Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From Jul. 16, 1980 to Sep. 8, 1980
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1980
Report date:
1980

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
No independent repeat test conducted.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Reaction mass of Bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidyl) sebacate and Methyl 1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidyl sebacate
EC Number:
915-687-0
Molecular formula:
unspecified
IUPAC Name:
Reaction mass of Bis(1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidyl) sebacate and Methyl 1,2,2,6,6-pentamethyl-4-piperidyl sebacate

Method

Target gene:
Histidine (his- to his+) and tryptophan (tryp- to tryp+) genes in Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli respectively.
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvr A
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Toxicity test (performed on strain TA 100): 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, and 2000 µg/0.1 mL.
Experiment (performed on all strains): 5, 10, 50, 100, 500, 1000, and 5000 µg/0.1 mL.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: None provided.
Method for suspension of refractory substances: Ultrasonication
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: See Table 1
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48 - 55 hours at 37 degrees C.

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 Petri dishes/strain/group.

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth
Evaluation criteria:
When the colonies had been counted, the arithmetic mean was calculated. A test substance is generally considered to be non-mutagenic if the colony count in relation to the negative control is not doubled at any concentration.
Statistics:
When the colonies had been counted, the arithmetic mean was calculated. Statistical analysis was not performed.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: At the concentrations of 500, 1,000, and 5,000 µg/0.1mL, the substance precipitated in soft agar.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

DETAILS ON EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS:

In the experiments performed without and with microsomal activation, comparison of the number of back-mutant colonies in the controls and the cultures treated with the various concentrations of the test article revealed no marked deviations.

TA 98 TA 100 TA 1535 TA 1537 TA 1538 WP2uvrA
Dose (µg/0.1 ml) -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9
solvent control 27 53 166 106 12 7 4 10 9 31 24 25
5 14 39 155 109 8 10 6 12 9 30 23 21
10 18 59 154 99 10 8 4 12 11 31 22 12
50 16 50 157 102 11 10 5 13 13 30 21 21
100 21 42 146 93 11 11 5 5 9 37 23 19
500 19 50 137 90 8 12 3 12 5 38 17 17
1000 15 55 171 101 10 9 2 13 10 27 16 17
5000 15 65 142 94 5 10 0 7 5 28 17 11
positive controls:
solvent control 17 45 180 146 11 12 11 17 9 32 19 15
concentration A 385 1163 712 1131 >1500 530 136 73 ~1100 374 318 617
concentration B 533 1261 1187 1932 >2000 1000 52 >1500 280 430 764

For details on positive controls see table 1 above.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
No evidence for a mutagenic effect was obtained in Salmonella strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 1538 and E.coli strain WP2 uvr A treated with up to 5000 µg/plate in experiments with and without microsomal activa¬tion.