Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1973
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Well documented study pre-dating OECD protocolls and GLP requirements. However, slight shortcomings regards documentation (e.g. lighting conditions, test substance purity, analytical verification of administered dose) justify a Klimisch 2 rating (reliable with restrictions).

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1973
Report date:
1973

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
Version / remarks:
study pre-dates OECD protocol but follows the same scientific principles and methodology
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
study pre-dates GLP guideline
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-N'-(2-ethylphenyl)oxamide
EC Number:
245-950-9
EC Name:
N-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-N'-(2-ethylphenyl)oxamide
Cas Number:
23949-66-8
Molecular formula:
C18H20N2O3
IUPAC Name:
N-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-N'-(2-ethylphenyl)ethanediamide
Test material form:
solid: crystalline
Details on test material:
Tradeneame: Sanduvor VSU
Batch: 2205
Manufacturing date: 15.11.1972

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
160 SPF-rats of the Sprague-Dawley strain were randomly devided into 4 groups (as control and three test groups) of 20 males and 20 females each and uniquely numbered for further identification. Animals were kept individually in makrolon cages. The temperature in the animal room was kept at 25 ±0.5 °C and relative humidity was controlled to 50 ±5 %.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: feed
Vehicle:
other: NAFAG mouse and rat feed, No. 194
Details on oral exposure:
The test substance was mixed with NAFAG mouse and rat feed No 194 in portions of 5 kg, using a Turbula mixer (supplier: Bachofen in Basel, Switzerland). Control animals received pure NAFAG mouse and rat feed No 194 without addition of test substance.
Test and control animals received feed and water ad libitum. Feed consumption and body wight of animals were recorded once weekly. Water consumtion was monitored throughout the study but turned out to be obsolete during the course of the study as no differences between control and test animals were noted.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
no
Duration of treatment / exposure:
13 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
continuous; the test substance was supplied by feed ad libitum
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 1600, 4000 and 10000 ppm
Basis:
nominal in diet
No. of animals per sex per dose:
20 males and 20 females per dose group and control
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Positive control:
none

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
Clinical Chemistry:
Following 4, 8 and 13 weeks of exposure, blood samples were taken from 5 males and 5 females of each dose group from the sublingual vene and these samples investgiated for the following parameters:
- BUN (blood urea nitrogen) according to method of W. Marsch et al., Clin. Chem. 11, 624 (1965) using a Technicon AutoAnalyzer micro method [mg%]
- FBS (fasting blood sugar) according to method of W.S. Hoffmann, J. Biol. Chem. 120, 51 (1937) using a Technicon AutoAnalyzer micro method [mg%]
- SAP (serum alakaline phosphatase)according to method of W. Marsch et al., Clin. Chem. 5, 119 (1959) using a Technicon AutoAnalyzer micro method in [IU]
- SGPT (serum glutamic pyruvat transaminase) according to Boehringer test comination 15978 [IU]
Hämatological examinations:
Following 4, 8 and 13 weeks of exposure, the following examinations from 5 males and 5 females of each dose groupwere performed:
- hämatokrit (HCT) with a coulter counter [%RBC in full blood]
- erythrocytes (RBC) with a coulter counter [million cells/mm3]
- total leokocytes (WBC) with a coulter counter [thousand cells/mm3]
- hämoglobin (HGB) with the Merckotest (Merch Darmstadt) [as hämoglobin cyanide in g/100 ml blood]
- differenciate leukocytes (microscopic) [%WBC] as
* neutrophile leucocytes
* lymphocytes
* monocytes
* eosinophiles
* basophiles
- absolute indices: average erythrocyte volume (MCV) and average hämoglobin concentration per cell (MCHC)

Urinanalysis:
Following the 6th and 12th week of exposureurine of 5 males and 5 females per dose was collected and the following parameters were investigated:
- pH
- pecific weight (refractive, using a TS-meter)
- proteine (using albustix reagent tabs)
- glucose (using Clinistix reagens)
- ketones (according to Libbrecht)
- pigments (benzidin method)
- urinary sediment was checked for the following parameters:
* Erythrocytes (RBC)
* Leucocytes (WBC)
* Epithelial cells (EPC)
* Uric acid crystals (Uric AC)
*calcium oxalate crystals (CA-OXA)
* Triple phosphate (TRIPHO)
* Amorphe urates (AM URA)
Sacrifice and pathology:
At the end of exposure period (after 13 weeks) 5 males and 5 females of each dose group, which were not used before for other examinations, were sacrificed and the following organs have been investigated macroscopically (organ weight relative to body weight): Thyroids, adrenal glands, pituitary glands, brain, heart, lungs, thymus, spleen, liver, kidneys, uterus/prostate, seminal vesicle.
Following macroscopic examination the organs were examined histologically.
Statistics:
The Student t-test method was applied for assessing relevance of changes versus control.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
no effects observed
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
no effects observed
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Urinalysis findings:
no effects observed
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Details on results:
No clinical signs or mortality were observed. At all dose levels no differences in body weight gain compared to controls were observed. Very slight reduction in food consumption of females (not observed in males) did not affect body weight gain and was considered non-significant. As a result, food efficiency of males was normal and slightly increased for females. Water consumption was comparable in all dose groups to controls.
In the 4th week of exposure males showed a slightly increased medium cell volume (MCV) values and slight increase of red blood cells but still within normal ranges. To investigate whether these effects are substance specific, the experiment was repeated only with male rats (controls and 10000 ppm dose group only) but the effect could not be reproduced. Thus, the effect on males regarding red blood cells and MCV values were considered incidental. The clinical chemistry parameters (BUN, SAP and SGPT) revealed no differences between dose groups and controls. fasting blood sugar values (FBS) were slightly increased in all groups inclucing controls but still within normal range and thus this effect was not considered substance specific. Urinanalyses revealed no specific findings, as specific weight and pH were normal, Acetone and glucose were negativ and blood pigments were not found. In some urine samples (from dose groups and controls) proteines were found (non-dose-dependent), which is often found in rats and therefore not considered treatment specific. Significant deviations (p < 0.05) of absolute and relative organ weights of thyroid, brain, kidneys, adrenal glands and lungs were minor and could be explained by lower standard deviation in dose groups compared to controls. All these deviations were also within biological variability and non-dose specific and therefore were not considered treatment related. No other effects on organ weight were observed.
Finally, also gross pathology and histopatholology showed no treatment related findings.

Effect levels

open allclose all
Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Effect level:
10 000 ppm
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: In absence of any treatment specific effects the NOEL was set to the highest dose level tested.
Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Effect level:
ca. 600 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: In absence of any treatment specific effects the NOEL was set to the highest dose level tested.
Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Effect level:
521.47 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male
Basis for effect level:
other: In absence of any treatment specific effects the NOAEL was set to the highest dose level tested.
Remarks on result:
other: as average of all males, considering measured food consumption (19125 mg) and body weight over the exposure period
Dose descriptor:
NOEL
Effect level:
663.66 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
female
Basis for effect level:
other: In absence of any treatment specific effects the NOEL was set to the highest dose level tested.
Remarks on result:
other: as average of all females, considering measured food consumption (15500 mg) and body weight over the exposure period

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In this 90 day feeding study with N-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-N'-(2-ethylphenyl)oxamide no treatement related effects were seen in all dose groups (1600, 4000 and 10000 ppm) and thus the "No Observed Effect Level" (NOEL) was set at the highest dose group tested (10.000 ppm) which is equivalent to 521.47 mg/kg bw/d in males and 663.66 mg/kg bw/d in females (ca. 600 mg/kg bw/d males/females).
Executive summary:

The test substance N-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-N'-(2-ethylphenyl)oxamide was investigated in a 90-day (13 wk) feeding study in Sprague-Dawley rats. 20 Males and 20 females were used per dose group (0, 1600, 4000, 10000 ppm). Development of body weight was normal in all groups and only a very slight food consumption reduction in females was noted which had no effect on body weight development. Unspecific variations in haematological parameters during exposure of males did normalize at the end of the exposure period and therefore were considered incidental. This was supported by a repetition experiment with another group of males (dose groups 0 and 10000 ppm), in which these haematological variations could not be reproduced. Effects on clinical chemistry parameters were not seen and also urine-analysis did not reveal any findings of significance. Pathological microscopy also did not reveal any effects on organ tissue.

In conclusion, up to 10.000 ppm, which is equivalent to 521.47 mg/kg bw/d in males and 663.66 mg/kg bw/d in females (ca. 600 mg/kg bw/d males/females), no effects were seen and thus this was considered the No-Observed-Effect-Level (NOEL) in this study.