Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 425-020-0 | CAS number: 191680-81-6 CGL 116
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1997-02-03 - 1997-04-15
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline Study in compliance with GLP
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 997
- Report date:
- 1997
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 81-6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 798.4100 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- A valid Guinea Pig Maximization Test (GPMT) is available with the test item and therefore no LLNA is required.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Reaction products of N,N'-ethane-1,2-diylbis(1,3-propanediamine), cyclohexane, peroxidized 4-butylamino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine and 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine
- EC Number:
- 425-020-0
- EC Name:
- Reaction products of N,N'-ethane-1,2-diylbis(1,3-propanediamine), cyclohexane, peroxidized 4-butylamino-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine and 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine
- Cas Number:
- 191680-81-6
- Molecular formula:
- C50H77N11O2-C168H230N32O8
- IUPAC Name:
- N2-(2-{[4,6-bis({butyl[1-(cyclohexyloxy)-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl]amino})-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl](3-{[4,6-bis({butyl[1-(cyclohexyloxy)-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl]amino})-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino}propyl)amino}ethyl)-N2-(3-{[4,6-bis({butyl[1-(cyclohexyloxy)-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl]amino})-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino}propyl)-N4,N6-dibutyl-N4,N6-bis[1-(cyclohexyloxy)-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl]-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine
- Details on test material:
- - Physical properties: A pale yellow powder
- Storage Conditions: room temperature
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc, Indianapolis, IN 46229
- Age at study initiation: Young adult
- Weight at study initiation: 302 - 481 grams at the start of the study
- Housing: housing and animal care conformed to standards (National Research Council, 1996)
- Teklad Guinea Pig Diet: ad libitum
- Tap water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least five days
- Experimental Start Date: February 4, 1997
- Experimental Termination Date: March 11, 1997
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 10 - 26 °C
- Humidity: 30 - 70 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- other: diethyl phthalate
- Concentration / amount:
- Intradermal induction exposure: 0.5% (w/v) concentration of test item in diethyl phthalate
Epicutaneous induction exposure: 25% (w/v) concentration of test item in diethyl phthalate
Epicutaneous challenge exposure: 5% (w/v) concentration of test item in diethyl phthalate
(Test group exposures were based on pretest results)
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: diethyl phthalate
- Concentration / amount:
- Intradermal induction exposure: 0.5% (w/v) concentration of test item in diethyl phthalate
Epicutaneous induction exposure: 25% (w/v) concentration of test item in diethyl phthalate
Epicutaneous challenge exposure: 5% (w/v) concentration of test item in diethyl phthalate
(Test group exposures were based on pretest results)
- No. of animals per dose:
- In total 50 animals were used:
Pretest:
- 8 topical pilot animals (4 males, 4 females)
- 2 intradermal injection pilot animals (1 male, 1 female)
Main test:
- 20 test animals (10 males, 10 females) [test group]
- 10 vehicle control animals (5 males, 5 females) [vehicle control group]
- 10 naive control animals (5 males, 5 females) [naive control group] - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- The irritation phase had the purpose of evaluating the irritation potential of test material at the levels to be used in the injection induction, topical induction, and challenge phase. The primary irritancy of the test material, when both injected and topically applied, was evaluated.
The procedure employed for these investigations was as follows:
Intradermal injections:
Intradermal injections (0.1 mL/site) were made into the clipped flank of two guinea-pigs at concentrations of 10%, 5%, 2.5%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.25%, 0.1%, and 0.05% (w/v) of the test item in diethyl phthalate. The resulting dermal reactions were assessed examined three days following injection.
- Epidermal applications:
Patches were endowed with a 0.4 mL quantity of 25%, 10%, 5%, 2.5%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.25%, and 0.1% (w/v) test item solution in diethyl phthalate and applied to the clipped and shaved flanks of each of eight guinea-pigs. Each animal was treated with four different concentrations; the position of the different concentrations on the animals was varied to adjust for possible site-to-site variation in response. Patches were secured by an elastic adhesive bandage wound around each of the animal's torso until overlapping.
The dressings were removed after an exposure period of 24 hours and the reaction sites were assessed for erythema and edema on a numerical basis.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures:
2 exposures, i.e. a single intradermal exposure in week 1 (6 injections/animal) and an epicutaneous exposure in week 2 (closed patch)
- Exposure period: single application (intradermal exposure), 48 hours (epicutaneous exposure)
- Control groups: 2 groups of 10 animals
- Frequency of applications: 1 intradermal application (week 1) and 1 epicutaneous application (week 2)
- Concentrations: 0.5 % (intradermal exposure, day 0), 25 % (epicutaneous exposure, day 7)
- Site: nape and upper back area
A1. INTRADERMAL INJECTIONS
- No. of exposures: 6 intradermal injections in groups of two per animal
- Test group (1 group of 20 animals):
1) 50% (v/v) FCA/distilled water emulsion
2) Test item as a 0.5% (w/v) formulation in diethyl phthalate
3) Test item as a 0.5% (w/v) formulation in FCA/distilled water emulsion (50% v/v)
- Control group (1 group of 10 animals - Vehicle Control):
1) 50% (v/v) FCA/distilled water emulsion
2) Undiluted diethyl phthalate
3) Diethyl phthalate as a 50% (w/v) formulation in FCA/distilled water emulsion (50% v/v)
- Site: nape and upper back area
A2. EPIDERMAL APPLICATIONS
- On Day 6, the nape and upper back area of each animal in the test and the vehicle control groups were re-clipped. On Day 7, a 0.8 mL quantity of the freshly prepared material was applied onto the previously described patch system. The test substance was applied to the test group as a 25% w/v formulation in diethyl phthalate. The undiluted vehicle material was applied to the vehicle control group. Patches were fixed as described above. The dressings were left in place for approximately 48 hours. Reaction sites were assessed for erythema and edema 24 and 48 hours after removal of the dressing.
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day of challenge: Day 21
- Exposure period: 24 hours
- Test group: On Day 20, the appropriate skin sites of the test, the naive control, and the vehicle control groups were clipped. On Day 21, a 0.4 mL quantity of the freshly prepared formulation was applied onto the described patch system. The test substance patch was applied to the clipped area of the left flank, and a vehicle material patch was applied to the clipped surface of the right flank of each animal in the test, naive control, and vehicle groups.
- Control groups (Vehicle Control Group, Naive Control Group): The control animals were treated in the same way as described above.
- Concentration: 5% (w/v) formulation in diethyl phthalate
- Evaluation: 24, 48, and 72 hours after removal of the dressing
OTHER:
Body Weights: Initial body weights were measured just prior to the first exposure of a respective group of animals, with the exception of naive control animals which were weighed concurrently with the induced groups of animals which they served. Final body weights were taken subsequent to the
receipt of the Sponsor's authorization to terminate testing. Final body weights were not taken for pilot animals due to their short term study participation. - Challenge controls:
- No positive reactions were noted after the challenge application, neither when treated with diethyl phthalate alone nor when treated with a 5% test item formulation.
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Historical positive control data on Alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde, tech., 85% as a 5% (w/v) formulation in Acetone included in the report
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- Historical positive control data available.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: none.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: none.
- Reading:
- other: 3rd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: other: 3rd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: none.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- other: vehicle control group
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: other: vehicle control group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- other: vehicle control group
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: other: vehicle control group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
- Reading:
- other: 3rd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- other: vehicle control group
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: other: 3rd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: other: vehicle control group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- other: naive control group
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: other: naive control group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- other: naive control group
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: other: naive control group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
- Reading:
- other: 3rd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 72
- Group:
- other: naive control group
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: other: 3rd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: other: naive control group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions chosen, the test article did not cause allergic reactions to guinea pig skin and is therefore not considered as skin sensitizer.
- Executive summary:
In a guinea pig maximization test according to OECD guideline No. 406, 10 male and 10 female animals were first induced and then challenged with the test article to investigate its sensitization potential. Induction was a two-stage operation: First, three pairs of intradermal injections (0.5 % test substance in diethyl phthalate) were made into the nape and upper back area of the animals with a 1:1 mixture (v/v) of FCA/ physiological saline, the test substance in diethyl phthalate, and the test substance in a 1:1 mixture (v/v) of FCA/ physiological saline. One week later, 0.8 ml of the test article in diethyl phthalate at a concentration of 25% was spread onto a patch consisting of a 20 mm x 20 mm Webril® pad and applied to the clipped backs of the animals for 48 hours. Two weeks after the epidermal induction application the animals were tested on the flank with 5% test substance in diethyl phthalate and the vehicle alone for 24 hours. Twenty four hours after removing the dressings the challenge reactions were graded according the Draize scoring scale. Two additional evaluations were made 48 and 72 hours after removing the dressings. A control group (5 m/5 f) was treated with adjuvant and the vehicle during the induction period. A second control group remained untreated during induction. During the challenge period both control groups were treated with the vehicle as well as with the test compound. No animal of the test group was sensitized by the test substance, all skin reactions at any time point were scored 0. Therefore, under the experimental conditions of this study, the test material is non-sensitizing when topically applied to albino guinea pigs.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.