Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Single dose; 14 day observation
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Justification for type of information:
Performed to guidelines, 2018
Material tested included butanol, monoethylene glycol and water at ca 50% actives. The solvents and water were not possible to remove under conditions that would not otherwise cause stability problems. The solvents and water are not stabilisers, but the temperatures needed to remove cause instability.
Freeze drying is not possible in view of the solvents, water and amines in the substance forming azoetropes.
In view of the mortality seen in three out of four animals at the top dose, a reduced dose of 300 mg/kg of the material supplied was tested. It is accepted that for REACH, a dose of 600 mg/kg (300 mg/kg actives) should have been tested, but as the data is also needed for US regulatory purposes and for classification of the material as supplied, the dose levels were aimed at the material as supplied.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 420 (Acute Oral Toxicity - Fixed Dose Method)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
fixed dose procedure
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Phenol, 4,4'-(1-methylethylidene)bis-, oligomer with (chloromethyl)oxirane and ethylenediamine, reaction products with carbon disulphide, potassium salts
EC Number:
600-775-0
Cas Number:
1067676-04-3
IUPAC Name:
Phenol, 4,4'-(1-methylethylidene)bis-, oligomer with (chloromethyl)oxirane and ethylenediamine, reaction products with carbon disulphide, potassium salts
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
Technical grade, CA 50% in water
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Batch: Lot#102-17 filtered
Purity: Not a neat substance the average activity is 48.66%
Physical state / Appearance orange liquid
Expiry Date: 01 May 2019
Storage Conditions: room temperature in the dark

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
At the start of the study the animals were 8 to 12 weeks of age. The body weight variation did not exceed ±20% of the mean body weight of any previously treated animals

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on oral exposure:
For the 300 mg/kg dose level the test item was freshly prepared as required, as a solution in distilled water.
For the 2000 mg/kg dose level the test item was used as supplied. The specific gravity was determined and used to calculate the appropriate dose volume for the required dose level.
Doses:
Initial sightighting 300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg on material as supplied (ca 150 and 1000 mg/kg actives)
Main dose 2000 mg/kg (1000 mg/kg acitves), but mortality noted in this group, even though animal used in sighting study survived.
Further treatment of 300 mg/kg (ca 150 mg/kg actives) to confirm no adverse effect level
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Four females in main groups.
Control animals:
no

Results and discussion

Preliminary study:
The single females treated with 300 and 2000 mg/kg survived (150 and 1000 mg/kg actives) and at 2000 mg/kg, minimal clincial signs seen (hunched posture for 2 hours post dosing)
Effect levelsopen allclose all
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
approximate LD50
Effect level:
ca. 1 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
act. ingr.
Remarks on result:
other: Estimated
Remarks:
Two out of 5 animals survived dose of 2000 mg/kg material supplied (ca 1000 mg/kg actives)
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
other: NOAEL
Effect level:
ca. 150 mg/kg bw
Based on:
act. ingr.
Remarks on result:
other: Five out of five animals showed no adverse effects (other than short term hunched posture) at 150 mg/kg actives (300 mg/kg as supplied)
Mortality:
Three animals treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg were found dead on Day 0. There were no deaths noted at a dose level of 300 mg/kg.
Deaths were within 2 hours of treatment.
Clinical signs:
other: Signs of systemic toxicity noted in the animals that were found dead during the study were hunched posture, ataxia, lethargy, loss of righting reflex, decreased respiratory rate and labored respiration. Signs of systemic toxicity noted in the surviving an
Gross pathology:
Abnormally red lungs, dark liver, dark kidneys and reddened gastric mucosa were noted at necropsy of animals treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg that died during the study. There were no abnormalities noted at necropsy of the surviving animals treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg. There were no abnormalities noted at necropsy of animals treated at a dose level of 300 mg/kg.
Other findings:
No other significant findings

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 4 based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The acute oral median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the female Wistar strain rat was estimated to be in the range of 300 - 2000 mg/kg (150 - 1000 mg/kg expressed as actives).

Material tested included butanol, monoethylene glycol and water at ca 50% actives. The solvents and water were not possible to remove under conditions that would not otherwise cause stability problems. The solvents and water are not stabilisers, but the temperatures needed to remove cause instability.
Freeze drying is not possible in view of the solvents, water and amines in the substance forming azoetropes.

In view of the mortality seen in three out of four animals at the top dose, a reduced dose of 300 mg/kg of the material supplied was tested. It is accepted that for REACH, a dose of 600 mg/kg (300 mg/kg actives) should have been tested, but as the data is also needed for US regulatory purposes and for classification of the material as supplied, the dose levels were aimed at the material as supplied.

The survival of 2 of the 5 animals that received the top dose of 1000 mg/kg actives (2000 mg/kg as supplied) and the absence of any effect at 150 mg/kg actives (300 mg/kg as supplied) would suggest GHS Acute Tox 4. Testing another group at 300 mg/kg actives is not justifed.