Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 226-798-2 | CAS number: 5470-11-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian germ cell study: cytogenicity / chromosome aberration
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: abstracted from the summary published in the well-known publication, contributing to assessment
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- chromosome aberration assay
- Species:
- other: locusts
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- male locusts
- Route of administration:
- other: abdominal injection
- Vehicle:
- N/A
- Details on exposure:
- 0.05 ml hydroxylamine hydrochloride as a 0.1 M solution (equivalent to 350 µg) for 36hr
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 36 hr
- Frequency of treatment:
- once
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0.05 ml hydroxylamine hydrochloride as a 0.1 M solution (equivalent to 350 µg)
Basis:
nominal conc. - Control animals:
- yes
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Additional information on results:
- caused chromosome aberrations (breaks, fragmentation, bridge formation) in the spermatocytes
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): positive
It is concluded that hydroxylamine hydrochloride caused chromosome aberrations (breaks, fragmentation, bridge formation) in the spermatocytes based on the results given in this report. - Executive summary:
A single abdominal injection into male locusts of 0.05 ml hydroxylamine hydrochloride as a 0.1 M solution (equivalent to 350µg) caused chromosome aberrations (breaks, fragmentation, bridge formation) in the spermatocytes 36 hours later, effects which were not observed in the controls.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Additional information
All available studies covered the four endpoints (i.e. gene mutation test in bacteria, in vitro chromosome aberration test, gene mutation in mammalian cells and in vivo cytogenetic assay).
Gene mutation test in bacteria (Ames test):
In this study (Springer-verlag, 1994), Hydroxylamine hydrochloride did not induce point mutations in a Salmonella/microsome test in the strains TA 1535,TA 1536,TA 1537,TA 1538,TA 98 and TA 100 at a dose of 1000 and 5000 µg/plate, either with or without metabolic activation. Herbert S. Rosenkranz, 1979 gave the consistent conclusion.
However, G. M. Paronikyan, 1975 indicated that hydroxylammonium chloride caused positive mutagenic activity with Eschevichia coti P-678. And Scher, S.; Wecher, R.A, 1982 suggested the positive results with exposed PPL-1 cells. In contrast, these agents are inactive in the Salmonella/microsome test.
Gene mutation in mammalian cell:
William J. Caspary, et al 1988 demonstrated that Hydroxylamine HCI induced mutagenic response in the mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay. However, J.W.Harbell et al., 1987 suggested that HA caused negative mutation with and without metabolic activation under the conditions with and without metabolic activation (s-9).
Chromosome aberration in vitro:
Three reports were given to evaluate the gene mutation. G. Speit, C. Wick, and M. Wolf, 1980 indicated that HA produces only a slight increase in the number of SCEs and, after chronic treatment, prevents cell growth at concentrations above 5 × 10-4M. In another study (PRAMILA GUPTA and T. SHARMA, 1981), HA induced a very high frequency of damage in the secondary constriction regions of the chromosome pairs 1, X and Y2, and the frequency was slightly lower than this in the centromeres of 1, 2 and X chromosomes. J.W.Harbell et al.,1987 gave the contrary results that there is the lack of mutagenic action by HA but not the clastogenic or SEC inducing action of Hydroxylamine HCI.
In vivo chromosome aberration:
In vivo study was reported by Springer-verlag, 1994. A single abdominal injection into male locusts of 0.05 ml hydroxylamine hydrochloride as a 0.1 M solution (equivalent to 350µg) caused chromosome aberrations (breaks, fragmentation, bridge formation) in the spermatocytes 36 hours later, effects which were not observed in the controls.
Based on the total weight of evidence available, there are inconsistent results showed from in vitro data(i.e. positive or negative effects). However, in vivo data should be given more weight than that conducted in vitro. Thus, it is concluded that hydroxylamine hydrochloride can cause heritable genetic damage.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
Available data in vivo should be given more weight as its high relevance and reliability.
Justification for classification or non-classification
It is concluded that hydroxylamine hydrochloride can cause the positive mutagenic effects. Thus, test substance can be classified as category 2 for the mutagenicity according to CLP (EC No. 1272/2008).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.