Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The calculation was based on fragment method using KOWWIN (v1.68) module of software EPI Suite v.4.10.
GLP compliance:
no
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
10.71
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: The substance is within the applicability domain of the model.

The molecular weight is within range of training and validation set.

1. KOWWIN Program (v1.68) Results:

Log Kow(version 1.68 estimate): 10.71

SMILES : c1(c4ccc(c6ccccc6)cc4)nc(c5ccc(c3ccccc3)cc5)nc(c2c(O)cc(OC(C)C(=O)OCCCCCCCC)cc2)n1

MOL FOR: C44 H43 N3 O4

MOL WT : 677.85

TYPE 

 NUM

        LOGKOW FRAGMENT DESCRIPTION        

  COEFF 

  VALUE

Frag 

  2 

  -CH3    [aliphatic carbon]               

 0.5473 

  1.0946

Frag 

  7 

  -CH2-   [aliphatic carbon]               

 0.4911 

  3.4377

Frag 

  1 

  -CH     [aliphatic carbon]               

 0.3614 

  0.3614

Frag 

 33 

  Aromatic Carbon                          

 0.2940 

  9.7020

Frag 

  3 

  Aromatic Nitrogen                        

-0.7324 

 -2.1972

Frag 

  1 

  -OH     [hydroxy, aromatic attach]       

-0.4802 

 -0.4802

Frag 

  1 

  -O-   [oxygen, one aromatic attach]      

-0.4664 

 -0.4664

Frag 

  1 

  -C(=O)O  [ester, aliphatic attach]       

-0.9505 

 -0.9505

Factor

  1 

  sym-Triazine ring correction             

 0.8856 

  0.8856

Factor

  1 

  Ortho-substituted aromatic at ncn location

-0.9063 

 -0.9063

Const

    

  Equation Constant                        

        

  0.2290

Log Kow   =  10.7097

 

2. Applicability Domain of KOWWIN v1.68

Model:

KOWWIN v1.68

Substance:

 

CAS:

204848-45-3

SMILES:

c1(c4ccc(c6ccccc6)cc4)nc(c5ccc(c3ccccc3)cc5)nc(c2c(O)cc(OC(C)C(=O)OCCCCCCCC)cc2)n1

Molecular Weight:

677.85

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Molecular weight

Minimum

Maximum

Average

 

 

 

 

Training set

18.02

719.92

199.98

 

 

 

 

Validation set

27.03

991.15

258.98

 

 

 

 

Assessment of molecular weight

Molecular weight within range of training and validation set.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix D: KOWWIN Fragments, Correction Factors, Coefficients and Frequency

 

 

 

 

 

The Tables below lists KOWWIN Fragment and Correction Factor descriptors with their coefficient values (Coef).

 

 

 

Max = maximum number of the fragment or correction factor that occurs in any individual compound

 

 

 

 

Number = the number of individual compounds having the fragment or correction factor in the dataset

 

 

 

 

The training dataset includes a total of 2447 compounds.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The validation dataset includes a total of 10946 compounds.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part 1: Fragments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fragment

Descriptor

Coef

Training Set

Validation Set

No. of instances of each fragment for the current substance

 

 

 

Max

Number

Max

Number

.

-CH3

[aliphatic carbon]

0.5473

13

1401

20

7413

2

-CH2-

[aliphatic carbon]

0.4911

18

1083

28

7051

7

-CH

[aliphatic carbon]

0.3614

16

460

23

3864

1

Aromatic Carbon

 

0.294

24

1790

30

8792

33

Aromatic Nitrogen

 

-0.7324

4

251

4

1349

3

-OH

[hydroxy, aromatic attach]

-0.4802

3

193

4

611

1

-O-

[oxygen, one aromatic attach]

-0.4664

3

203

5

1770

1

-C(=O)O  

[ester, aliphatic attach]

-0.9505

3

113

6

1178

1

Part 2: Correction Factors

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Correction Factor Descriptor

Coef

Training Set

Validation Set

No. of instances of each correction factor for the current substance

Max

Number

Max

Number

.

sym-Triazine ring correction

 

0.8856

1

40

1

81

1

Ortho-substituted aromatic at ncn location

 

-0.9063

1

17

1

4

1

Conclusions:
The partition coefficient of test substance was calculated to be log Pow= 10.7 at 25°C
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2003
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 117 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), HPLC Method)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
HPLC method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
> 6
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: measured
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
10.71
Temp.:
25 °C
Remarks on result:
other: estimated
Details on results:
Under the above analytical conditions, the test substance) was found to elute after DDT which had a retention time of approximately 19 minutes (Figures 2 and 3). The test substance eluted after the mobile phase strength was increased to 100% methanol.
The test itme was found to be have a log Pow value of greater than 6.
Conclusions:
The test substance was determined to be have log Pow value of greater than 6 at 25°C and was estimated to be log Pow=10.7

Description of key information

Measured log Pow= >6 at 25°C
Estimated log Pow= 10.7 at 25°C

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
10.7
at the temperature of:
25 °C

Additional information

- A limted test was performed by HPLC and the calculation was using a LOGKOW computer program (Version 1.63, Syracuse Research Corporation) referred to study Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd., 2003.

- The estimation based on fragment method had been reviewed (2012) using KOWWIN (v1.68) module of software EPI Suite v.4.10. The substance is within the applicability domain of the model