Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1988
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
The study was conducted with chlorhexidine diacetate and not with the chlorhexidine base. Due to the fact that it is a simple salt form showing even a higher solubility and therefore a possibly higher dermal absorption, the results derived from this studies are considered to be predictive also for chlorhexidine base. This internal company report is not available for publicity. However, methods and results have been reported in a summarised format by Cal EPA and US EPA.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1988
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
Summary Of Toxicology Data. Chlorhexidine Diacetate
Author:
Cal EPA
Year:
2003
Bibliographic source:
Medical Toxicology Branch. Department Of Pesticide Regulation. California Environmental Protection Agency
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED). Chlorhexidine Diacetate
Author:
US EPA
Year:
1996
Bibliographic source:
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (OPPTS). United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Washington, D.C.

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
No detailed information available
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Chlorhexidine di(acetate)
EC Number:
200-302-4
EC Name:
Chlorhexidine di(acetate)
Cas Number:
56-95-1
IUPAC Name:
N',N'''''-hexane-1,6-diylbis[N-(4-chlorophenyl)(imidodicarbonimidic diamide)] diacetate
Details on test material:
-Purity: 97.7 %
-Lot/batch No.: R4796

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
-Age at study initiation: ca. 12 weeks
No further detailed information available

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Details on exposure:
The test substance was applied moistened with 2 ml of water to the intact dorsal dermal surface and the treatment area was covered with a gauze dressing and wrap.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
no
Duration of treatment / exposure:
13 consecutive weeks
Frequency of treatment:
6 h/d on 5 d/week
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/d
Basis:

No. of animals per sex per dose:
10 m / 10 f
Control animals:
yes
Details on study design:
The dose selection was justified as being a limit dose of 1000 mg/kg bw/d and choosing logarithmically spaced doses for the mid- and low-dermal doses.
No further detailed information available.

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
see below
Sacrifice and pathology:
No further detailed information available.
Statistics:
Fishers exact test

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Details on results:
Body weight and food consumption were slightly lowered during the initial 2 weeks of the study. At all doses minimal dermal irritation such as erythema, edema, desquamation and fissuring was observed. There were no adverse effects on ophthalmology or haematology.
In females treated with >= 500 mg/kg bw/d the activities of aspartate aminotransferase and of alanine aminotransferase were increased at the end of the study.
The incidence of hepatocellular degeneration/necrosis in males was 0, 0, 0, 1 and 0, 1, 5, and 7 in females. However, the liver necrosis was graded as minimal in all animals and the incidence of 1/10 at 250 mg/kg bw/d was not statistically significant.

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Effect level:
360 mg/kg bw/day
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: A dermal NOEL was not established as there were local effects at all doses in both sexes. For systemic effects a NOEL of 250 mg/kg bw/d (corresponding to 360 mg chlorhexidine digluconate/kg bw/d) was derived based on liver findings at higher doses.

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the assay, dermal application of chlorhexidine diacetate to rabbits for 13 weeks led to minimal liver necrosis in animals dosed with >= 500 mg/kg bw/d. A dose of 250 mg/kg bw/d was associated with local effects such as irritation but there were no statistically significant systemic effects.
Executive summary:

For chlorhexidine digluconate itself there are no standardized studies available performed according to recent guidelines. Therefore, data for chlorhexidine diacetate have been taken into further consideration.

In a 13 -week dermal toxicity study with NZW rabbits, chlorhexidine acetate was applied at doses of 0, 250, 500, or 1000 mg/kg bw/d to the intact dorsal dermal surface on 6 h/d and 5 d/week under occlusive conditions.

Body weight and food consumption were slightly lowered during the initial 2 weeks of the study. At all doses minimal dermal irritation such as erythema, edema, desquamation and fissuring was observed. There were no adverse effects on ophthalmology or haematology.

In females treated with >= 500 mg/kg bw/d the activities of aspartate aminotransferase and of alanine aminotransferase were increased at the end of the study.

The incidence of hepatocellular degeneration/necrosis in males was 0, 0, 0, 1 and 0, 1, 5, and 7 in females. However, the liver necrosis was graded as minimal in all animals and the incidence of 1/10 at 250 mg/kg bw/d was not statistically significant.

A dermal NOEL was not established as there were local effects at all doses in both sexes. For systemic effects a NOEL of 250 mg/kg bw/d (corresponding to 360 mg chlorhexidine digluconate/kg bw/d) was derived based on liver findings at higher doses.