Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12.07.82 - 19.07.82
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
The animals were exposed under occlusion for 24 hours (instead of 4 hours under semi-occlusion: OECD404). This represents a worst case situation.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1982
Report date:
1982

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPP 81-5 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl) sebacate
EC Number:
258-207-9
EC Name:
Bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidyl) sebacate
Cas Number:
52829-07-9
Molecular formula:
C28H52N2O4
IUPAC Name:
bis(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl) sebacate
Details on test material:
- Physical state: solid

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Sex: male/female
- Source: Kleintierfarm Madoerin AG, CH4414, Fuellinsdorf
- Age: not indicated
- Weight at study initiation: 2-3 kg
- Housing: individually in metal cages.
- Diet: Rabbit food, NAFAG, No. 814 Tox, NAFAG AG, Gossau, SG, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 15
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Test system

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 ml
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hour(s)
Observation period:
7 days
Number of animals:
3/sex
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm on the back
The shaven skin on one side was slightly scarified with the help of a "Schroepfschnaepper", Aesculap, Switzerland.
- Type of wrap if used: The patches were covered with an impermeable material and were fastened to the body of the rabbit with adhesive tape.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): not indicated

SCORING SYSTEM: similar to OECD404

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24 h
Score:
0.7
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Remarks on result:
other: intact skin
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
48 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Remarks on result:
other: intact skin
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: intact skin
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Remarks on result:
other: intact skin
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
48 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: intact skin
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: intact skin
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Minimal erythema formation were observed (maximum score of 1) in 4/6 animals, reversible within 72 hours the latest. Minimal edema formation were observed (maximum score of 1) in 2/6 animals, reversible within 48 hours the latest. Exposure of the abraded skin gave similar results.
Other effects:
none reported

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Not irritating