Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 232-565-6 | CAS number: 9000-90-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 02 March 2010 - 31 May 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The ‘treat and plate’ treatment method was used in each test to avoid the possibility that bio-available histidine in the test item might compromise the test.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3.2.1.1
- IUPAC Name:
- 3.2.1.1
- Test material form:
- other: Liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Alpha amylase [Trichoderma reesei LOH4AkAApaA (paA-1)] (GICC 03387)
- Substance type: UVCB
- Physical state: pale yellow liquid
- Lot/batch No.: 168109001
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: February 2012
- Stability under test conditions: The test material and dilutions (50% and 25%) were stable for at least 5 hours at room temperature. Further, the test material was stable for at least 7 days at 4 degrees of C and 90 days at minus 20 degrees of C
- Storage condition of test material: minus 20 degrees of C
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- The study describes experiments performed to assess the effect of the test material alpha amylase in amino acid dependent strains of Salmonella typhimurium capable of detecting both induced frame-shift (TA1537 and TA98) and base-pair substitution mutations (TA1535, TA100 and TA102). The test system is a reverse mutation of amino acid dependent bacterial strains.
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 from Aroclor 1254 induced SPF Wistar rats, manufactured at LAB Research and validated in separate test.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Five dose levels (50, 160, 500, 1600, and 5000 μg/plate) were tested. All dose levels are expressed in terms of the total protein content of the test item supplied, being 46 mg/mL.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: sterile saline solution (0.9 % NaCl)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test substance is water-soluble and any human exposure will be in aqueous solutions.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Cumene hydroperoxide, sodium azide, 2-nitrofluorene, 9-aminoacridine, 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: All applications were done in medium before plating, i.e. a liquid culture assay (treat and plate assay).
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3.5 hrs (liquid culture assay)
- Incubation time (selective incubation) : 3 days
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Viable cell count - Evaluation criteria:
- The numbers of revertant colonies at each treatment test point were compared to the corresponding negative control values for each set of triplicate plates.
The tests were considered to be valid as all the following criteria were met:
- negative and positive control data were consistent with the historical control data for this laboratory
- the positive control data showed marked increases over the concurrent negative control values
- the evaluation of the data was not restricted by loss of plates (e.g. through contamination).
The test item would have been considered to have shown evidence of mutagenic activity in this study if all of the following criteria had been met:
- increases in the numbers of revertant colonies were observed at one or more test points
- the mean number of revertant colonies at the test point showing the largest increase was more than twice the corresponding negative control value
- there was a credible scientific explanation for the observed dose-response relationship that involved a mutagenic effect of the test item
- the increases were reproducible between replicate plates and were observed in both main tests (when treatment conditions were the same)
- the increases were statistically significant
- the increases were not directly related to increased growth of the non-revertant bacteria - Statistics:
- The numbers of revertant colonies at each treatment test point in the main tests were compared to the corresponding negative control values using the Analysis of Variance test. When this test showed statistically significant differences in the data, Dunnett’s test was used to determine the statistical significance of increases and decreases in the numbers of revertant colonies for each set of triplicate plates. The statistical analyses were performed with SAS® procedures (version 8.2) described in SAS/STAT® User’s Guide, SAS OnlineDoc®, 1999, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina 27513, USA.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: The test item was not toxic to the test bacteria, either in the absence or presence of S-9 mix: no marked reductions in the number of revertant colonies or growth of the background lawn of non-revertant bacteria were observed, compared to the negative control plates.
On the basis of these results, 5000 ug test substance/plate was chosen as the highest dose level for the main tests.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The negative and positive control values were compatible with the historical control values for this laboratory.- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- It was concluded, that the results of this Ames test study gave no indication of mutagenic activity of alpha-amylase.
- Executive summary:
Alpha-amylase was tested in two independent main tests. The ‘treat and plate’ treatment method was used in each test to avoid the possibility that bio-available histidine in the test item might compromise the test. Five dose levels (50, 160, 500, 1600, and 5000 μg/plate) were tested. Aliquots (200 μl/plate) of formulations of the test item mixed with sterile saline (0.9 % NaCl) were added to the bacteria. All dose levels are expressed in terms of the total protein content of the test item supplied, being 46 mg/ml. Negative control plates were treated with sterile saline (200 μl/plate). The treatments were performed both with and without a metabolic activation system (S-9 mix).
The test item was not toxic to the test bacteria at any dose level tested, either in the absence or presence of S-9 mix: no reductions in the growth of the background lawn of non-revertant bacteria or the number of revertant colonies were observed.
No biologically significant increases in the number of revertant colonies were observed at any dose level of the test item in either main test. Small, statistically significant increases in the number of revertant colonies were observed in the first main test in TA 1537 treated at 1600 and 5000 μg/plate in the presence of S-9 mix. These increases were not considered to be biologically significant and they did not meet the stated criteria for a mutagenic effect of the test item because they were too small (just 1.53 and 1.61-fold higher than the corresponding negative control values, respectively) and they were not reproduced in the second main test. No other statistically significant increases in the number of revertant colonies were observed in any test strain after treatment with the test item at any dose level either with or without S-9 mix.
The results obtained with the negative and positive controls demonstrated the sensitivity of the tests and the efficacy of the S-9 mix metabolic activation system.
Based on the results obtained in this study, it is concluded that alpha-amylase is not mutagenic in the Ames test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.