Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 610-202-6 | CAS number: 446299-80-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://www.echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vitro
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 05 November 2020 - 17 November 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 020
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD guideline No. 442E: "In vitro skin sensitization: human Cell Line Activation Test (h CLAT)"
- Version / remarks:
- 2018
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- activation of dendritic cells
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Boronic acid, [6-(benzoylmethylamino)-5-methyl-3-pyridinyl]-
- Cas Number:
- 446299-81-6
- Molecular formula:
- C14H15BN2O3
- IUPAC Name:
- Boronic acid, [6-(benzoylmethylamino)-5-methyl-3-pyridinyl]-
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
In vitro test system
- Details on the study design:
- Details on study design:
TEST SYSTEM
- Cell line used, storage conditions and source: THP-1 (ATCC, #TIB-202), stored in liquid nitrogen and sub-cultured twice weekly.
- Culture medium and conditions: RPMI 1640 medium, GlutaMAX™ supplement including 25 mM HEPES, supplemented with 10% FBS, 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 4.5 g/L glucose, 1% (v/v) sodium pyruvate and appropriate antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin).
The cells were grown using general culture procedures and maintained in a humidified incubator set at 37± 1.5ºC, 5± 0.5% CO2 and were not allowed to exceed a cell density of 1 E06 cells/mL or more than 30 passages. Reactivity checks were performed to qualify the cells before testing.
The passage numbers of the used THP-1 cells were 22 K1 and 22 K2 in the cytotoxicity tests and 23 and 25 in the h CLAT for runs 1 and 2, respectively.
- Cell culture for testing: On the day of the cytotoxicity or main experiment, directly before the treatment of the cells, a volume of 500 µL with a cell density of 1.8 - 2 E06 THP-1 cells/mL was seeded in each corresponding well of a 24-well flat bottom plate.
CONTROLS
- Medium Control: culture medium.
- Solvent Control for the Test Item: DMSO (final concentration for cytotoxicity and for h-CLAT 0.2%).
- Positive control: 2,4-Dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB, purity ≥ 99%) at 3 and 4 µg/mL in DMSO (final concentration 0.2%).
- Solvent Control for the Positive Control: dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, purity ≥ 99%), dissolved at 0.2% in culture medium.
STUDY DESIGN
- Solubility assessment: As tested by a solubility test, 1000 µg/mL in 0.2% (v/v) DMSO in culture medium was used as highest test item concentration in the cytotoxicity test, as recommended in the OECD 442E.
- Dose Finding assay (PI Assay):
The test item concentrations investigated in the main experiments (h-CLAT) were determined with two cytotoxicity tests. The tests were performed with independent cell cultures (cells are collected from different culture flasks). The test item was prepared separately for each run. The test item dilutions were prepared freshly before each experiment. Each volume (500 µL) of the dilutions of the test item, culture medium and solvent control (0.2% (v/v) DMSO in culture medium) were added to the cells. The treated THP-1 cells were incubated for 24 ± 0.5 hours. All dose groups were tested in one replicate for each cytotoxicity test. At the end of the incubation period, the cell cultures were microscopically evaluated for morphological alterations.
Each concentration of the test item, culture medium and solvent control were prepared for the 7-AAD staining.
Each test item-treated and not test item-treated cells were collected in sample tubes, centrifuged (approx. 250 x g, 5 min), washed twice (2 - 8 °C) with 2 mL FACS buffer (PBS with 0.1% (w/v) BSA) and re-suspended in a final volume of 2 mL/tube FACS buffer. At least 10 minutes before the flow cytometry acquisition, 5 µL of a 7-AAD solution were added in each sample tube.
The cytotoxicity was analysed by flow cytometry using the software Cellquest Pro 6.0. The 7-AAD acquisition channel (FL-3) was set for the optimal detection of DNA-bound 7 AAD fluorescence signal.
- Main test (CD86/CD54 expression measurement):
The test item was tested in two independent runs. The tests were performed with independent cell cultures (cells are collected from different culture flasks) and on different days. The test item was prepared separately for each run. Since the CV75 could not be determined, the OECD 442E guideline recommended maximal to be tested test item concentration (1000 µg/mL) prepared in DMSO was used as highest concentrations for the h-CLAT. Further 7 dilutions were prepared by serial 1:1.2 dilution. The dilutions were prepared freshly before each experiment. Each solution was diluted with culture medium before application of the test solution to the cells to reach a final concentration of 0.2% (v/v) DMSO in the medium. Each volume (500 µL) of the dilutions of the test item, medium control, positive and DMSO control was added to the cells. The treated THP-1 cells were incubated for 24 ± 0.5 hours. At the end of the incubation period, the cell cultures were microscopically evaluated for morphological alterations. Each concentration of the test item, medium control, positive and DMSO control was prepared in triplicates for the different staining (with FITC-labelled anti-CD86, CD54 antibody or mouse IgG1).
The triplicates of each test item-treated and not test item-treated cells were pooled and equally distributed into three sample tubes, collected by centrifugation (approx. 250 x g, 5 min) and then washed twice with approx. 2 mL of FACS buffer (PBS with 0.1% (w/v) BSA). Thereafter, the cells were centrifuged, re-suspended and blocked with 600 µL of blocking solution at 2 - 8 °C (on ice) for approx. 15 min. After blocking, the cells were centrifuged and the cell pellets were re-suspended in 100 µL FACS buffer. The cells were stained with FITC-labelled anti-CD86, CD54 antibody or mouse IgG1 (isotype control). All solutions were kept light protected at 2 - 8 °C or on ice during the staining and analysis procedures. The cells with the different antibodies or the IgG1 were mixed and incubated light protected for 30 ± 5 min. at 2 - 8 °C (on ice).
After staining with the antibodies, the cells were washed twice (2 - 8 °C) with 2 mL FACS buffer and re-suspended in a final volume of 2 mL/tube FACS buffer. At least 10 minutes before the flow cytometry acquisition, 5 µL of a 7-AAD solution were added.
INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS
An h-CLAT prediction is considered POSITIVE if at least one of the following conditions is met in 2 of 2 or in at least 2 of 3 independent runs:
− The RFI of CD86 is ≥ 150% at any tested concentration (with cell viability ≥ 50%);
− The RFI of CD54 is ≥ 200% at any tested concentration (with cell viability ≥ 50%).
− Otherwise, the h-CLAT prediction is considered NEGATIVE.
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
- Cell viability of medium control and DMSO control should be more than 90%.
- In the solvent/vehicle control (i.e. DMSO), RFI values compared to the medium control of both CD86 and CD54 should not exceed the positive criteria (CD86 ≥ 150% and CD54 ≥ 200%).
- For both medium and solvent/vehicle controls (i.e. DMSO), the MFI ratio of CD86 and CD54 to isotype control should be > 105%.
- In the positive control (DNCB), RFI values of both CD86 and CD54 should meet the positive criteria (CD86 ≥ 150% and CD54 ≥ 200%) and the cell viability should be > 50% in at least one concentration of the two tested positive control concentrations.
- For the test chemical, the cell viability should be more than 50% in at least four tested concentrations in each run.
- Negative results are acceptable only for test items exhibiting a cell viability of < 90% at the highest concentration tested (i.e. 1.2 × CV75). If the cell viability at 1.2 × CV75 is ≥ 90% the negative result should be discarded. If 5000 μg/mL in saline (or medium or other solvents/vehicles), 1000 μg/mL in DMSO or the highest soluble concentration is used as the maximal test concentration of a test chemical, a negative result is acceptable even if the cell viability > 90%.
DEVIATIONS FROM OECD GUIDELINE: No.
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- The RFI values of the positive controls (DNCB) for CD54 and CD86 exceeded the positive criteria (CD54 ≥ 200% and CD86 ≥ 150%) and the cell viability was >50%.
In vitro / in chemico
Resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: 1
- Parameter:
- other: RFI (CD86)
- Value:
- 150
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Result obtained in one tested concentration (1000 µg/mL), at which also cell viability was >50%.
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: 1
- Parameter:
- other: RFI (CD54)
- Value:
- 200
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Result obtained in one tested concentration (1000 µg/mL), at which also cell viability was >50%.
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: 2
- Parameter:
- other: RFI (CD86)
- Value:
- 150
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Result obtained in one tested concentration (1000 µg/mL), at which also cell viability was >50%.
- Key result
- Run / experiment:
- other: 2
- Parameter:
- other: RFI (CD54)
- Value:
- 200
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Result obtained in one tested concentration (1000 µg/mL), at which also cell viability was >50%.
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: No.
DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: The technical proficiency of the h-CLAT with the OECD 442E guideline recommended proficiency substances was demonstrated.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS: All acceptance criteria were met in each run (see table below).
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Results of the Dose Finding Assay (Cytotoxicity Test) no. 1.
Test Group |
Concentration |
Microscopic Evaluation / Cytotoxicity |
Flow Cytometric Evaluation / |
Medium Control |
- |
no |
97.18 |
Solvent Control |
- |
no |
97.78 |
Test Item |
7.83 |
no |
97.63 |
15.7 |
no |
97.35 |
|
31.3 |
no |
96.64 |
|
62.5 |
no |
97.21 |
|
125 |
no |
97.24 |
|
250 |
no |
97.25 |
|
500 |
no |
96.40 |
|
1000 |
no |
95.97 |
Due to the lack of cytotoxicity in the Flow Cytometric Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity Test, a CV75 value could not be calculated.
Table 2. Results of the Dose Finding Assay (Cytotoxicity Test) no. 2.
Test Group |
Concentration |
Microscopic Evaluation / Cytotoxicity |
Flow Cytometric Evaluation / |
Medium Control |
- |
no |
97.20 |
Solvent Control |
- |
no |
97.99 |
Test Item |
7.83 |
no |
97.63 |
15.7 |
no |
97.62 |
|
31.3 |
no |
97.51 |
|
62.5 |
no |
97.57 |
|
125 |
no |
97.70 |
|
250 |
no |
97.41 |
|
500 |
no |
96.24 |
|
1000 |
no |
96.06 |
Due to the lack of cytotoxicity in the Flow Cytometric Evaluation of the Cytotoxicity Test, a CV75 value could not be calculated.
Table 3. Results of the h-CLAT Test. First run.
|
Concentration (µg/mL) |
RFI (%) |
RFI (%) |
Cell Viability (%) |
|
Medium Control |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
98.12 |
|
DMSO Control |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
97.99 |
|
Positive Control (DNCB) |
3.0 |
371.2* |
649.1* |
89.80 |
|
4.0 |
537.0* |
644.7* |
86.16 |
||
Test Item |
279 |
104.1 |
106.5 |
97.04 |
|
335 |
98.6 |
98.2 |
97.14 |
||
402 |
106.8 |
116.7 |
97.22 |
||
482 |
124.7 |
121.5 |
96.03 |
||
579 |
143.8 |
105.1 |
95.47 |
||
694 |
152.1 |
134.2 |
96.50 |
||
833 |
143.8 |
105.1 |
94.32 |
||
1000 |
221.9* |
279.3* |
85.40 |
||
* RFI value of CD86 or CD54 fulfilled the positive criteria (CD86 ≥ 150% and CD54 ≥ 200%).
Table 4. Results of the h-CLAT Test. Second run.
|
Concentration (µg/mL) |
RFI (%) |
RFI (%) |
Cell Viability (%) |
|
Medium Control |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
97.00 |
|
DMSO Control |
- |
100.0 |
100.0 |
97.30 |
|
Positive Control (DNCB) |
3.0 |
333.3* |
147.7# |
89.16 |
|
4.0 |
470.2* |
768.8* |
79.64 |
||
Test Item |
279 |
109.5 |
83.9 |
96.93 |
|
335 |
119.0 |
112.8 |
97.40 |
||
402 |
150.0 |
126.1 |
96.31 |
||
482 |
116.7 |
114.7 |
96.71 |
||
579 |
131.0 |
103.2 |
96.09 |
||
694 |
139.3 |
118.8 |
95.68 |
||
833 |
131.0 |
125.7 |
94.82 |
||
1000 |
211.9* |
242.7* |
84.97 |
||
* RFI value of CD86 or CD54 fulfilled the positive criteria (CD86 ≥ 150% and CD54 ≥ 200%).
# CD86 RFI value of the positive control (3.0 µg/mL DNCB) did not fulfil the positive criteria (CD86 ≥ 150%) due to a technical error. This value was not evaluated.
Table 5. Acceptance criteria of the h-CLAT Test. First run.
Cell viability of medium control and DMSO control should be more than 90%. Medium: 98.12% DMSO: 97.99% |
In the positive control (DNCB), RFI values of both CD54 and CD86 should exceed the positive criteria (CD54 ≥ 200% and CD86 ≥ 150%) and the cell viability should be > 50%. 3 µg/mL DNCB (CD 54): 371.2% 3 µg/mL DNCB (CD 86): 649.1% 4 µg/mL DNCB (CD 54): 537.0% 4 µg/mL DNCB (CD 86): 644.7% |
In the DMSO control, RFI values compared to the medium control of both CD54 and CD86 should not exceed the positive criteria (CD54 ≥ 200% and CD86 ≥ 150%). CD54: 112.3% CD86: 91.1% |
For medium and DMSO controls, the MFI ratio of CD54 and CD86 to isotype control should be > 105%. Medium CD 54: 124.6% Medium CD 86: 214.4% DMSO CD 54: 127.2% DMSO CD 86: 202.6% |
Table 6. Acceptance criteria of the h-CLAT Test. Second run.
Cell viability of medium control and DMSO control should be more than 90%. Medium: 97.00% DMSO: 97.30% |
In the positive control (DNCB), RFI values of both CD54 and CD86 should exceed the positive criteria (CD54 ≥ 200% and CD86 ≥ 150%) and the cell viability should be > 50%. 3 µg/mL DNCB (CD 54): 333.3% 3 µg/mL DNCB (CD 86): 147.7%# 4 µg/mL DNCB (CD 54): 470.2% 4 µg/mL DNCB (CD 86): 768.8% |
In the DMSO control, RFI values compared to the medium control of both CD54 and CD86 should not exceed the positive criteria (CD54 ≥ 200% and CD86 ≥ 150%). CD54: 129.2% CD86: 103.3% |
For medium and DMSO controls, the MFI ratio of CD54 and CD86 to isotype control should be > 105%. Medium CD 54: 123.7% Medium CD 86: 177.0% DMSO CD 54: 131.3% DMSO CD 86: 181.3% |
# CD86 RFI value of the positive control (3.0 µg/mL DNCB) did not fulfil the positive criteria (CD86 ≥ 150%) due to a technical error. This value was not evaluated.
Table 7. Historical control data.
Positive Control |
(MFI - MFI(ISO)DMSO)/ |
|||||
DNCB (3 µg/mL) |
DNCB (4 µg/mL) |
|||||
Antibody |
CD 54 |
CD 86 |
CD 54 |
CD 86 |
CD 54 |
CD 86 |
Value should be |
≥ 200% |
≥ 150% |
≥ 200% |
≥ 150% |
< 200% |
< 150% |
Mean Value [%] |
320.4 |
476.2 |
416.0 |
508.5 |
114.1 |
108.4 |
Standard Deviation |
81.2 |
324.2 |
120.7 |
278.0 |
18.0 |
12.7 |
Max Value [%] |
551.0 |
1952.4 |
697.1 |
1672.8 |
172.5 |
140.7 |
Low Value [%] |
168.0 |
183.0 |
127.6 |
191.2 |
76.1 |
77.6 |
Total number of runs |
45 |
These values represent historical control data conducted in 2019.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: The h-CLAT test result is considered as part of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) in accordance with OECD guideline 442E.
- Conclusions:
- The test item activated THP-1 cells under the test conditions of this study. Therefore, the test item is considered positive in the h-CLAT Test.
- Executive summary:
An in vitro Human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) was performed as part of an integrated approach to support the identification of the sensitization potential of the test item in accordance with OECD Guideline 442E, under GLP conditions. Based on the results from a solubility assay, two Dose-Range Finding (cytotoxicity) assays were conducted with the test item dissolved in DMSO and further diluted in culture medium (final concentration of 0.2% (v/v) DMSO in culture medium). Due to the lack of cytotoxicity, a CV75 value could not be calculated. Therefore, maximal test item concentration of 1000 µg/mL was used as recommended in the Guideline. The concentrations 279, 335, 402, 482, 579, 694, 833, 1000 µg/mL of the test item were tested in 2 independent main experiments (h-CLAT). In the DMSO control, RFI values compared to the medium control of both CD54 and CD86 did not exceed the positive criteria (CD54 ≥ 200% and CD86 ≥ 150%). The RFI values of the positive controls (DNCB) for CD54 and CD86 exceeded the positive criteria (CD54 ≥ 200% and CD86 ≥ 150%) and the cell viability was >50%, with one exception. The CD86 RFI value of the positive control (3.0 µg/mL DNCB) in the second h-CLAT run did not exceed the positive criterion (CD86 ≥ 150%). However, this one exception is considered to be acceptable since the CD86 RFI value of the positive control (4.0 µg/mL DNCB) in the second h-CLAT run exceeded the positive criteria. The RFI of CD86 and/or CD54 for the test item was equal or greater than 150% and 200%, respectively, in at least one concentration of both runs. Therefore, the h-CLAT prediction is considered positive for the test item in this h-CLAT.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)