Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
15-16 March 1995
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Guideline study, to GLP

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1995
Report date:
1995

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Tetramminepalladium (II) hydrogen carbonate
IUPAC Name:
Tetramminepalladium (II) hydrogen carbonate
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
134620-00-1
Cas Number:
134620-00-1
IUPAC Name:
134620-00-1
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Tetrammine palladium hydrogen carbonate
- Substance type: No data
- Physical state: pale yellow powder
- Analytical purity: No data
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): No data
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: No data
- Isomers composition: No data
- Purity test date: No data
- Lot/batch No.: DD0274
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: No data
- Stability under test conditions: No data
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Percival Ltd., Motson, Sandbach, Cheshire, UK
- Age at study initiation: 12-16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.60 kg
- Housing: Individually housed in a suspended metal cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18-19 deg C
- Humidity (%): 49-50%
- Air changes (per hr): 15/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 15 March 1995 To: 16 March 1995

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: the untreated eye acted as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL (equivalent to 91 mg)
- Concentration (if solution): Not applicable

VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): Not applicable
- Concentration (if solution): Not applicable
- Lot/batch no. (if required): Not applicable
- Purity: Not applicable
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Observation period (in vivo):
24 hours [animal was killed for humane reasons after 24 hours due to signs of pain and discomfort]
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
One
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Not done
- Time after start of exposure: Not applicable

SCORING SYSTEM: Modified Kay and Calandra classification system

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: No data

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
single animal tested
Time point:
other: 1 hour
Score:
53
Max. score:
110
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks on result:
other: animal killed at 24 hr for humane reasons
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
single animal tested
Time point:
24 h
Score:
81
Max. score:
110
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks on result:
other: animal killed at 24 hr for humane reasons
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
single animal tested
Time point:
other: 1 hour
Score:
40
Max. score:
80
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks on result:
other: animal killed at 24 hr for humane reasons
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
single animal tested
Time point:
24 h
Score:
60
Max. score:
80
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks on result:
other: animal killed at 24 hr for humane reasons
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
single animal tested
Time point:
other: 1 hour
Score:
5
Max. score:
10
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks on result:
other: animal killed at 24 hr for humane reasons
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
single animal tested
Time point:
24 h
Score:
5
Max. score:
10
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks on result:
other: animal killed at 24 hr for humane reasons
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
single animal tested
Time point:
other: 1 hour
Score:
8
Max. score:
20
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks on result:
other: animal killed at 24 hr for humane reasons
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
single animal tested
Time point:
24 h
Score:
16
Max. score:
20
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks on result:
other: animal killed at 24 hr for humane reasons
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
single animal tested
Time point:
other: 1 h
Score:
2
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks on result:
other: animal killed at 24 hr for humane reasons
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
single animal tested
Time point:
24 h
Score:
3
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks on result:
other: animal killed at 24 hr for humane reasons
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Translucent corneal opacity was noted at the 1-hour observation with opalescent corneal opacity at the 24-hour observation.
Iridial inflammation was noted at the 1 and 24-hour observations.
Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted at the 1-hour observation with severe conjunctival irritation at the 24-hour observation.
The nictitating and conjunctival membranes were pale in appearance with petechial haemorrhage of the nictitating membrane at the 1 and 24-hour observations.

Due to signs of pain and discomfort the animal was killed after 24-hour observation for humane reasons.
Other effects:
Residual test material was noted in the treated eye 1 and 24 hours after treatment.

Any other information on results incl. tables

 Irritation Parameter   

 Time after treatment   

 1 hour  24 hours
 Cornea    
 Degree of opacity  2  3
 Area of opacity  4  4
 Score  40  60
 Iris  1  1
 Score  5  5
 Conjunctivae    
 Redness  2  2
 Chemosis  2  3
 Discharge  0  3
 Score  8  16
 Total score  53  81

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
In a guideline study, to GLP, undiluted tetraamminepalladium(II) hydrogen carbonate (0.1 mL; 91 mg) produced very severe eye irritation following instillation into the eye of one rabbit. The animal was killed at 24 hours for humane reasons.
Executive summary:

In an OECD guideline study (TG 405), conducted according to GLP, undiluted tetraamminepalladium(II) hydrogen carbonate (0.1 mL; 91 mg), was instilled into one eye of a single New Zealand white rabbit. The other eye remained untreated and acted as the control.

 

The treated eye was assessed, after 1 and 24 hours, using a modified Kay and Calandra classification system for signs of irritation on the cornea, iris and conjunctiva.

 

Tetraamminepalladium(II) hydrogen carbonate produced a maximum group mean score of 81.0 [maximum total score possible = 110] at 24 hours. The animal was killed at 24 hours for humane reasons and no further animals were tested.

 

The substance was, therefore, considered a very severe irritant in this test system. As the results were based on only one rabbit, it is not possible to give a definitive interpretation according to EU CLP criteria (EC 1272/2008). However, it is considered appropriate to classify the test material for serious eye damage (Category 1), as the severe effects observed are not expected to be reversible.