50 mg) * 14.79 § (percentage cobalt in test item) / 100) * 2 (multiplication to calculate cobalt amount in one litre --> 100 mg/L) = nominal cobalt concentration in [mg/L] / 1000 = nominal cobalt concentration in [µg/L]

§ according to CoA 18.80 % Co as CoO => 78.65 % cobalt in CoO => (18.80 % * 78.65 %) / 100 % = 14.79 % Co in test item

In five different artificial physiological media, between 0.002 and 0.07 % of cobalt was dissolved from the test item IPC-2013-009 cobalt chromite blue green spinel depending on solution parameters and test duration.

Concentration of aluminium in artificial media, calculated nominal aluminium concentration and dissolved amount of aluminium:

media and sample

total Al ± SD in method blanks [µg/L]

total Al ±SD in sample vessels [µg/L]

Al ± SD in sample vessels with blank subtraction [µg/L]

calculated nominal Al concentration in [µg/L]#

dissolved amount Al in artificial media [%] normalized for measured background in method blank

ALF 2h

20.7 ± 0.80

26.1 ± 0.69

5.43 ± 0.69

9537

0.06 ± 0.01

ALF 24h

6.52 ± 2.19

30.0 ± 0.81

23.5 ± 0.81

9537

0.25 ± 0.01

ASW 2h

<LOD

<LOD

<LOD

9526

-

ASW 24h

<LOD

<LOD

<LOD

9526

-

GMB 2h

30.8 ± 3.40

19.5 ± 1.69

-

9504

-

GMB 24h

18.6 ± 0.02

18.2 ± 1.64

0.76 ± 0.74

9504

0.01

GST 2h

<LOQ

11.0 ± 0.44

11.0 ± 0.44

9576

0.12 ± 0.01

GST 24h

<LOD

17.5 ± 1.01

17.5 ± 1.01

9576

0.18 ± 0.01

PBS 2h

6.75 ± 0.19

1.30

-

9578

-

PBS 24h

1.51

5.71 ± 0.43

4.21 ± 0.43

9578

0.04 ± <0.01

# (initial weight (e.g. 50 mg) * 9.42 § (percentage aluminium in test item) / 100) * 2 (multiplication to calculate aluminium amount in one litre --> 100 mg/L) = nominal aluminium concentration in [mg/L] / 1000 = nominal aluminium concentration in [µg/L]

§ according to CoA 17.80 % Al as Al2O3 => 52.93 % aluminium in Al2O3 => (17.80 % * 52.93 %) / 100 % = 9.42 % Al in test item

In five different artificial physiological media, between 0.04 and 0.25 % of aluminium was dissolved from the test item IPC-2013-009 cobalt chromite blue green spinel depending on solution parameters and test duration.

Mass balance calculation

Total dissolved chromium and cobalt concentrations in vessels, filters and syringes measured by ICP-OES indicate an incomplete dissolution of the test item in all physiological media after addition of aqua regia to the sample vessels. The results and the recoveries of the nominal amount of the initial weight are compiled only fo cobalt. Chromium concentrations in mass balance samples were always below LOD or LOQ.

Calculation of cobalt mass balance

media

value for dissolved Co after addition ofaqua regia
[mg]

nominal
concentration
[mg] #

recovery
[%]

ALF 24h A

0.01

7.47

0.06

ALF 24h B

0.01

7.50

0.07

ASW 24h A

0.02

7.45

0.06

ASW 24h B

0.04

7.50

0.30

GMB 24h A

0.01

7.50

0.06

GMB 24h B

0.02

7.42

0.06

GST 24 A

0.01

7.52

0.08

GST 24h B

0.01

7.51

0.08

PBS 24h A

0.02

7.50

0.07

PBS 24h B

0.01

7.54

0.07

# nominal concentration Co = 18.80 % as CoO in test item = 78.65 % Co in CoO => 7.393 mg Co in 50 mg test item => 7.393 * initial weight / 50 mg

Conclusions:
The bioaccessibility of cobalt chromite blue green spinel has been investigated experimentally in vitro by simulating dissolution under physiological conditions considered to mimic the most relevant exposure routes (oral, dermal and inhalation). Dissolved Co, Al and Cr concentrations were below 9.89 µg/L, 23.5 µg/L and 1.11 µg/L, respectively, even at the highest loading of 0.1 g/L, referring to a solubility of 0.01 %, 0.024 % and 0.001 %, respectively, the pigment is considered biologically inert.
Executive summary:

The bioaccessibility of Co, Al, and Cr has been investigated experimentally in vitro by simulating dissolution under physiological conditions considered to mimic the most relevantexposure routes (oral, dermal and inhalation), as follows:

- Gamble’s solution (GMB, pH 7.4) which mimics the interstitial fluid within the deep lung under normal health conditions,

- Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), which is a standard physiological solution that mimics the ionic strength of human blood serum,

- Artificial sweat (ASW, pH 6.5) which simulates the hypoosmolar fluid, linked to hyponatraemia (loss of Na+ from blood), which is excreted from the body upon sweating,

- Artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF, pH 4.5), which simulates intracellular conditions in lung cells occurring in conjunction with phagocytosis and represents relatively harsh conditions and

- Artificial gastric fluid (GST, pH 1.5), which mimics the very harsh digestion milieu of high acidity in the stomach.

In total dissolved Co, Al, and Cr concentrations were below 9.89 µg/L, 23.5 µg/L and 1.11 µg/L respectively, even at the highest loading of 0.1g/L, referring to a solubility of 0.01 %, 0.024 % and 0.001 %, respectively, the pigment is considered biologically inert.

Endpoint:
basic toxicokinetics in vitro / ex vivo
Remarks:
Bioaccessibility - transformation/dissolution in artificial physiological media
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2016-04-28 to 2016-11-11
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study
Objective of study:
bioaccessibility (or bioavailability)
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 29 (23-Jul-2001): Guidance document on transformation/dissolution of metals and metal compounds in aqueous media
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Bioaccessibility testing: loading of 100 mg/L; five artificial physiological media agitated at 100 rpm, at 37 °C ± 2 °C; sampling after 2h and 24h; determination of Al, Cr, Co and Zn concentrations after filtration by ICP-OES and ICP-MS.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
An internationally agreed guideline does not exist for this test (e.g. OECD). However, similar tests have been conducted with several metal compounds, including steels, in previous risk assessments (completed under Regulation (EEC) No 793/93) and in recent preparation for REACH regulation (EC) No 1907/2006. The test was performed on the basis of the guidance for OECD-Series on testing and assessment Number 29 and according to the bioaccessibility test protocol provided by the study monitor.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
signed, 2015-12-16
Species:
other: in vitro (simulated human body fluids)
Details on exposure:
Test principle in brief:
- five different artificial physiological media,
- single loading of test substance of 100 mg/L,
- samples taken after 2 and 24 hours agitation (100 rpm) at 37 ± 2 °C,
- two method blanks per artificial media were tested; measurement (by ICP-OES and ICP-MS) of dissolved aluminum, chromium, cobalt and zinc concentrations after filtration (0.2 µm, Supor membrane)
- the study was performed in triplicates

The aim of this test was to assess the dissolution of IPC-2013-011 (Cobalt chromite blue green spinel) in five artificial physiological media: Artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF, pH = 4.5), Artificial sweat solution (ASW, pH = 6.5), Gamble´s solution (GMB, pH = 7.4), Artificial gastric fluid (GST, pH = 1.5), Phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.4). The test media were selected to simulate relevant human-chemical interactions (as far as practical), i.e. a substance entering the human body by ingestion into the gastrointestinal tract and by inhalation.
Duration and frequency of treatment / exposure:
Samples were taken after 2 h and 24h.
Dose / conc.:
100 other: mg of the test item /L artificial media
Details on study design:
Reagents
The water (resistivity >18 MΩ·cm.) used for this test was purified with a Pure Lab Ultra water purification system from ELGA LabWater, Celle, Germany.
- Nitric acid - “Supra” quality (ROTIPURAN® supplied by Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany).
- Hydrochloric acid – “instra-analyzed plus” quality (J.T. Baker, Griesheim, Germany).

Metal analysis
- Standards: Single element standards (Merck Certipur Aluminium ICP standard 1000 mg/L lot no. HC388610; Merck Certipur Chromium ICP standard 1000 mg/L lot no. HC386521; Merck Certipur Cobalt ICP standard 1000 mg/L lot no. HC41722713; Merck Certipur Zinc ICP standard 1000 mg/L lot no. HC43663769; Darmstadt, Germany).
- certified reference materials: TM-25.4 (lot no. 0914), TM-26.4 (lot no. 1115), TMDA-52.4 (lot no. 0615) and TMDA-54.5 (lot no. 0815) obtained from Environment Canada and a multielement standard (Merck IV, lot no. HC54938555, Darmstadt, Germany)

Instrumental and analytical set-up for the ICP-OES instrument:
Agilent 720, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany
Nebulizer: Sea spray nebulizer from Agilent
Spray chamber: Glass cyclonic spray chamber from Agilent
Carrier gas flow: 0.75 L/min
RF power: 1200W
Wavelengths: Al: 167.019 nm and 396.152 nm / Cr: 267.716 nm, 283.563 nm and 284.325 nm / Co: 231.160 nm, 237.863 nm and 238.892 nm / Zn: 202.548 nm, 206.200 nm and 213.857 nm
Calibration: blank, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 μg/L.
Correlation coefficients (r): at least 0.996856.
The applied LOD/LOQ calculations for the Agilent 720 ICP-OES are (according to DIN 32645):
LOD: 3 x standard deviation of calibration blank/slope of the calibration
LOQ: 3 x LOD

Instrumental and analytical set-up for the ICP-MS instrument:
Agilent 7700ce ICP-MS, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn Germany
Nebulizer: Conical nebulizer, from Glass Expansion
Spray chamber: Scott Type spray chamber, from Agilent
Carrier gas flow: 0.93 L/min
Dilution Gas flow: 0.11 L/min
RF power: 1500 W
Isotopes: 27Al, 52Cr, 53Cr, 59Co, 66Zn, 68Zn and 103Rh (internal standard)
calibrate the instrument: blank, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50 μg/L
The applied LOD/LOQs were calculated as follows:
LOD: 3 x standard deviation of calibration blank divided by the slope of calibration line;
LOQ: 3 x LOD.
The data for the LODs were read directly from the Agilent 7700 ICP-MS instrument output (data calculated by internal algorithms of the instrument software).
Details on dosing and sampling:
Loading:
The nominal loading in this test was 100 mg/L. However, due to weighing uncertainties the actual loadings range from 100.024 mg/L to 101.014 mg/L in the test vessels.
Type:
other: Bioaccessibility
Results:
Higest dissolution at a loading of 0.1g/L after 24h in ALF: Al: 11.1 ± 0.51 µg/L, Cr: 0.985 ± 0.075 µg/L, Co: 7.60 ± 0.14 µg/L, Zn: 1.59 ± 0.65 µg/L; in GST: Al: 13.1 ± 0.48 µg/L, Cr: 0.697 ± 0.010 µg/L, Co: 8.35 ± 0.29 µg/L, Zn: 4.75 ± 0.23 µg/L

Method validation summary ICP-OES

validation parameter results comment
Selectivity similar data with different wavelengths for ICP-OES method -
Linearity applied calibration functions were linear coefficient at least 0.996856

Limit of detection

Al: 0.099 – 0.387 μg/L

Cr: 0.185 μg/L

Co: 0.371 – 1.57 μg/L

Zn: 0.149 – 0.883 μg/L

-

Limit of quantification

Al: 0.298 – 1.16 μg/L

Cr: 0.555 μg/L

Co: 1.11 – 4.76 μg/L

Zn: 0.448 – 2.65 μg/L

-

Method blanks

Aluminium: 

- GST: All samples below LOD

- GMB All samples above LOQ: 2h: 5.08 ± 0.06 μg/L; 24h:5.42 ± 1.23 μg/L

- PBS: All samples below LOD

- ASW All samples below LOD

Cobalt:

- GST: All samples below LOD

Zinc:

- GST: All samples above LOQ: 2h: 1.75 ± 0.60 μg/L; 24h: 2.09 ± 0.34 μg/L

- GMB: All samples below LOD

- PBS: 2h samples below LOD/LOQ; 24h samples one below LOQ, three samples above LOQ: 0.95 ± 0.05 μg/L

- ASW: All samples above LOQ: 2h: 1.49 ± 0.15 μg/L; 24h: 2.90 ± 1.05 μg/L

Accuracy measurement /

Reproducibility test sample measurements

Mean recovery for CRM TM- 25.4

(dilution factor 10):

Al: 104 ± 6.4 (n = 8)

Co: 99.9 ± 5.5 (n = 4)

Low concentration range

(certified with 30.1 μg Al/L,diluted 3.01 μg Al/L;

27.5 μg Co/L, diluted 2.75 μg Co/L)

Accuracy measurement /

Reproducibility test sample measurements

 Mean recovery for CRM TMDA- 52.4

(dilution factor 10):

Al: 102 ± 2.1 (n = 16)

Co: 99.9 ± 1.7 (n = 4)

Zn: 101 ± 2.9 (n = 16)

Mid concentration range

(certified with 306 μg Al/L, diluted 30.6 μg Al/L;

127 μg Co/L, diluted 12.7 μg Co/L;

306 μg Zn/L, diluted 30.6 μg Zn/L)

Accuracy measurement /

Reproducibility test sample measurements

Mean recovery for CRM TMDA- 54.5

(dilution factor 100):

Zn: 104 ± 9.1 (n = 16)

Low concentration range

(certified with 546 μg Zn/L, diluted 5.46 μg Zn/L)

Accuracy measurement /

Reproducibility mass balance sample measurements

Mean recovery for CRM TMDA- 52.4

(dilution factor 10):

Al: 104 ± 1.5 (n = 3)

Co: 94.7 ± 0.2 (n = 3)

Cr: 101 ± 0.6 (n = 3)

Zn: 97.2 ± 2.8 (n = 3)

Mid concentration range

(certified with 306 μg Al/L, diluted 30.6 μg Al/L;

127 μg Co/L, diluted 12.7 μg Co/L;

158 mg Cr/L, diluted 15.8 μg Cr/L;

306 μg Zn/L, diluted 30.6 μg Zn/L)

Accuracy measurement /

Reproducibility mass balance sample measurements

Mean recovery for CRM TMDA- 54.5

(dilution factor 100):

Cr: 103 ± 2.8 (n = 3)

Zn: 89.4 ± 4.6 (n = 3)

Low concentration range

(certified with 546 μg Zn/L, diluted 5.46 μg Zn/L;

438 mg Cr/L, diluted 4.38 μg Cr/L)

Trueness test sample measurements

Quality control standard (Merck IV):

Al: 103 ± 2.1 (n = 8)

Zn: 100 ± 2.2 (n = 12)

Mid concentration range (20 μg/L)

Trueness test sample measurements

Quality control standard (Merck IV):

Al: 103 ± 2.3 (n = 8)

Co: 100 ± 2.0 (n = 4)

Zn: 95.5 ± 2.3 (n = 4)

Mid concentration range (25 μg/L)

Trueness mass balance

sample measurements

Quality control standard (Merck IV):

Al: 107 ± 2.9 (n = 4)

Cr: 99.4 ± 1.3 (n = 4)

Co: 97.1 ± 0.9 (n = 4)

Zn: 94.3 ± 1.0 (n = 4)

Mid concentration range (20 μg/L)

Trueness mass balance

sample measurements

Quality control standard (Merck IV):

Al: 99.2 ± 0.4 (n = 4)

Cr: 95.8 ± 0.8 (n = 4)

Co: 96.2 ± 0.6 (n = 4)

Zn: 97.3 ± 1.6 (n = 4)

High concentration range (75 μg/L)

Trueness test sample measurements

Recalibration standard

Al: 108 ± 4.9 (n = 16)

Co: 99.1 ± 0.6 (n = 4)

Zn: 103 ± 6.1 (n = 16)

Low concentration range (10 μg/L)

Trueness mass balance

sample measurements

Recalibration standard

Al: 115 ± 3.8 (n = 3)

Cr: 100 ± 2.1 (n = 4)

Co: 96.0 ± 1.4 (n = 4)

Zn: 87.0 ± 3.3 (n = 4)

Low concentration range (10 μg/L)

Trueness mass balance

sample measurements

Recalibration standard

Al: 102 ± 0.9 (n = 4)

Cr: 98.7 ± 1.3 (n = 4)

Co: 97.9 ± 1.3 (n = 4)

Zn: 96.5 ± 1.3 (n = 4)

High concentration range (50 μg/L)

Trueness test samples

Fortification of samples:

Al: 104 – 114 %

Co: 101 %

Zn: 101 – 115 %

-

Trueness mass balance

sample measurements

Fortification of samples:

Al: 94.1 – 105 %

Cr: 86.1 – 111 %

Co: 86.2 – 109 %

Zn: 97.5 – 113 %

-

Method validation summary ICP-MS

validation

parameter results

comment

Selectivity

similar data with two different gas modes or two different Isotopes and same gas mode

-

Linearity

applied calibration functions were linear

correlation coefficient at least 0.998835

Limit of detection

Al: 0.05 – 0.336 μg/L

Cr: 0.002 – 0.135 μg/L

Co: 0.001 – 0.006 μg/L

Zn: 0.474 μg/L

-

Limit of quantification

Al: 0.15 – 1.012 μg/L

Cr: 0.006 – 0.404 μg/L

Co: 0.003 – 0.019 μg/L

Zn: 1.42 μg/L

-

Accuracy measurement /

Reproducibility test sample measurements

Mean recovery for CRM TM- 25.4

(dilution factor 2 and 10):

Al: 102 ± 7.3 (n = 4) Cr: 90.6 ± 6.2 (n = 12)

Co: 99.3 ± 3.1 (n = 12)

Zn: 109 ± 1.5 (n = 4)

Low concentration range

(certified with 30.1 μg Al/L, diluted 3.01 μg Al/L;

24.0 μg Cr/L, diluted 12.0 and 2.40 μg Cr/L;

27.5 μg Co/L, diluted 13.75 and 2.75 μg Co/L;

44.5 μg Zn/L, diluted 4.45 μg Zn/L)

Accuracy measurement /

Reproducibility test sample measurements

Mean recovery for CRM TM- 26.4

(dilution factor 4):

Cr: 86.8 ± 4.4 (n = 3)

Co: 97.3 ± 2.9 (n = 4)

Low concentration range

(certified with 12.4 μg Cr/L, diluted 3.10 μg Cr/L;

8.1 μg Co/L, diluted

2.03 μg Co/L)

Accuracy measurement /

Reproducibility test sample measurements

Mean recovery for CRM TMDA- 54.5

(dilution factor 100):

Al: 111 (n = 1)

Cr: 98.8 ± 0.4 (n = 4)

Low concentration range

(certified with 399 μg Al/L, diluted 3.99 μg Al/L;

438 μg Cr/L, diluted 4.38 μg Cr/L)

Accuracy measurement /

Reproducibility test sample measurements

Mean recovery for CRM TMDA- 52.4

(dilution factor 10 and 20 only for Al):

Al: 103 ± 6.0 (n = 5)

Cr: 99.7 ± 3.2 (n = 20)

Co: 99.5 ± 3.0 (n = 16)

Zn: 101 ± 1.3 (n = 4)

Mid to high concentration range

(certified with 306 μg Al/L,

diluted 30.6 and 15.3 μg Al/L;

158 μg Cr/L, diluted 15.8 μg Cr/L;

127 μg Co/L, diluted 12.7 μg Co/L;

256 μg Zn/L, diluted 25.6 μg Zn/L)

Trueness test samples

Quality control standard (Merck IV):

Al: 99.7 ± 4.3 (n = 5)

Cr: 99.2 ± 5.4 (n = 19)

Co: 98.4 ± 5.4 (n = 15)

Zn: 102 ± 1.8 (n = 4)

High concentration range (25 μg/L)

Trueness test samples

Recalibration standard:

Al: 102 ± 4.5 (n = 4)

Cr: 99.6 ± 7.0 (n = 20)

Co: 98.3 ± 3.2 (n = 16)

Zn: 104 ± 1.9 (n = 3)

Mid concentration range (10 μg/L)

Trueness test samples

Fortification of samples:

Al: 99.6 – 101 %

Cr: 90.0 – 102 %

Co: 93.6 – 100 %

Zn: 101 – 105 %

-

 Method blanks

Chromium:

- GST: All samples below LOD

- ALF: All samples below LOQ

- ASW: All samples below LOD

- PBS All samples below LOD

- GMB All samples below LOD

Cobalt:

- ALF: Three 2h samples below LOQ, one sample above LOQ: 0.013 ± 0.003 μg/L; 24h samples all below LOD/LOQ

- ASW: All samples below LOD

- PBS: All samples above LOQ: 2h: 0.009 ± 0.007 μg/L; 24h: 0.007 ± 0.005 μg/L

- GMB: 2h samples all below LOD/LOQ, two samples 24h below LOQ, two samples above LOQ: 0.006 ± 0.002 μg/L

Zinc:

- ALF: All samples above LOQ: 2h: 3.39 ± 0.32 μg/L; 24h: 4.53 ± 0.79 μg/L

Concentration of dissolved aluminium in artificial physiological media

media and sample

LOD/LOQ of Al measurement series [µg/L]

total Al ± SD in method blanks [µg/L]

Without method blank subtraction

With mean method blank subtraction (mean of 2h and/or 24h)

total Al ± SD in sample vessels [µg/L]

total Al ± SD in sample vessels [µg/L]*

total Al ± SD in sample vessels [µg/L]

total Al ± SD in sample vessels [µg/L]*

GST 2h

LOD: 0.387

LOQ: 1.16

all method blanks below LOD

10.0 ± 0.28

9.95 ± 0.26

No subtraction

No subtraction

GST 24h

LOD: 0.387

LOQ: 1.16

all method blanks below LOD

13.2 ± 0.51

13.1 ± 0.48

No subtraction

No subtraction

GMB 2h

LOD: 0.193

LOQ: 0.580

5.08 ± 0.06

6.61 ± 1.21

6.61 ± 1.21

2.38 ± 2.44

2.38 ± 2.44

GMB 24h

LOD: 0.193

LOQ: 0.580

5.42 ± 1.23

5.77 ± 0.31

5.76 ± 0.31

0.349 ± 0.309

0.349 ± 0.308

ALF 2h

LOD: 0.336

LOQ: 1.01

all method blanks below LOD/LOQ

8.73 ± 0.35

8.67 ± 0.32

No subtraction

No subtraction

ALF 24h

LOD: 0.336

LOQ: 1.01

0.944 ± 0.316

(two method blanks below LOQ; two above LOQ)

12.1 ± 0.52

12.1 ± 0.51

11.2 ± 0.52

11.1 ± 0.51

ASW 2h

LOD: 0.260

LOQ: 0.779

all method blanks below LOD

All samples below LOD/LOQ

All samples below

LOD/LOQ

No subtraction

No subtraction

ASW 24h

LOD: 0.260

LOQ: 0.779

all method blanks below LOD

1.95 ± 0.70

1.94 ± 0.70

No subtraction

No subtraction

PBS 2h

LOD: 0.099

LOQ: 0.298

all method blanks below LOD

all samples below LOD

all samples below

LOD

No subtraction

No subtraction

PBS 24h

LOD: 0.099

LOQ: 0.298

all method blanks below LOD

0.346 ± 0.478

(one sample above LOQ; one sample above LOD; four samples below LOD)

0.345 ± 0.476

No subtraction

No subtraction

*(corrected concentrations, corresponding to a loading of exactly 100 mg/L)

CALCULATION (performed by the monitor)

- calculated nominal concentration of Al: 100 % (test item) / 9.42 % § (Al in test item) * 100 mg/L (initial weight) = 9.42 mg Al/L

- highest dissolved amount in artificial media of Al: 100 % / 9.42 mg/L * 0.0131 mg/L (GST 24h: 13.1 ± 0.48 µg/L) = 0.1391 %

- lowest dissolved amount in artificial media of Al: 100 % / 9.42 mg/L * 0.000345 mg/L (PBS 24h: 0.345 ± 0.476 µg/L) = 0.0037 %

§ according to CoA 17.80 % Al as Al2O3=> 52.93 % aluminium in Al2O3=> (17.80 % * 52.93 %) / 100 % = 9.42 % Al in test item

In five different artificial physiological media, between 0.0036 and 0.1391 % of aluminium was dissolved from the test item IPC-2013-009 cobalt chromite blue green spinel depending on solution parameters and test duration.

Concentration of dissolved chromium in artificial physiological media (no method blank subtraction – all method blanks below LOD/LOQ)

media and sample

LOD/LOQ of Cr measurement series [µg/L]

total Cr ± SD in method blanks [µg/L]

total Cr ± SD in sample vessels [µg/L] without method blank

total Cr ± SD in sample vessels [µg/L] (corrected concentrations, corresponding to a loading of exactly 100 mg/L)

GST 2h

LOD: 0.003

LOQ: 0.008

all method blanks below LOD

0.450 ± 0.021

0.448 ± 0.021

GST 24h

LOD: 0.003

LOQ: 0.008

all method blanks below LOD

0.701 ± 0.010

0.697 ± 0.010

GMB 2h

LOD: 0.017

LOQ: 0.050

all method blanks below LOD

0.111 ± 0.030

0.125 ± 0.010

GMB 24h

LOD: 0.017

LOQ: 0.050

all method blanks below LOD

0.111 ± 0.030

0.125 ± 0.010

ALF 2h

LOD: 0.135

LOQ: 0.404

all method blanks below LOQ

0.769 ± 0.041

0.763 ± 0.039

ALF 24h

LOD: 0.135

LOQ: 0.404

all method blanks below LOQ

0.991 ± 0.073

0.985 ± 0.075

ASW 2h

LOD: 0.002

LOQ: 0.006

all method blanks below LOD

0.206 ± 0.049

0.205 ± 0.049

ASW 24h

LOD: 0.002

LOQ: 0.006

all method blanks below LOD

0.318 ± 0.027

0.317 ± 0.027

PBS 2h

LOD: 0.025

LOQ: 0.075

all method blanks below LOD

0.145 ± 0.024

0.144 ± 0.025

PBS 24h

LOD: 0.025

LOQ: 0.075

all method blanks below LOD

0.244 ± 0.038

0.243 ± 0.038

CALCULATION (performed by the monitor)

- calculated nominal concentration of Cr: 100 % (test item) / 30.4 % § (Cr in test item) * 100 mg/L (initial weight) = 30.4 mg Cr/L

- highest dissolved amount in artificial media of Cr: 100 % / 30.4 mg/L * 0.000985 mg/L (ALF 24h: 0.985 ± 0.075 µg/L) = 0.0032 %

- lowest dissolved amount in artificial media of Cr: 100 % / 30.4 mg/L * 0.000125 mg/L (GMB 24h: 0.125 ± 0.010 µg/L)= 0.000411 %

§ according to CoA 43.90 % Cr as Cr2O3==> 68.42 % chromium in Cr2O3==> (43.90 % * 68.42 %) / 100 % = 30.04 % Cr in test item

In five different artificial physiological media, between 0.000411 and 0.0032 % of chromium was dissolved from the test item IPC-2013-009 cobalt chromite blue green spinel depending on solution parameters and test duration.

Concentration of dissolved cobalt in artificial physiological media

media and sample

LOD/LOQ of Co measurement series [µg/L]

total Co ± SD in method blanks [µg/L]

Without method blank subtraction

With mean method blank subtraction (mean of 2h and/or 24h)

total Co ± SD in sample vessels [µg/L]

total Co ± SD in sample vessels [µg/L]*

total Co ± SD in sample vessels [µg/L]

total Co ± SD in sample vessels [µg/L]*

GST 2h

LOD: 0.371

LOQ: 1.11

all method blanks below LOD

5.89 ± 0.11

5.86 ± 0.12

No subtraction

No subtraction

GST 24h

LOD: 0.371

LOQ: 1.11

all method blanks below LOD

8.39 ± 0.30

8.35 ± 0.29

No subtraction

No subtraction

GMB 2h

LOD: 0.002

LOQ: 0.007

all method blanks below LOD/LOQ

0.357 ± 0.094

0.357 ± 0.094

No subtraction

No subtraction

GMB 24h

LOD: 0.002

LOQ: 0.007

0.006 ± 0.002

(Two method blank above LOQ; two method blanks below LOQ)

0.642 ± 0.035

0.642 ± 0.035

0.636 ± 0.035

0.636 ± 0.035

ALF 2h

LOD: 0.006

LOQ: 0.017

0.013 ± 0.003

(One method blank above LOQ; three method blanks below LOQ)

4.42 ± 0.23

4.39 ± 0.22

4.41 ± 0.23

4.38 ± 0.22

ALF 24h

LOD: 0.006

LOQ: 0.017

all method blanks below LOD/LOQ

7.65 ± 0.16

7.60 ± 0.14

No subtraction

No subtraction

ASW 2h

LOD: 0.006

LOQ: 0.019

all method blanks below LOD

0.641 ± 0.088

0.639 ± 0.088

No subtraction

No subtraction

ASW 24h

LOD: 0.006

LOQ: 0.019

all method blanks below LOD

3.34 ± 0.05

3.32 ± 0.05

No subtraction

No subtraction

PBS 2h

LOD: 0.001

LOQ: 0.003

0.009 ± 0.007

(all method blanks above LOQ)

0.306 ± 0.052

0.304 ± 0.053

0.297 ± 0.052

0.296 ± 0.053

PBS 24h

LOD: 0.001

LOQ: 0.003

0.007 ± 0.005

(all method blanks above LOQ)

1.94 ± 0.07

1.93 ± 0.07

1.93 ± 0.07

1.92 ± 0.07

* (corrected concentrations, corresponding to a loading of exactly 100 mg/L)

CALCULATION (performed by the monitor)

- calculated nominal concentration of Co: 100 % (test item) / 14.79 % § (Co in test item) * 100 mg/L (initial weight) = 14.79 mg Co/L

- highest dissolved amount in artificial media of Co: 100 % / 14.79 mg/L * 0.00835 mg/L (GST 24h: 8.35 ± 0.29 µg/L) = 0.0564 %

- lowest dissolved amount in artificial media of Co: 100 % / 14.79 mg/L * 0.000296 mg/L (PBS 2h: 0.296 ± 0.053 µg/L)= 0.0020 %

§ according to CoA 18.80 % Co as CoO ==> 78.65 % cobalt in CoO ==> (18.80 % * 78.65 %) / 100 % = 14.79 % Co in test item

In five different artificial physiological media, between 0.0020 and 0.0564 % of cobalt was dissolved from the test item IPC-2013-009 cobalt chromite blue green spinel depending on solution parameters and test duration.

Concentration of dissolved zinc in artificial physiological media

media and sample

LOD/LOQ of Zn measurement series [µg/L]

total Zn ± SD in method blanks [µg/L]

Without method blank subtraction

With mean method blank subtraction (mean of 2h and/or 24h)

total Zn ± SD in sample vessels[µg/L]

total Zn ± SD in sample vessels [µg/L]*

total Zn ± SD in sample vessels[µg/L]

total Zn ± SD in sample vessels [µg/L]*

GST 2h

LOD: 0.224

LOQ: 0.672

1.75 ± 0.60

5.26 ± 0.87

5.23 ± 0.87

3.51 ± 0.87

3.49 ± 0.87

GST 24h

LOD: 0.224

LOQ: 0.672

2.09 ± 0.34

6.52 ± 0.24

6.49 ± 0.23

4.77 ± 0.24

4.75 ± 0.23

GMB 2h

LOD: 0.333

LOQ: 0.998

all method blanks below LOD

all samples below LOD

all samples below LOD

No subtraction

No subtraction

GMB 24h

LOD: 0.333

LOQ: 0.998

all method blanks below LOD

all samples below LOD

all samples below LOD

No subtraction

No subtraction

ALF 2h

LOD: 0.474

LOQ: 1.42

3.39 ± 0.32

4.92 ± 0.97

4.88 ± 0.95

1.53 ± 0.97

1.52 ± 0.96

ALF 24h

LOD: 0.474

LOQ: 1.42

4.53 ± 0.79

6.13 ± 0.65

6.09 ± 0.66

1.60 ± 0.65

1.59 ± 0.65

ASW 2h

LOD: 0.162

LOQ: 0.485

1.49 ± 0.15

1.02 ± 0.53 µg/L

(four samples above LOQ; one sample below LOQ; one sample below LOD)

1.02 ± 0.53

0.473 ± 0.196

(two sample negative value after subtraction)

0.471 ± 0.195

ASW 24h

LOD: 0.162

LOQ: 0.485

2.90 ± 1.05

0.665 ± 0.267

(four samples above LOQ; two sample below LOQ)

0.662 ± 0.266

0.323 ± <0.001

(four sample negative value after subtraction)

0.322 ± <0.001

PBS 2h

LOD: 0.149

LOQ: 0.448

all method blanks below LOD/LOQ

0.295 ± 0.328

(one sample above LOQ; 5 samples below LOD)

0.293 ± 0.326

No subtraction

No subtraction

PBS 24h

LOD: 0.149

LOQ: 0.448

0.95 ± 0.05

(three method blanks above LOQ; one method blank below LOQ)

all samples below LOD

all samples below LOD

all samples below LOD

all samples below LOD

*(corrected concentrations, corresponding to a loading of exactly 100 mg/L)

CALCULATION (performed by the monitor)

- calculated nominal concentration of Zn: 100 % (test item) / 15.10 % § (Zn in test item) * 100 mg/L (initial weight) = 15.10 mg Zn/L

- highest dissolved amount in artificial media of Zn: 100 % / 15.10 mg/L * 0.0475 mg/L (GST 24h: 4.75 ± 0.23 µg/L) = 0.3146 %

- lowest dissolved amount in artificial media of Zn: 100 % / 15.10 mg/L * 0.000293 mg/L (PBS 2h: 0.293 ± 0.326 µg/L)= 0.00194 %

§ according to CoA 18.80 % Zn as ZnO ==> 80.3411 % zinc in ZnO ==> (18.80 % * 80.3411 %) / 100 % = 15.10 % Zn in test item

In five different artificial physiological media, between 0.00194 and 0.3146 % of zinc was dissolved from the test item IPC-2013-009 cobalt chromite blue green spinel depending on solution parameters and test duration.

Mass balance calculation

The mass balance dissolved aluminum, chromium, cobalt and zinc concentrations in vessels and filters as measured by ICP-OES indicate no complete dissolution of IPC-2013-009 in the physiological media after addition of aqua regia to the sample vessels. Due to the

observations during the mass balance test item was still visible which could be a result of insoluble parts of the test item.

Amount of aluminium in mass balance samples (vessels, filter/syringes and taken samples) for each media

Media

Value for dissolved Al after addition of

aqua regia

In samples

[mg]

Calculated value Al

[mg]*

nominal amount

[mg] #

recovery

[%]

Vessels [mg] Filters/syringes [mg]
GST vessel 1 0.009 0.00155 0.0010 0.011  4.746 0.242
GST vessel 2 0.008 0.00083 0.0009 0.010  4.732 0.213
GST vessel 3 0.009 0.00081 0.0009 0.010  4.726 0.219
GMB vessel 1 0.021 0.00097 0.0005 0.023  4.712 0.487
GMB vessel 2 0.032 0.00063 0.0005 0.034  4.717 0.712
GMB vessel 3 0.018 0.00066 0.0004 0.020  4.711 0.414
ALF vessel 1 0.005 0.00079 0.001 0.007  4.758 0.148
ALF vessel 2 0.006 0.00079 0.0009 0.007  4.729 0.156
ALF vessel 3 0.005 0.00062 0.0009 0.007  4.740 0.141
ASW vessel 1 0.009 0.00170 0.00005 0.010 4.728 0.219
ASW vessel 2 0.010 0.00110 0.00009 0.011  4.732 0.226
ASW vessel 3 0.008 0.00068 0.00010 0.009  4.725 0.196
PBS vessel 1 0.013 0.00115 0.00004 0.014

 4.729

0.299

PBS vessel 2

0.012

0.00087

0.00000

0.012

 4.742

0.263

PBS vessel 3

0.013

0.00061

0.00000

0.013

 4.737

0.278

* Measured dissolved Al includes the amount of aluminium in test solutions after addition of aqua regia, the amount of cobalt rinsed of used filters and syringe and the amount of cobalt removed with samples during the study.

Example: 0.009 mg (amount Al in vessels) + 0.00155 mg (amount Al in syringe/filters) + 0.001 mg (Al in samples) = 0.011 mg

# nominal amount Al = 17.80 % in test item (according to CoA) as Al2O3 -> 52.93 % Al in Al2O3 -> 4.71 mg Al in 50 mg test item -> nominal amount 4.71 mg * initial weight mg / 50 mg

Example: 4.71 mg Al * 50.507 mg test item / 50 mg = 4.758 mg Al

Amount of cobalt in mass balance samples (vessels, filter/syringes and taken samples) for each media

Media

Value for dissolved Co after addition of

aqua regia

In samples

[mg]

Calculated value Co

[mg]

Nominal amount

[mg] #

Recovery

[%]

Vessels [mg]

Filters/syringes [mg]

GST vessel 1

0.005

<LOD

0.0006

0.006

7.449

0.080

GST vessel 2

0.004

<LOD

0.0006

0.005

7.427

0.068

GST vessel 3 0.004 <LOD

0.0006

0.005

7.418

0.064

GMB vessel 1

0.004

<LOD

0.00003

0.004

7.395

0.050

GMB vessel 2

0.003

<LOD

0.00004

0.003

7.404

0.047

GMB vessel 3

0.004

<LOD

0.00004

0.004

7.395

0.048

ALF vessel 1

0.003

<LOD

0.0006

0.004

7.468

0.047

ALF vessel 2

0.003

<LOD

0.0006

0.003

7.422

0.045

ALF vessel 3

0.003

<LOD

0.0006

0.004

7.439

0.050

ASW vessel 1

0.003

<LOD

0.0002

0.004

7.420

0.049

ASW vessel 2

0.004

<LOD

0.0002

0.004

7.428

0.052

ASW vessel 3

0.004

<LOD

0.0002

0.004

7.416

0.051

PBS vessel 1

0.003

<LOD

0.0001

0.004

7.422

0.047

PBS vessel 2

0.003

<LOD

0.0001

0.003

7.442

0.047

PBS vessel 3

0.004

<LOD

0.0001

0.004

7.435

0.048

* Measured dissolved Al includes the amount of aluminium in test solutions after addition of aqua regia, the amount of cobalt rinsed of used filters and syringe and the amount of cobalt removed with samples during the study.

# nominal amount Co = 18.80 % in test item (according to CoA) as CoO -> 78.65 % Co in CoO ->7.39 mg Co in 50 mg test item ->nominal amount 7.39 mg * initial weight mg / 50 mg

Conclusions:
The bioaccessibility of cobalt chromite blue green spinel has been investigated experimentally in vitro by simulating dissolution under physiological conditions considered to mimic the most relevant exposure routes (oral, dermal and inhalation). Dissolved Al, Cr, Co and Zn concentrations were below 13.1 µg/L, 0.985 µg/L, 8.35 µg/L and 4.75 µg/L, respectively, even at the highest loading of 0.1 g/L, referring to a solubility of 0.013 %, 0.001 %, 0.008 % and 0.005 %, respectively, the pigment is considered biologically inert.
Executive summary:

The bioaccessibility of Al, Cr, Co and Zn has been investigated experimentally in vitro by simulating dissolution under physiological conditions considered to mimic the most relevantexposure routes (oral, dermal and inhalation), as follows:

- Gamble’s solution (GMB, pH 7.4) which mimics the interstitial fluid within the deep lung under normal health conditions,

- Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), which is a standard physiological solution that mimics the ionic strength of human blood serum,

- artificial sweat (ASW, pH 6.5) which simulates the hypoosmolar fluid, linked to hyponatraemia (loss of Na+ from blood), which is excreted from the body upon sweating,

- Artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF, pH 4.5), which simulates intracellular conditions in lung cells occurring in conjunction with phagocytosis and represents relatively harsh conditions and

- Artificial gastric fluid (GST, pH 1.5), which mimics the very harsh digestion milieu of high acidity in the stomach.

In total dissolved Al, Cr, Co and Zn concentrations were below 13.1 µg/L, 0.985 µg/L, 8.35 µg/L and 4.75 µg/L, respectively, even at the highest loading of 0.1 g/L, referring to a solubility of 0.013 %, 0.001 %, 0.008 % and  0.005 %, respectively, the pigment is considered biologically inert.

Description of key information

Dissolved Al, Cr, Co and Zn concentrations were below 13.1 µg/L, 0.985 µg/L, 8.35 µg/L and 4.75 µg/L, respectively, even at the highest loading of 0.1 g/L, referring to a solubility of 0.013 %, 0.001 %, 0.008 % and  0.005 %, respectively, the pigment is considered biologically inert.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Bioaccumulation potential:
no bioaccumulation potential

Additional information

Discussion on bioaccumulation potential result:

The chemical and physiological properties of the pigment cobalt chromite blue green spinel are dominated by inertness due to the characteristics of the production process (calcination at high temperatures, approximately 1000 °C), rendering the substance to be of a unique, stable crystalline structure. This fundamental process leads to a very low bioaccessibility for the elements contained in the pigment.

Knopf 2013

The bioaccessibility of Co, Al and Cr has been investigated experimentally in vitro by simulating dissolution under physiological conditions considered to mimic the most relevantexposure routes (oral, dermal and inhalation), as follows:

- Gamble’s solution (GMB, pH 7.4) which mimics the interstitial fluid within the deep lung under normal health conditions,

- Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), which is a standard physiological solution that mimics the ionic strength of human blood serum,

- Artificial sweat (ASW, pH 6.5) which simulates the hypoosmolar fluid, linked to hyponatraemia (loss of Na+ from blood), which is excreted from the body upon sweating,

- Artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF, pH 4.5), which simulates intracellular conditions in lung cells occurring in conjunction with phagocytosis and represents relatively harsh conditions and

- Artificial gastric fluid (GST, pH 1.5), which mimics the very harsh digestion milieu of high acidity in the stomach.

In total dissolved Co, Al, and Cr concentrationswere below 9.89 µg/L, 23.5 µg/L and 1.11 µg/L respectively, even at the highest loading of 0.1 g/L, referring to a solubility of 0.01 %, 0.024 % and 0.001 %, the pigment is considered biologically inert.

Knopf 2016

The bioaccessibility of Al, Cr, Co and Zn has been investigated experimentally in vitro by simulating dissolution under physiological conditions considered to mimic the most relevantexposure routes (oral, dermal and inhalation), as follows:

- Gamble’s solution (GMB, pH 7.4) which mimics the interstitial fluid within the deep lung under normal health conditions,

- Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), which is a standard physiological solution that mimics the ionic strength of human blood serum,

- Artificial sweat (ASW, pH 6.5) which simulates the hypoosmolar fluid, linked to hyponatraemia (loss of Na+ from blood), which is excreted from the body upon sweating,

- Artificial lysosomal fluid (ALF, pH 4.5), which simulates intracellular conditions in lung cells occurring in conjunction with phagocytosis and represents relatively harsh conditions and

- Artificial gastric fluid (GST, pH 1.5), which mimics the very harsh digestion milieu of high acidity in the stomach.

In total dissolved Al, Cr, Co and Zn concentrationswere below 13.1 µg/L, 0.985 µg/L, 8.35 µg/L and 4.75 µg/L respectively, even at the highest loading of 0.1g/L, referring to a solubility of 0.013 %, 0.001 %, 0.008 % and  0.005 %, the pigment is considered biologically inert.