Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sensitisation data (humans)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
from 24-09-2001 to 08-02-2002
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study performed in accordance with Standard Operating Procedures of Hill Top Research, INC. No official guideline available.
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2002
Report date:
2002

Materials and methods

Type of sensitisation studied:
skin
Study type:
study with volunteers
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The skin sensitising properties of Cyclobutanate were investigated in a Human Repeated Insult Patch Test (HRIPT), in which human volunteers were induced during 9 treatments, followed by a challenge treatment.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
441-420-8
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
113889-23-9
Molecular formula:
C14H20O2
IUPAC Name:
tricyclo[5.2.1.0²,⁶]dec-3-en-8-yl butanoate; tricyclo[5.2.1.0²,⁶]dec-4-en-8-yl butanoate
Test material form:
liquid

Method

Type of population:
general
Ethical approval:
not specified
Subjects:
- Number of subjects exposed: 129 (114 subjects completed the study)
- Sex: M (12) / F (102)
- No information on age and race
- Demographic information: no information available
Clinical history:
No information available.
Controls:
Yes, standard control substance taken into account
Route of administration:
dermal
Details on study design:
TYPE OF TEST(S) USED: patch test (epicutaneous test)

ADMINISTRATION
- Type of application: Occlusive
- Description of patch: No information available
- Vehicle / solvent: No information
- Concentrations: 5%
- Volume applied: 0.2 mL/patch
- Testing/scoring schedule: 9 induction treatments followed by a challenge which was read at 24, 48 and 72h
- Removal of test substance: no information available
- Other: test site: paraspinal region of the back

EXAMINATIONS
- Grading/Scoring system:
0 No visible reaction
1 Mild reaction
2 Moderate reaction
3 Severe reaction

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
SYMPTOMS
- Frequency, level, duration of symptoms observed:
Reactions to Cyclobutanate: isolated instance of mild erythema, at the challenge 2 instances of mild and one of moderate erythema were observed at the 24-hour evaluation, and were all resolved by the 48-hour evaluation.
Reactions to test substance B (control): mild erythema for subject No. 38 after application 2 which was resolved by application 6. At the challenge a single instance of mild erythema was observed at the 24-hour evaluation which was resolved by the 48-hour evaluation.
NO. OF PERSONS WITH/OUT REACTIONS COMPARED TO STUDY POPULATION
- Number of subjects with positive reactions: 2
- Number of subjects with negative reactions: 112
- Number of subjects with equivocal reactions: 0
- Number of subjects with irritating reactions: 0

RESULT OF CASE REPORT: For the 2 subjects who exhibited a positive challenge, No. 28 and 49, a rechallenge was performed under the same testing conditions as specified in the original protocol. There was no sensitization indicated at rechallenge at the 24-, 48-, and 72-hour evaluations.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In a Human Repeated Insult Patch Test performed with human volunteers, a positive skin reaction at challenge was seen in 2 out of 114 test subjects. These subjects were rechallenged and no skin sensitization was indicated at 24, 48 and 72 hours after rechallenge application.
Executive summary:

The sensitising potential of Cyclobutanate was determined in a Human Repeated Insult Patch Test (HRIPT), which was performed according to Standard Operating Procedures of the research lab (no guideline available). Topical application was performed with 5% Cyclobutanate and a control substance.

Reactions to Cyclobutanate: isolated instance of mild erythema, at the challenge 2 instances of mild and one of moderate erythema were observed at the 24-hour evaluation, and were all resolved by the 48-hour evaluation. Reactions to the control substance: mild erythema for subject No. 38 after application 2 which was resolved by application 6. At the challenge a single instance of mild erythema was observed at the 24-hour evaluation which was resolved by the 48-hour evaluation.

Under the conditions of this study, a positive skin reaction at challenge was seen in 2 out of 114 test subjects. These subjects were rechallenged and no sensitization was indicated at 24, 48 and 72 hours after rechallenge application.