Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
14 days
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Following GLP/OECD gulidline with no deficiency.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2013

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.1 (Acute Toxicity (Oral))
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
acute toxic class method

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
potassium allophonate
IUPAC Name:
potassium allophonate
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Potassium carbamoylcarbamate
EC Number:
247-728-7
EC Name:
Potassium carbamoylcarbamate
Cas Number:
26479-35-6
Molecular formula:
C2H4N2O3.K
IUPAC Name:
potassium N-carbamoylcarbamate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report):Potassium Allophonate
- Physical state:powder
- Analytical purity:83.8%
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: HsdHan:WIST
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Species, strain and supplier: Female (nulliparous, non-pregnant) HsdHan™:WIST strain rats were obtained from Harlan UK Ltd, Bicester.

Acclimatisation period and allocation to study: Rats were arbitrarily selected from the delivery boxes and allocated to the appropriate number of
cages using a sequence that reduced selective bias. The condition of the animals was assessed daily throughout the acclimatisation period of 6 to 8 days.Overtly healthy animals were arbitrarily allocated to the study groups at least one day prior to dosing. At the start of the study the rats were 8 to 9 weeks of age and weighed 170 g to 192 g on Day -1. The weight variation did not exceed ±20% of the mean weight.

Caging:The animals were housed in groups of up to five during the acclimatisation period. From the day prior to dosing (Day –1), the rats were
housed in groups of three in similar cages.

Diet, water and bedding: SQC(E) Rat and Mouse Maintenance Diet No 1, from Special Diets Services Ltd, Witham, UK was freely available to the animals at all times, except for a period of fasting from the evening of the day prior to dosing (Day -1) until approximately 3 hours after dosing. Each batch
of diet had been analysed for specific constituents and contaminants by the manufacturer.
Mains water was provided, ad libitum, via cage-mounted water bottles. The water had been periodically analysed for specific contaminants.
Certificates of analysis for contaminant levels in each batch of diet or in the water supply were consigned to central files at this laboratory.
Environment: The animal rooms were designed to permit 15 to 20 air changes per hour. The temperature and humidity ranges were 20 to 24 degrees C and 45% to 65% humidity, respectively. Daily recordings of maximum and minimum temperature and humidity were made. The rooms were
illuminated by fluorescent strip-lights for twelve hours daily.


Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on oral exposure:
Treatment of animals was sequential. Sufficient time was allowed between each group to confirm the survival of the previously dosed animals.
Dose levels were expressed gravimetrically and in terms of test article received (without regard to purity or active content).
Individual doses (mL) were calculated using the fasted body weights of the rats on the morning of dosing (Day 1) and the dose volume of 10 mL/kg.
The test article was dispersed in purified water. The formulated concentration was calculated from the selected dose level and the dose volume of 10 mL/kg. All formulations were used within two hours of preparation.
The formulations were maintained on a magnetic stirrer to ensure homogeneity.
Doses:
2000 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
6
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing:
All animals were examined at the beginning and end of the working day throughout the acclimatisation and study periods to ensure they were in
good health.
Rats were weighed on Day 1 (day before dosing) and on Days 1, 4, 8 and 15.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Clinical signs:Clinical signs were recorded immediately post dose, at approximately 15 and 30 minutes post dose, hourly between 1 and 4 hours
post dose (inclusive), twice daily on Days 2, 3 and 4 and once daily from the fifth to last day of the observation period. Individual records of clinical
signs were maintained for each treated rat.
- Other examinations performed: none.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
Mortality Ratio 0/6
Clinical signs:
other: No clinical signs seen throughout the observation period.
Gross pathology:
No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
The acute median lethal oral dose level of the test article, Potassium Allophonate, was found to exceed 2000 mg/kg.
The test material was considered to have no significant acute toxic risk in respect of its acute oral toxicity and did not meet the criteria for
classification according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).