Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Magnusson & Kligman Maximization Study in the Guinea Pig;
Author:
R.L. Guest,
Year:
1989
Bibliographic source:
Safepharm Project No. 140/80R; Test Report, Derby; DE1 2BT; U.K; 1989
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
OPINION ON Acid Orange 7
Author:
European Commission
Year:
2011
Bibliographic source:
Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety SCCS OPINION ON Acid Orange 7 COLIPA n° C15;22 March 2011

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
other: Magnusson & Kligman Maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The available non LLNA data is sufficent for deciding the classification of the substance.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sodium 4-[(2-hydroxy-1-naphthyl)azo]benzenesulphonate
EC Number:
211-199-0
EC Name:
Sodium 4-[(2-hydroxy-1-naphthyl)azo]benzenesulphonate
Cas Number:
633-96-5
Molecular formula:
C16H12N2O4S.Na
IUPAC Name:
sodium 4-[(2-hydroxy-1-naphthyl)diazenyl]benzenesulfonate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report):Acid Orange 7
- Substance type:organic

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
other: liquid paraffin
Challenge
Route:
epicutaneous, open
Vehicle:
other: liquid paraffin
No. of animals per dose:
20 females in test group, 10 females in control group
Details on study design:
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Exposure period: 48 hours
- Test groups: 20 females in test group
- Control group: 10 females in control group
- Site: intradermal
- Duration:25 days
- Frequency of applications: daily
- Concentrations: 25% in liquid paraffin, 25% dilution of the test item in FCA plus liquid paraffin; ratio 1:1. One week later, the epidermal induction of sensitization was conducted under occlusion with the test item at 50% in paraffin for 48 hours.

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2
- Site: Cutaneous
- Concentrations: 10% and 5% in liquid paraffin
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 hours
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
other: induction
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
30
Clinical observations:
By epidermal induction under occlusion with the test item at 50% in paraffin for 48 hours no any sensitization effects was observed.
Remarks on result:
other: see Remark
Remarks:
Reading: other: induction. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 30.0. Clinical observations: By epidermal induction under occlusion with the test item at 50% in paraffin for 48 hours no any sensitization effects was observed..
Reading:
other: challenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
30
Clinical observations:
No any cutaneous reactions were evaluated at 24 and 48 hours of observation.
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: other: challenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 30.0. Clinical observations: No any cutaneous reactions were evaluated at 24 and 48 hours of observation..

Any other information on results incl. tables

not sensitising

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
After challenge no skin reactions were observed. Therefore, based on the result in this adjuvant test in guinea pigs the test article Acid Orange 7 was considered as a non-sensitizer.
Executive summary:

After challenge no skin reactions were observed. Therefore, based on the result in this adjuvant test in guinea pigs the test article Acid Orange 7 was considered as a non-sensitizer.