Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
04 - 20 Feb 2020
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2020
Report date:
2020

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Version / remarks:
Adopted in 2001
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Slovak National Accreditation Service, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
disodium 4-[(1-hydroxyprop-2-en-1-yl)amino]-4'-(prop-2-enamido)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2,2'-disulfonate
EC Number:
812-549-0
Cas Number:
881539-89-5
Molecular formula:
C18H14N2Na2O8S2
IUPAC Name:
disodium 4-[(1-hydroxyprop-2-en-1-yl)amino]-4'-(prop-2-enamido)-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2,2'-disulfonate

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: VELAZ PRAHA, Czech Republic
- Females nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 184 - 211 g (range)
- Fasting period before study: Animals were fasted 10 - 12 hours prior to dosing (food but not water was withheld over night). Following the period of fasting, animals were weighed, and the test item administered. After test item administration, food was withheld for a further 3 - 4 h.
- Housing: Three animals per cage were housed in plastic cages suspended on stainless steel racks. Bedding used: SAFE 3/4 S, JRS J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + Co KG.
- Diet: The laboratory food ssniff (ssniff Spezialdiäten GmbH, Germany) was available ad libitum.
- Water: The animals received tap water for human consumption ad libitum. The quality of drinking water is periodically analyzed and recorded.
- Acclimation period: The animals were acclimated under the conditions identical to the conditions during the experiment 5 days prior to the start of treatment.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 50 - 60
- Air changes: Animal room was equipped with central air conditioning.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 /12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 04 Feb 2020 To: 20 Feb 2020

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Remarks:
water for injection
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Amount of vehicle (gavage): 5 mL/kg bw
- Justification for choice of vehicle: An aqueous solution/suspension/emulsion is a common vehicle in toxicity studies like OECD TG 423.
- Lot/batch no.: 18H0902 (Bieffe Medital S. p. A, Italy)

MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED
Administration volume was 5 mL/kg bw.

DOSAGE PREPARATION
The required amount of the test item was mixed with vehicle shortly before administration.

CLASS METHOD
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: A limit dose of 2000 mg/kg bw was used as a starting dose because available information indicated that the test item was likely to be non-toxic regarding acute toxicity.
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
6 females
Control animals:
no
Remarks:
not required
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Animals were observed for clinical signs individually immediately after administration of the test item and 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 h later, and daily thereafter for the next 14 days. Individual body weights of animals were measured immediately prior to administration of the test item and weekly thereafter.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: Yes.
- Examinations performed: All test animals were subjected to gross necropsy.
Statistics:
Not applicable.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No mortality occurred during the study period (see Table 1 under "Any other information on results incl. tables").
Clinical signs:
other: No clinical signs of toxicity were observed up to the end of the 14-day observation period.
Gross pathology:
Necropsy and histopathological examination revealed no substance-related findings.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1. Acute oral toxicity 

Dose

[mg/kg bw]

Mortality

Clinical signs

 

N*

N*

Females

2000

0/6

0/6

*N= Number of animals/ number of animals used

Table 2: Body weight

 Sex  Dose  Animal ID  Body weight (g)  Body weight (g) Body weight (g) Body weight difference (g) Body weight difference (g) Body weight difference (g)
     Initial  Week 1  Week 2  Week 1 - Initial  Week 2 - Initial  Week 2 - Week 1
 female  2000 mg/kg bw  1  211  223  242  12  31  19
 female  2000 mg/kg bw  2  198  218  234  20  36  16
 female  2000 mg/kg bw  3  195  204  235  9  40  31
 female  2000 mg/kg bw  4  185  217  228  32  43  11
 female  2000 mg/kg bw  5  189  236  256  47  67  20
 female  2000 mg/kg bw  6  184  209  225  25  41  16

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Conclusions:
The test substance AF-959 administered once to 6 female Wistar rats at a limit dose of 2000 mg/kg bw did not cause death, signs of toxicity, body weight losses, or macroscopic pathological changes.