Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 254-179-7 | CAS number: 38888-98-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute oral toxicity:
1,1-DPE was tested for acute oral toxicity according to OECD guideline 401 in groups of 3 male rats. Administration of up to 8.0 ml/kg orally resulted only in non-specific signs of treatment
The acute oral LD50 of 1,1-DPE was determined as > 8 ml/kg bw.
Acute toxicity via the inhalation route:
1,1-DPE was tested for acute toxicity via the inhalation route in a study similar to OECD guideline 403 for 1 hour.Two 1-hour exposures of 4 male rats/exposure to vapor of the test material generated at room temperature (calculated to contain 1.6 and 1.5 mg/l based on weight of samples before and after exposures) resulted in slight, transient eye irritation. At the end of the exposure period the rats were somewhat excitable. However, all rats appeared healthy and gained weight during the 2-week observation period. No lesions attributable to exposure to the test material were observed upon gross pathological examination 2 weeks after exposure.
Phenyl-tolyl-ethane was tested for acute toxicity via the inhalation route in a study according to OECD guideline 403 for 4 hours to two groups of five male and five female Wistar rats each group.The inhalatory LC50, 4h value of Phenyl-tolyl-ethane in Wistar rats was established to be within the range of 1 – 5 mg/L.
Acute dermal toxicity:
1,1-DPE was tested for acute dermal toxicity according to OECD guideline 402 in groups of 3 male rats. Administration of up to 4.0 ml/kg dermally resulted only in non-specific signs of treatment which were absent after 3 days. The acute dermal LD50 was established as > 4 ml/kg.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- No data
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: This study was conducted according to GLP and sufficient data is available for interpretation of results.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Sprague Dawler CFY
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Source: Interfauna (UK) Limited, Wyton, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire
The animals were housed in groups of three in solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with softwood sawdust. The animal room temperature were maintained at 19 to 25°C with 40 to 70% relative humidity. Artifical lighting provided 12 hours light and 12 hours darkness. The animals were acclimatised for at least three days before treatment and individually identified by ear punching and cage card. With the exception of an overnight fast immediately before treatment the animals had free access to food (Rat and Mouse Expanded Diet No. 1, Special Diet Services Limited, Witham, Essex, UK). Water was provided at all times from glass water bottles. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on oral exposure:
- Five groups, each of three fasted male rats were treated with dose levels of 8.0, 4.0, 2.0, 1.0 or 0.5 ml/kg or g/kg. Liquid test materials were used
undiluted. - Doses:
- 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 or 8.0 ml/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 3 male rats/dose
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- Five groups, each of three fasted male rats were treated with dose levels of 8.0, 4.0, 2.0, 1.0 or 0.5 ml/kg or g/kg. Liquid test materials were used
undiluted. Animals were observed for overt systemic toxicityy and mortality one and four hours after dosing and then at least once daily for seven days. Individual bodyweights were recorded on the day of treatment. No necropsies were performed. Using the mortality data an estimate of the acute oral LD50 of the test material was made. - Statistics:
- None
- Preliminary study:
- No data
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 8 mL/kg bw
- Mortality:
- No mortality
- Clinical signs:
- other: Animals at all dose levels showed hunched posture and pilo-erection on the day of dosing. Lethargy, decreased respiratory rate and ptosis were also noted in animals treated with 4.0 and 8.0 ml/kg. Animals treated with 2.0 ml/kg and below recovered to app
- Gross pathology:
- No data
- Other findings:
- None
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: EU GHS
- Conclusions:
- The estimated acute oral LD50 in the male rat was greater than 8.0 ml/kg.
- Executive summary:
Untreated DPE 75 (75% diphenyl ethane), a potential thermal oil, was provided for toxicity, testing by the Olefin Derivatives Department, DCE. It was tested for oral and dermal toxicity in groups of 3 male rats. Administration of up to 8.0 ml/kg orally resulted only in non-specific signs of treatment which were absent after 3 days.
Untreated DPE75 has very low toxicity by the oral route.
Reference
None
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 8 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- The key study is GLP-compliant and of high quality (Klimisch 1).
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2011-11-18 - 2012-01-26
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The GLP study was conducted according to an internationally accepted guideline. All study parameters are given in detail. Nevertheless, according to the ECHA's practical guide 6: "How to report read-across and categories" the maximum for read-cross is 2.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 403 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl:WI(Han)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Conditions
Animals were housed in a controlled environment, in which optimal conditions were considered to be approximately 15 air changes per hour, a temperature of 21.0 ± 3.0°C (actual range: 19.6 - 21.9°C), a relative humidity of 40-70% (actual range: 40 - 56%) and 12 hours artificial fluorescent light and 12 hours darkness per day.
Accommodation
Before exposure
Group housing of five animals per sex per cage in labelled Makrolon cages (type IV; height 18 cm) containing sterilised sawdust as bedding material (Litalabo, S.P.P.S., Argenteuil, France) and paper as cage-enrichment (Enviro-dri, Wm. Lillico & Son (Wonham Mill Ltd), Surrey, United Kingdom).
Acclimatisation period was at least 5 days before start of treatment under laboratory conditions.
After exposure
Group housing as described above, except that a paper sheet was introduced into the cage covering the bedding and cage enrichment to prevent suffocation in case of bad health condition. At the end of the Day of exposure the paper sheet was removed.
Diet
Free access to pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF® Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany) except during exposure to the test substance.
Water
Free access to tap water except during exposure to the test substance.
Animal husbandry on the Day of exposure
The animals were moved to the inhalation area to in order to perform the exposure. During the exposure, there was no access to food and water. After exposure, the animals were returned their cages which were placed in a fume cupboard for a short time period to allow test substance remnants to evaporate. A sheet of filter paper was used to cover the bedding material to prevent suffocation in case of bad health condition and in order to recover and to aid the clinical observations. The sheet was removed and before the end of the exposure day, the animals were returned to the animal room. - Route of administration:
- inhalation: aerosol
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- nose only
- Vehicle:
- air
- Details on inhalation exposure:
- The design of the exposure chamber is based on the flow past nose-only inhalation chamber (Am. Ind. Hyg Assoc. J. 44(12): 923-928, 1983). The chamber consisted of three animal sections with eight animal ports each. Each animal port had its own atmosphere inlet and exhaust outlet. The animals were placed in restraining tubes and connected to the animal ports. The number of animal sections and number of open inlets were adapted to the air flow in such a way that at each animal port the theoretical air flow was at least 1 L/min, which ensures an adequate oxygen supply to the animals. The main inlet of the test atmosphere was located at the top section and the main outlet was located at the bottom section. The direction of the flow of the test atmosphere guaranteed a freshly generated atmosphere for each individual animal.
All components of the exposure chamber in contact with the test material were made of stainless steel, glass, rubber or plastic. To avoid exposure of the personnel and contamination of the laboratory the exposure chamber was placed in a fume hood, which maintained at a slight negative pressure.
Fifteen minutes after the last animal was placed the generation of the test atmosphere was started. The exposure time was 4 hours.
Test atmosphere generation
The test substance was transferred to a nebulizer (LC SPRINT Baby rood, Pari, Starnberg, Germany) by means of a rotating pump (type VL500 digit, VERDER Lab Tec GmbH & Co. KG, Haan, Germany) and nebulized with pressurized air. The primary aerosol was diluted with humidified pressurized air and passed through the exposure chamber. The mean total airflow was 19 L/min for the 5 mg/L exposure group and 34 L/min for the 1 mg/L exposure group.
From the exposure chamber the test atmosphere was passed through a filter before it was released to the exhaust of the fume hood. - Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of exposure:
- 4 h
- Concentrations:
- Target concentrations were based on the cut off concentration values specified in the UN and EC classification guidelines. Five animals of each sex were initially exposed in a limit test for 4 hours to a target concentration of the test substance of 5 mg/L. Based on the mortality observed, five animals of each sex were exposed to the next lower target concentration of 1 mg/L.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 male and 5 females per dose group.
- Control animals:
- no
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- > 1 - < 5 mg/L air
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Mortality:
- At 5 mg/L, on the day following exposure (Day 2) three males and two females were found dead and the remaining animals were sacrificed for ethical reasons.
At 1 mg/L, one female was sacrificed for ethical reasons on Day 2. No further mortality occurred. - Clinical signs:
- other: At 5 mg/L, the animals showed gasping and laboured respiration during exposure. After exposure, hunched posture, lethargy, flat posture, laboured respiration, piloerection, ptosis and/or moribund status were shown by the animals. At 1 mg/L, no clinical si
- Body weight:
- At 5 mg/L, body weights loss was noted in the animals found dead or sacrificed on Day 2. At 1 mg/L, overall body weight gain and body weight loss in males and females was within the range expected for rats of this strain and age used in this type of study.
- Gross pathology:
- At 5 mg/L, macroscopic post mortem examination of the animals that were found dead or sacrificed for ethical reasons during the study revealed abnormalities of the lungs (many dark red foci), stomach (black foci in the glandular mucosa), liver (pale discoloration) and mandibular lymph nodes (dark red discoloration). At 1 mg/L, no abnormalities were found at macroscopic post mortem examination of the animals.
Incidental findings included advanced autolysis which is not toxicologically relevant and pelvic dilation of the kidneys which is occasionally seen among rats of this age and strain and therefore considered not related to treatment. - Interpretation of results:
- Toxicity Category IV
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The inhalatory LC50, 4h value of Phenyl-tolyl-ethane in Wistar rats was established to be within the range of 1 – 5 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
Phenyl-tolyl-ethane was administered as an aerosol by inhalation for 4 hours to two groups of five male and five female Wistar rats each group. Animals were subjected to daily observations and determination of body weights on Days 1, 2, 8 and 15. Macroscopic examination was performed on the day of death or after terminal sacrifice (Day 15).
At 5 mg/L, on the day following exposure (Day 2) three males and two females were found dead and the remaining animals were sacrificed for ethical reasons. At 1 mg/L, one female was sacrificed for ethical reasons on Day 2. No further mortality occurred. At 5 mg/L, the animals showed gasping and laboured respiration during exposure. After exposure, hunched posture, lethargy, flat posture, laboured respiration, piloerection, ptosis and/or moribund status were shown by the animals. At 1 mg/L, no clinical signs were noted during exposure. After exposure, the animals showed lethargy, hunched posture, piloerection and/or ptosis between Days 1 and 4. In addition, the female sacrificed on Day 2 showed uncoordinated movements, chromodacryorrhoea, hypothermia, shallow respiration and a lean appearance. At 5 mg/L, body weights loss was noted in the animals found dead or sacrificed on Day 2. At 1 mg/L, overall body weight gain and body weight loss in males and females was within the range expected for rats of this strain and age used in this type of study. At 5 mg/L, macroscopic post mortem examination of the animals that were found dead or sacrificed for ethical reasons during the study revealed abnormalities of the lungs (many dark red foci), stomach (black foci in the glandular mucosa), liver (pale discoloration) and mandibular lymph nodes (dark red discoloration). At 1 mg/L, no abnormalities were found at macroscopic post mortem examination of the animals. The inhalatory LC50, 4h value of Phenyl-tolyl-ethane in Wistar rats was established to be within the range of 1 – 5 mg/L.
Reference
The Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) and geometric standard deviation (gsd) were determined twice. For the 5 mg/L exposure group, the MMAD was 2.9 μm (gsd 1.9) and 2.6 μm (gsd 2.1). For the 1 mg/L exposure group, the MMAD was 2.8 μm (gsd 2.1) and 2.9 μm (gsd 1.9).
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Value:
- 1 600 mg/m³ air
- Quality of whole database:
- The key study is GLP-compliant and has Klimisch score 1.
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- No data
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: This study was conducted according to GLP and sufficient data is available for interpretation of results.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Sprague Dawley CFY
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Sprague Dawley CFY rats obtained from Interfauna (UK) Limited, Wyton, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, were used.
The animals were housed in groups of three in solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with softwood sawdust. The animal room temperature was maintained at 19 to 25°C with 40 to 70% relative humidity. Artificaial lighting provided 12 hours light and 12 hours darkness. The animals were acclimatised for at least three days before treatment and individually identified by ear punching and cage card. The animals had free access to food (Rat and Mouse Expanded Diet No. 1, Special Diet Services Limited, Witham, Essex, UK). Water was provided at all times from glass water bottles. - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on dermal exposure:
- Four groups, each of three male rats were given a single 24-hour, occluded dermal application to the shaved back at dose levels of 0.05, 1.0, 2.0 or 4.0 ml/kg or g/kg. Liquid testmaterial was used undiluted. The test site was covered with aluminium foil and secured by adhesive tape.
- Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 0.05, 1.0, 2.0 or 4.0 ml/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 3 male rats/dose
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- Four groups, each of three male rats were given a single 24-hour, occluded dermal application to the shaved back at dose levels of 0.05, 1.0, 2.0 or 4.0 ml/kg or g/kg. Liquid testmaterial was used undiluted. The test site was covered with aluminium foil and secured by adhesive tape.
Animals were observed for overt systemic toxicity and mortality one and four hours after dosing and then at least once daily for seven days. Individual bodyweights were recorded on the day of treatment. No necropsies were performed.
Using the mortality data an estimate of the acute dermal LD50 of the test material was made. - Statistics:
- None
- Preliminary study:
- No data
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 4 mL/kg bw
- Mortality:
- No mortality
- Clinical signs:
- other: Animals treated with 4.0 ml/kg showed signs of toxicity on the day of dosing including lethargy, decreased respiratory rate, vocalisation, increased lacrimation and red/brown staining around the eyes and snout. All animals in the 2.0 m l /kg dose group sh
- Gross pathology:
- No data
- Other findings:
- None
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: EU GHS
- Conclusions:
- The estimated acute dermal LD50 in the male rat following a single, 24 hour, occluded application to intact skin was greater than 4.0 ml/kg.
- Executive summary:
Untreated DPE 75 (75% diphenyl ethane), a potential thermal oil, was provided for toxicity, testing by the Olefin Derivatives Department, DCE. It was tested for oral and dermal toxicity in groups of 3 male rats. Administration of up to 4.0 ml/kg dermally resulted only in non-specific signs of treatment which were absent after 3 days.
Skin irritation studies were performed with 3 New Zealand White rabbits in each case. A 4 hour dermal application of 0.5 ml/kg resulted in erythema and oedema in all rabbits which lasted for more than 3 days but had recovered by 7 days.
Untreated DPE75 has very low toxicity by dermal routes.
Reference
None
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 4 000 mg/kg bw
Additional information
No data gaps were identified. The available data are adequate for risk assessment and classification and labelling purposes.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
Three studies are available for acute toxicity (2 GLP-compliant studies) of members of the diphenylmethane category.
For 1,1-DPE the acute LD50 was estimated according to OECD guideline 401. The determined LD50 of > 8000 mg/kg is used for the risk assessment of 1,1-DPE.
Overall, all measured acute oral toxicity data are very consistent. No further testing is required. For detailed category rationale and justification see section 13, category justification.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – inhalation endpoint
Two studies are available for members of the diphenylmethane category for acute toxicity via the inhalation route.
For Phenyl-tolyl-ethane the LC50 was estimated in a GLP-compliant study according to OECD 403. A LC50 of 1-5 mg/l was determined.
The acute toxicity of 1,1-DPE was assessed in a non GLP-compliant study according to OECD guideline 403. The determined LC50 was >1.6 mg/l.
Since the study results are in the same order of magnitude the study with Phenyl-tolyl-ethane (highest quality) is used for the risk assessment of 1,1-DPE.No further testing is required. For detailed category rationale and justification see section 13, category justification.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Three studies are available for members of the diphenylmethane category for acute dermal toxicity. All measured acute dermal toxicity data are very consistent (LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw.).
For 1,1-DPE a GLP-compliant study according to OECD 402 is available. The dermal LD50 was estimated to be > 4 ml/kg.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Acute oral toxicity:
The respective criteria are not met.
The estimated LD50 of > 8000 mg/kg bw. is well above the treshold for hazard category 4 (2000 mg/kg bw). 1,1 -DPE is therefore not classified for acute oral toxicity.
Acute toxicity via the the inhalation route:
The respective criteria are met. The estimated LC50 of 1 - 5 mg/l (read across from PTE) justifies the classification as acute toxic via the inhalation route, category 4.
Acute dermal toxicity:
The respective criteria are not met.
The estimated LD50 of > 4000 mg/kg bw. is well above the treshold for hazard category 4 (2000 mg/kg bw). 1,1 -DPE is therefore not classified for acute dermal toxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.