Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 220-836-1 | CAS number: 2915-57-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- not reported
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: A well reported non-GLP study conducted to sound scientific principles with the read across substance, bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Responses of the L8178Y tk+/tk- Mouse Lymphoma Cells Forward Mutation Assay: III. 72 Coded Chemicals
- Author:
- McGregor D B, Brown A, Cattanach P, Edwards I, McBride D, Riach C, Casary W J
- Year:
- 1 988
- Bibliographic source:
- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 12:85-154
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (study lacked a longer exposure time)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate
- EC Number:
- 203-090-1
- EC Name:
- Bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate
- Cas Number:
- 103-23-1
- Molecular formula:
- C22H42O4
- IUPAC Name:
- bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate
- Test material form:
- not specified
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: The tissue culture medium was maintained in Fischer’s medium. Fischer’s medium was supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 110 µg/mL sodium pyruvate, 0.05 % pluronic F68 antibiotics, and 10 % heat-inactivated donor horse serum (v/v).
- Properly maintained: Yes. L5178Y TK+/- cells were stored in a liquid nitrogen freezer. Following removal from liquid nitrogen, the cultures were kept at 37 °C on gyratory tables
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 312.5, 625, 1250, 2500, 5000 µg/mL - Trial 1 (without metabolic activation)
0, 1800, 2600, 3400, 4200, 5000 µg/mL - Trial 2 (without metabolic activation)
0, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5000 µg/mL - Trials 1 and 2 (with metabiolic activation) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 3-methylcholanthrene
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHODOLOGY
Each exposed culture consisted of 6 x 10^6 cells in a final volume of 10 mL Fischer's medium in a 30 mL plastic tube. The tube was incubated for 4 hours on a horizontal axis roller drum rotating at 10 rpm. At the end of the incubation time, the cells were sedimented by centrifugation at 500 g.av. for 10 minutes, washed and resuspended in 20 mL Fischer's medium. the cell suspensions (3 x 10^5 cells/mL) were incubated for a 2 day expression period, the cell population density being adjusted back to 20 mL of 3 x 10^5 cells/mL after 24 hours. After 48 hours, the cell population densities were estimated and culture volumes containing 3 x 10^6 cells adjusted to 15 mL with Fischer's medium, giving a cell population density of 2 x 10^5 cells/mL.
CLONING EFICIENCY
A 0.1 mL sample of the cell suspension was withdrawn and diluted 1:100. Three 0.1 mL samples (200 cells) of the diluted cultures were transferred to 30 mL tubes, mixed with 25 mL Fischer's medium containing 20 % heat-inactivated horse serum containing 0.35 % Noble agar and poured into 90 mm Petri plates.
MUTANT SELECTION
Three aliquots (each containing 10^6 cells) of the remaining culture were distributed to 30 mL tubes, mixed with 20 mL cloning medium to give final concentrations of 0.35 % Noble agar and 3µg trifluorothymidine/mL, then poured into 90 mm Petri plates.
INCUBATION
The agar was gelled at 4 °C for 5 - 10 minutes, then the plates were incubated for 11 - 14 days in 5 % CO2: 95 % air at 37 °C.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS
Vehicle controls were performed in quadruplicate, positive controls in duplicate and test concentrations in duplicate
COLONY COUNTING
Colonies were counted using at Artek 880 Automates Colony Counter.
CALCULATIONS
Toxicity was expressed as either a reduction of cell population growth in suspension during the expression period or a reduction in cloning efficiency. A measure of the overall toxicity was the relative total growth (RTG) which was determined as follows:
RTG = (total suspension growth x cloning efficiency) in dosed culture / (total suspension growth x cloning efficiency) in control culture
Mutant fraction (MF) was calculated as follows:
MF = 200 x (mutant clones per plate / total clones per plate)
= mutants / 10^6 clonable cells - Evaluation criteria:
- CRITERIA FOR A POSITIVE RESPONSE
A positive response is obtained when there is a statistically significant dose-related increase at one of the three highest acceptable doses.
CRITERIA FOR A NEGATIVE RESPONSE
A negative response is obtained when there is no reproducible statistically significant dose-related increase in mutant frequency. - Statistics:
- The statistical analysis consisted of a dose-trend test and a variance analysis of pair-wise comparisons of each dose against the vehicle control. The significance level was set at 5 %.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Precipitation of the test material was observed at 1000 µg/mL, but testing was continued up to 5000 µg/mL. In the absence of S9 mix there was no indication of a mutagenic response in two experiments. In the presence of S9 mix, one experiment similarly failed to show any mutagenic effect, while significant increases in mutant fraction occurred in a second experiment. The Lowest Observed Effect Dose in this experiment was 2000 µg/mL, higher than the precipitation concentration. Significant toxicity was observed in all experiments.
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Results (without metabolic activation)
Without S9 Trial 1 |
Without S9 Trial 2 |
||||||||||
Conc (µg/mL) |
CE |
RTG |
MC |
MF |
Mean MF |
Conc (µg/mL) |
CE |
RTG |
MC |
MF |
Mean MF |
0 |
78 |
96 |
60 |
26 |
24 |
0 |
92 |
100 |
75 |
27 |
22 |
84 |
85 |
49 |
19 |
63 |
97 |
31 |
16 |
||||
91 |
105 |
65 |
24 |
103 |
104 |
61 |
20 |
||||
85 |
114 |
67 |
26 |
84 |
98 |
63 |
25 |
||||
312.5 |
75 |
74 |
64 |
28 |
26 |
1800 |
88 |
26 |
41 |
16 |
18 |
80 |
80 |
57 |
24 |
74 |
25 |
47 |
21 |
||||
625 |
88 |
75 |
35 |
13 |
20 |
2600 |
73 |
24 |
51 |
23 |
18 |
80 |
70 |
64 |
27 |
88 |
23 |
36 |
14 |
||||
1250 |
69 |
25 |
58 |
28 |
23 |
3400 |
97 |
20 |
48 |
17 |
16 |
75 |
38 |
39 |
17 |
93 |
15 |
44 |
16 |
||||
2500 |
79 |
13 |
50 |
21 |
27 |
4200 |
78 |
15 |
35 |
15 |
20 |
70 |
16 |
68 |
32 |
69 |
13 |
50 |
24 |
||||
5000 |
87r |
13 |
48 |
18 |
5000 |
74 |
12 |
37 |
17 |
17 |
|
LETHAL |
72 |
13 |
36 |
17 |
|||||||
15 (MMS) |
32 |
25 |
112 |
119 |
118* |
15 (MMS) |
44 |
29 |
110 |
83 |
83* |
44 |
24 |
156 |
118 |
39 |
34 |
97 |
84 |
Table 2: Results (with metabolic activation)
With S9 Trial 1 |
With S9 Trial 2 |
||||||||||
Conc (µg/mL) |
CE |
RTG |
MC |
MF |
Mean MF |
Conc (µg/mL) |
CE |
RTG |
MC |
MF |
Mean MF |
0 |
80 |
98 |
72 |
30 |
33 |
0 |
102 |
116 |
82 |
27 |
37 |
76 |
109 |
55 |
24 |
109 |
101 |
114 |
35 |
||||
70 |
98 |
88 |
42 |
100 |
101 |
111 |
37 |
||||
73 |
94 |
78 |
36 |
68 |
82 |
102 |
50 |
||||
1000 |
65 |
39 |
47 |
24 |
32 |
1000 |
93 |
70 |
116 |
42 |
40 |
75 |
38 |
90 |
40 |
100 |
67 |
115 |
38 |
||||
2000 |
50 |
27 |
53 |
36 |
33 |
2000 |
111 |
28 |
294 |
88 |
73* |
48 |
22 |
43 |
30 |
101 |
32 |
176 |
58 |
||||
3000 |
59 |
18 |
55 |
31 |
34 |
3000 |
93 |
23 |
226 |
81 |
85* |
59 |
19 |
65 |
37 |
91 |
21 |
242 |
89 |
||||
4000 |
56 |
16 |
61 |
37 |
39 |
4000 |
78 |
20 |
187 |
80 |
80* |
53 |
22 |
66 |
41 |
100 |
26 |
238 |
79 |
||||
5000 |
40 |
16 |
37 |
31 |
34 |
5000 |
94 |
28 |
240 |
85 |
81* |
48 |
13 |
53 |
37 |
77 |
27 |
177 |
77 |
||||
2.5 (MCA) |
29 |
16 |
187 |
214 |
222* |
2.5 (MCA) |
55 |
11 |
603 |
364 |
363* |
32 |
21 |
223 |
231 |
55 |
11 |
592 |
361 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under the conditions of the experiment it was concluded that the test material was not mutagenic in this system. - Executive summary:
The potential of the test material to cause gene mutation or clastogenic effects in mammalian cells was determined in a study which was conducted to a methodology which was similar to that outlines in the standardised guideline OECD 476. L51788Y TK+/-mouse lymphoma cells were treated in vitro both in the presence and absence of a rat liver derived auxillary metabolic system (S9 mix) in two independent experiments. Mutant colonies were scored for all cultures in each experiment. The test material was tested up to a maximum concentration of 5000 µg/mL in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. This concentration is approximately equivalent to the limit concentration for this assay.
Under the conditions of the study precipitation of the test material was observed at 1000 µg/mL, but testing was continued up to 5000 µg/mL. In the absence of S9 mix there was no indication of a mutagenic response in two experiments. In the presence of S9 mix, one experiment similarly failed to show any mutagenic effect, while significant increases in mutant fraction occurred in a second experiment. The Lowest Observed Effect Dose in this experiment was 2000 µg/mL, higher than the precipitation concentration. Significant toxicity was observed in all experiments. It was therefore concluded that the test material was not mutagenic in this system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.