Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
10-01-1995 to 27-01-1995
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1995
Report date:
1995

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
422-120-6
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
166432-53-7
Molecular formula:
C14H22O
IUPAC Name:
2-methyl-4-(2,2,3-trimethylcyclopent-3-en-1-yl)pent-4-enal
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
- Physical state: Liquid
- Storage condition of test material: in the refrigerator in the dark
- Other: clear colourless liquid

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Recognised animal supplier
- Age at study initiation: Young adult
- Weight at study initiation: 2.6 – 2.9 kg
- Housing: Individually housed in grid bottomed metal cages
- Diet: certified rabbit diet ad libitum (details in the full study report)
- Water: filtered certified water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 -21
- Humidity (%): 35 - 60
- Air changes (per hr): Not reported, however reported as air conditioned
- Photoperiod: 12 hours light / 12 hours dark

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 10-01-1995 To: 14-01-1995

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted

Duration of treatment / exposure:
A volume of 0.1 mL of the test item, was placed into the right eye, formed by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The upper and lower eyelids were held together for a few seconds immediately and then moved gently to distribute the test item around the surface of the eye. The left eye remained untreated (and was used for control purposes).
Observation period (in vivo):
Ocular assessment was conducted at approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation of the test item, according to numerical evaluation.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 (sex not specified).
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): None
- Time after start of exposure: Not applicable.

SCORING SYSTEM:
The irritation was assessed using criteria consistent with Draize (1977) numerical scoring system. At each observation period, each eye was assessed for damage or irritation to the cornea, iris and conjunctiva using the untreated eye as a control.

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Examination of the eye was facilitated by the use of the light from a standard light source according to BS 950 (artifical daylight for the assessment of colour).

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: mean; n=3
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
other: mean; n=3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
other: mean; n=3
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: mean; n=3
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No corneal or Iridial inflammation effects were noted. Very slight conjunctival reactions (redness, score = 1) was noted in treated eyes 1 hour after treatment. No chemosis effects were noted. All effects resolved within 24 hours observation.
Other effects:
- Lesions and clinical observations: None reported.
- Ophthalmoscopic findings: None reported.
- Histopathological findings: None reported.
- Effects of rinsing or washing: Not applicable.
- Other observations: None reported.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1. Individual scores and mean scores for 24, 48 and 72 hours

Organism number and sex

Time after treatment

Corneal Opacity

Iridial Inflammation

Conjunctival Redness

Conjunctival Chemosis

1 (sex not specified)

1h

0

0

1

0

 

24 h

0

0

0

0

 

48 h

0

0

0

0

 

72 h

0

0

0

0

 

Day 4

-

-

-

-

Mean (24 – 72 h)

 

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 (sex not specified)

1h

0

0

1

0

 

24 h

0

0

0

0

 

48 h

0

0

0

0

 

72 h

0

0

0

0

 

Day 4

-

-

-

-

Mean (24 – 72 h)

 

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 (sex not specified)

1h

0

0

1

0

 

24 h

0

0

0

0

 

48 h

0

0

0

0

 

72 h

0

0

0

0

 

Day 4

0

0

0

0

Mean (24 – 72 h)

 

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this study the test item is not irritating to the eye.
Executive summary:

The study was performed to EU Method B.5 and/or a method equivalent or similar to OECD TG 405 under GLP to assess the irritancy potential of the test item to the eye following a single application in the New Zealand White rabbit. A volume of 0.1 ml of the test item was placed into the left eye of three animals sequentially using the first as a sentinel. The other eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes. Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 1 hour and 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment. A single application of the test item to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced no corneal or Iridial inflammation effects. Slight conjunctival reaction (hyperaemia or redness, score = 1 and/or discharge, score = 1) was noted in treated eyes at 1 hour after treatment. No chemosis effects were noted. All treated eyes appeared normal at the 24 hours observation point. Under the conditions of this study, the test item is not considered to be irritating to the eye.