Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The registration substance was investigated for skin and/or eye irritation potential in GLP conform assays according to OECD test guidelines 404 and 405. Based on the results of these studies, the test material is not a skin irritant. With regard to eye irritation, the registration substance showed slight to moderate fully reversible eye irritating effects.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1987
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study according to GLP
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hoechst AG
- Age at study initiation: 3 - 5 month
- Weight at study initiation: 2.0 - 3.8 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: approximately 1 week

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3°C
- Humidity (%): 50 +/- 20%
- Air changes (per hr): 12 - 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 500 mg/patch
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted

Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hour exposure
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
- % coverage: 100
- Type of wrap if used: semi-occlusive bandage

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Remarks:
overall
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.1
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Remarks:
overall
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Based on the study results, sodium cocoyl taurate is not irritating to rabbit skin.
Executive summary:

The primary skin irritation potential of sodium cocoyl taurate was evaluated according to OECD test guideline 404 using three New Zealand albino rabbits. Only animals with intact skin were used. Each animal was treated with 0.5 mL of undiluted test material.The test item was applied over the whole surface of a 2.5 x 2.5 cm cellulose patch on a piece of surgical plaster. The plaster was fixed to the prepared skin area and then covered with a semi-occlusive bandage. The exposure period was 4 hours. After the exposure all remnants of the test material were carefully removed from the skin with warm tap water. Examinations of the skin took place after 30-60 minutes as well as 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the patches. Erythema and oedema were evaluated numerically according to the score of DRAIZE. Slight to well defined erythemas were observed in all animals shortly after removal of the plaster at the 30 - 60 minute reading. Only one animal showed a slight erythema 24 hours after exposure. Form the 48 h reading in this animals and from the 24 hour reading in the remaining 2 animals until the end of the study no signs of irritation were observed in any of the animals. The overall mean scores after 24, 48 and 72 hours were 0.1 for erythema and 0.0 for edema. Based on the study results, no skin irritating potential is attributable to sodium cocoyl taurate in rabbits under the described test conditions.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1987
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study according to GLP
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hoechst AG
- Age at study initiation: 3 - 5 month
- Weight at study initiation: 2.4 - 3.6 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: approximately 1 week

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3°C
- Humidity (%): 50 +/- 20 %
- Air changes (per hr): 12 - 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 100 mg/ eye
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted

Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hours

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp, fluorescein
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Remarks:
overall
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.67
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: no irritation observed
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.67
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Remarks:
overall
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
al animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.78
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.67
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.67
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 hours
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
overall
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.7
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.7
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.7
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Remarks:
overall
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
all animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.67
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Interpretation of results:
irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Based on the study results, sodium cocoyl taurate is irritating to rabbit eye.
Executive summary:

The primary eye irritation potential of sodium cocyl taurate was evaluated according to OECD Guideline 405 in the New Zealand albino rabbit. Only animals without ocular abnormalities were used for the study. 100 mg of undiluted test material was applied once to the conjunctival sac of the left eye of three rabbits. The untreated eyes served in each case as a control. The exposure period was 24 hours. 24 hours after instillation and at all the designated examination times at which a corneal examination with fluorescein sodium solution took place, the treated eyes were washed out thoroughly with isotonic saline at approx. 37°C. The eyes were examined 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after application of the test substance. At 24 and 72 hours the eyes were also examined for corneal lesions under UV light after instillation of one drop of 0.01% fluorescein-sodium solution. From 1 hour up to 3 days after administration the conjunctivae of the animals showed swellings above normal up to swellings with lids about half closed and definitely injected blood vessels up to a diffuse beefy red colour. The iris was reddened in two animals up to day 2 and in the remaining animal until day 3 p.a. The cornea of two animals showed scattered areas of opacity up to easily discernible translucent areas. All signs of irritation were reversible within 7 days post exposure. Based on the results of this study, sodium cocoyl taurate is considered to be irritating to rabbit eyes.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

GLP conform guideline studies are available for the evaluation of the endpoints skin irritation / corrosion and eye irritation with the pure registered substance. With regard toskin irritation/corrosion,three New Zealand albino rabbits were exposed to 0.5 mL of undiluted test material for 4 hours under semi-occlusive test conditions in accordance with OECD guideline 404. Skin reactions were assessed 30 -60 minutes, 24, 48 and 72 hours as well as 7 days after removal of the patches. As a result, slight erythema were observed in two animals up to 24 hours after removal of the plaster. From the 48 h reading until the end of the study no signs of irritation were observed in any of the animals. The overall mean scores over all animals after 24, 48 and 72 hours were 0.2 for erythema and 0.0 for edema. Based on the study results, no relevant skin irritating potential is attributable to the registration substance in rabbits under the described test conditions.

The primary eye irritation potential of the registration substance was evaluated in the New Zealand albino rabbit according to OECD test guideline 405. Only animals without ocular abnormalities were used for the study. 100 mg of undiluted test material was applied once to the conjunctival sac of the left eye of three rabbits. The untreated eyes served in each case as a control. The exposure period was 24 hours. 24 hours after instillation and at all the designated examination times at which a corneal examination with fluorescein sodium solution took place, the treated eyes were washed out thoroughly with isotonic saline at approx. 37°C. The eyes were examined 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after application of the test item. At 24 and 72 hours the eyes were also examined for corneal lesions under UV light after instillation of one drop of 0.01% fluorescein-sodium solution. From 1 hour up to 3 days after administration the conjunctivae of the animals showed swellings above normal up to swellings with lids about half closed and definitely injected blood vessels up to a diffuse beefy red colour. The iris was reddened in two animals up to day 2 and in the remaining animal until day 3 p.a. The cornea of two animals showed scattered areas of opacity up to easily discernible translucent areas. All signs of irritation were reversible within 7 days post exposure. Based on the results of this study, sodium cocoyl taurate is considered to be irritating to rabbit eyes.


Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Guideline study according to GLP. No derivations and/or confounders. Klimisch rating 1 representing reliability without restrictions. Information is valid and meet data requirements.

Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Guideline study according to GLP. No derivations and/or confounders. Klimisch rating 1 representing reliability without restrictions. Information is valid and meet data requirements.

Effects on eye irritation: irritating

Justification for classification or non-classification

In a guideline and GLP compliant primary skin irritation/corrosion study according to OECD TG 404, the registered substance produced only slight to moderate skin responses. Based on the individual mean scores for erythema and oedema no classification of the registered substance with regard to skin irritation/corrosion is warranted, either according to the EU Dangerous Substances Directive 67/548 (DSD) or according to the criteria of the EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation 1272/2008/EC (CLP).

With regard to primary eye irritation, a guideline and GLP conform study according to OECD TG 405 revealed slight to moderate eye irritation reactions for each of the three animals. All effects were fully reversible within 7 days. No corrosion was observed at any of the measuring intervals. No staining of the treated eyes by the test item was observed and no clinical signs were observed. Based on the findings and in accordance with the classification criteria of Directive 67/548 EEC (DSD), the registration substance is considered to be " irritating" to the rabbit eye. Based on the criteria of Directive (EC) 1272/2008 (GHS-CLP) the registration substance should be considered to be "irritating to eyes" (category 2).