Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Particle size distribution (Granulometry)

Administrative data

Endpoint:
particle size distribution (granulometry)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
In a first step, the dispersion agent (ethanol) was added into the system and brought to constant circulation. Then, an underground determination and system calibration was carried out by measuring the particles contained in the dispersion agent. The resulting particle contamination was 0.00 %. Afterwards, some powder of Gd2(SO3)3 • 3 H2O was added into the ethanol at time t0 until an optimum intensity of the scattered light was achieved (Copt = 10.03 %). The first measurment was started at t1 = 4 min 8 s after t0. Recording of particle size data for the first measurement was carried out for 10 s. The measurements were then repeated in the same way at t2 = 19 min 42 s and t3 = 29 min 26 s after t0 without exchanging the suspension in between.
The calculation model used for determination of the particle size distribution assumes each particle to have spherical shape. Thus, the distribution curves calculated by the software of the system display the particle distribution vs. an averaging particle diameter. It is also important to point out that the distribution is volume based and does not refer to the number of particles.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
Laser scattering/diffraction
Type of particle tested:
aggregate
Type of distribution:
volumetric distribution

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Gadoliniumsulfite trihydrate
EC Number:
456-900-2
EC Name:
Gadoliniumsulfite trihydrate
Cas Number:
51285-81-5
Molecular formula:
Gd2(SO3)3*3H2O
IUPAC Name:
digadolinium(3+) trihydrate trisulfite
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
white dry powder
sample name: 2-02-M

Results and discussion

Mass median aerodynamic diameter:
93.6 µm
Particle sizeopen allclose all
Key result
Percentile:
D99
Mean:
178.47 µm
St. dev.:
1.2
Key result
Percentile:
D90
Mean:
138.32 µm
St. dev.:
1.45
Key result
Percentile:
D50
Mean:
93.57 µm
St. dev.:
0.83
Key result
Percentile:
D10
Mean:
52.4 µm
St. dev.:
0.48

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Executive summary:

The measurement was carried out with the laser diffraction spectroscopy device Sympatec Helos KR equipped with three lenses R1, R3, and R5 for particle sizes in the range of 0.1 to 875 µm. The device fully agrees with ISO 13320 (“Particle size analysis - laser diffraction methods”). Data interpretation was carried out with the software WINDOX 5.7.1.0 provided by the equipment manufacturer Sympatec. In a first step, the dispersion agent (ethanol) was added into the system and brought to constant circulation. Then, an underground determination and system calibration was carried out by measuring the particles contained in the dispersion agent. The resulting particle contamination was 0.00 %. Afterwards, some powder of Gd2(SO3)3 • 3 H2O was added into the ethanol at time t0 until an optimum intensity of the scattered light was achieved (Copt = 10.03 %). The first measurment was started at t1 = 4 min 8 s after t0. Recording of particle size data for the first measurement was carried out for 10 s. The measurements were then repeated in the same way at t2 = 19 min 42 s and t3 = 29 min 26 s after t0 without exchanging the suspension in between. The calculation model used for determination of the particle size distribution assumes each particle to have spherical shape. Thus, the distribution curves calculated by the software of the system display the particle distribution vs. an averaging particle diameter. It is also important to point out that the distribution is volume based and does not refer to the number of particles. All measurements were carried out at room temperature (25°C). A density of 4.1 g / cm3 and an aspect ratio of 1.0 was used for particle size calculations.

Results:

•       The powder of gadolinium sulphite trihydrate (Gd2(SO3)3 • 3 H2O) investigated by laser diffraction spectroscopy shows a monomodal particle size distribution.

•       The spherical aggregates have sizes between 10-250 µm with 99 vol. % of the particles having sizes < 180 µm.

•       The MMAD was calculated to 93.6(7) µm.

•       The aggregates consist of platelike crystallites (< 10 µm).

•       No significant volume of particles < 10 µm was detected.

•       The powder particles have a low probability of fragmentation.

•       The findings of the laser diffraction spectroscopy investigation are supported by SEM images of the same substance.