Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 274-765-6 | CAS number: 70693-39-9
Physical & Chemical properties
Partition coefficient
Currently viewing:
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the overall internal quality check in VEGA v1.1.3 indicates that the prediction is reliable with a Klimisch score of 2.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
VEGA version 1.1.3
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
ALogP Model v. 1.0.0
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: VEGA v1.1.3
- Model(s) used: ALogP Model version 1.0.0
The model is based on the Ghose-Crippen-Viswanadhan LogP (ALogP) and consists of a regression equation based on the hydrophobicity contribution of 120 atom types as described in: A.K. Ghose and G.M. Crippen, J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 565-577; V.N. Viswanadhan et al., J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1019-1026; A.K. Ghose, V.N. Viswanadhan, J.J. Wendoloski, J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3762-3772. For the purpose of applicability domain assessment, the training set of the Meylan LogP model (9,961 compounds) has been considered, setting all molecules as belonging to the test set.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 5.67
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the overall internal quality check in VEGA v1.1.3 indicates that the prediction is reliable with a Klimisch score of 2.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
VEGA version 1.1.3
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
Meylan/Kowwin v. 1.1.4
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: VEGA v1.1.3
- Model(s) used: Meylan/Kowwin LogP Model version 1.1.4
The model is based on the Atom/Fragment Contribution (AFC) method from the work of Meylan and Howard (W.M. Meylan and P.H. Howard, Atom/fragment contribution method for estimating octanol-water partition coefficients, 1995, J. Pharm. Sci. 84: 83-92.), as implemented in the EPI Suite KOWWIN module (http://www.epa.gov/oppt/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm). The calculated model has a lower bound of -5.0 log units (all predictions lower than this value are set to -5.0). A dataset of compounds with experimental logP values has been built starting from the original dataset provided in EPI suite. The set has been processed and cleared from compounds that were replicated or that had problems with the provided molecule structure. The final dataset has 9,961 compounds.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 6.74
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the overall internal quality check in VEGA v1.1.3 indicates that the prediction is reliable with a Klimisch score of 2.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
VEGA version 1.1.3
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
MLogP Model v. 1.0.0
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: VEGA v1.1.3
- Model(s) used: MLogP Model version 1.0.0
The model is based on the the Moriguchi LogP (MLogP) and consists of a regression equation based on 13 structural parameters as described in: I. Moriguchi, S. Hirono, Q. Liu, I. Nakagome, and Y. Matsushita, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 127-130; I. Moriguchi, S. Hirono, I. Nakagome, H. Hirano, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 976-978. For the purpose of applicability domain assessment, the training set of the Meylan LogP model (9,961 compounds) has been considered, setting all molecules as belonging to the test set.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 3.74
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the overall internal quality check in VEGA v1.1.3 indicates that the prediction is reliable with a Klimisch score of 2.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
VEGA version 1.1.3
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
ALogP Model v. 1.0.0
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: VEGA v1.1.3
- Model(s) used: ALogP Model version 1.0.0
The model is based on the Ghose-Crippen-Viswanadhan LogP (ALogP) and consists of a regression equation based on the hydrophobicity contribution of 120 atom types as described in: A.K. Ghose and G.M. Crippen, J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 565-577; V.N. Viswanadhan et al., J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1019-1026; A.K. Ghose, V.N. Viswanadhan, J.J. Wendoloski, J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3762-3772. For the purpose of applicability domain assessment, the training set of the Meylan LogP model (9,961 compounds) has been considered, setting all molecules as belonging to the test set.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 8.19
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the overall internal quality check in VEGA v1.1.3 indicates that the prediction is reliable with a Klimisch score of 2.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
VEGA version 1.1.3
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
Meylan/Kowwin v. 1.1.4
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: VEGA v1.1.3
- Model(s) used: Meylan/Kowwin LogP Model version 1.1.4
The model is based on the Atom/Fragment Contribution (AFC) method from the work of Meylan and Howard (W.M. Meylan and P.H. Howard, Atom/fragment contribution method for estimating octanol-water partition coefficients, 1995, J. Pharm. Sci. 84: 83-92.), as implemented in the EPI Suite KOWWIN module (http://www.epa.gov/oppt/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm). The calculated model has a lower bound of -5.0 log units (all predictions lower than this value are set to -5.0). A dataset of compounds with experimental logP values has been built starting from the original dataset provided in EPI suite. The set has been processed and cleared from compounds that were replicated or that had problems with the provided molecule structure. The final dataset has 9,961 compounds.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 9.86
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the overall internal quality check in VEGA v1.1.3 indicates that the prediction is reliable with a Klimisch score of 2.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
VEGA version 1.1.3
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
MLogP Model v. 1.0.0
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: VEGA v1.1.3
- Model(s) used: MLogP Model version 1.0.0
The model is based on the the Moriguchi LogP (MLogP) and consists of a regression equation based on 13 structural parameters as described in: I. Moriguchi, S. Hirono, Q. Liu, I. Nakagome, and Y. Matsushita, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 127-130; I. Moriguchi, S. Hirono, I. Nakagome, H. Hirano, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 976-978. For the purpose of applicability domain assessment, the training set of the Meylan LogP model (9,961 compounds) has been considered, setting all molecules as belonging to the test set.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 4.37
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the overall internal quality check in VEGA v1.1.3 indicates that the prediction is reliable with a Klimisch score of 2.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
VEGA version 1.1.3
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
ALogP Model v. 1.0.0
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: VEGA v1.1.3
- Model(s) used: ALogP Model version 1.0.0
The model is based on the Ghose-Crippen-Viswanadhan LogP (ALogP) and consists of a regression equation based on the hydrophobicity contribution of 120 atom types as described in: A.K. Ghose and G.M. Crippen, J. Comput. Chem. 1986, 7, 565-577; V.N. Viswanadhan et al., J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1019-1026; A.K. Ghose, V.N. Viswanadhan, J.J. Wendoloski, J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3762-3772. For the purpose of applicability domain assessment, the training set of the Meylan LogP model (9,961 compounds) has been considered, setting all molecules as belonging to the test set.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 12.97
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the overall internal quality check in VEGA v1.1.3 indicates that the prediction is reliable with a Klimisch score of 2.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
VEGA version 1.1.3
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
Meylan/Kowwin v. 1.1.4
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: VEGA v1.1.3
- Model(s) used: Meylan/Kowwin LogP Model version 1.1.4
The model is based on the Atom/Fragment Contribution (AFC) method from the work of Meylan and Howard (W.M. Meylan and P.H. Howard, Atom/fragment contribution method for estimating octanol-water partition coefficients, 1995, J. Pharm. Sci. 84: 83-92.), as implemented in the EPI Suite KOWWIN module (http://www.epa.gov/oppt/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm). The calculated model has a lower bound of -5.0 log units (all predictions lower than this value are set to -5.0). A dataset of compounds with experimental logP values has been built starting from the original dataset provided in EPI suite. The set has been processed and cleared from compounds that were replicated or that had problems with the provided molecule structure. The final dataset has 9,961 compounds.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 14.6
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available
- Endpoint:
- partition coefficient
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model, but not (completely) falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Remarks:
- The substance is not fully compliant with the applicability domain of the model. However, this calculation is used in a weight of evidence approach, in accordance to the REACh Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI General rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime set out in Annexes VII to X, 1.2. It is adequately documented and justified: the overall internal quality check in VEGA v1.1.3 indicates that the prediction is reliable with a Klimisch score of 2.
- Justification for type of information:
- 1. SOFTWARE
VEGA version 1.1.3
2. MODEL (incl. version number)
MLogP Model v. 1.0.0
3. SMILES OR OTHER IDENTIFIERS USED AS INPUT FOR THE MODEL
See “Test material information”
4. SCIENTIFIC VALIDITY OF THE (Q)SAR MODEL
See attached information on the model provided by the developer. Further information on the OECD criteria as outlined by the applicant is provided below under "Any other information of materials and methods incl. tables"
5. APPLICABILITY DOMAIN
See attached information and information as provided in "Any other information on results incl. tables".
6. ADEQUACY OF THE RESULT
See assessment of adequacy as outlined in the "Overall remarks, attachments" section. - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version: VEGA v1.1.3
- Model(s) used: MLogP Model version 1.0.0
The model is based on the the Moriguchi LogP (MLogP) and consists of a regression equation based on 13 structural parameters as described in: I. Moriguchi, S. Hirono, Q. Liu, I. Nakagome, and Y. Matsushita, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 127-130; I. Moriguchi, S. Hirono, I. Nakagome, H. Hirano, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 42, 976-978. For the purpose of applicability domain assessment, the training set of the Meylan LogP model (9,961 compounds) has been considered, setting all molecules as belonging to the test set.
- Model description: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and 'any other information on Material and methods'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Justification for type of information', 'Attached justification' and/or 'overall remarks' - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: QSAR
- Partition coefficient type:
- octanol-water
- Type:
- log Pow
- Partition coefficient:
- 7.62
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR result, no information on temperature and pH available.
Referenceopen allclose all
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
For detailed information on the results please refer to the attached report.
Description of key information
Log Pow > 6.5 (QSAR, Vega version 1.1.3 - three models: Meylan/Kowwin version 1.1.4, MLogP version 1.0.0, ALogP version 1.0.0)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Overall results
Table 1: For the three evaluated components of the substance, the Log Pow values as evaluated by the VEGA models (Meylan/KOWWIN, ALogP and MLogP) are reported. For each component, the two most similar substances identified by VEGA are also included (using their CAS number), together with their similarity degree with the target component, experimental Log Pow values and the predictions obtained by the VEGA models.
Evaluation of |
Molecule / CAS |
Similarity degree |
Experimental Log Pow |
Meylan / KOWWIN |
ALogP |
MLogP |
C5 tetraester |
Target |
- |
n.a. |
6.74 |
5.67 |
3.74 |
3290-92-4 |
0.801 |
4.39 |
4.505 |
3.952 |
2.733 |
|
107085-84-7 |
0.795 |
3.26 |
3.629 |
2.784 |
2.243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C9 tetraester |
Target |
- |
n.a. |
14.6 |
12.97 |
7.62 |
3786-76-3 |
0.779 |
2.9 |
0.765 |
2.862 |
1.77 |
|
5297-10-9 |
0.772 |
1.36 |
-0.774 |
1.76 |
1.064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C5 hexaester |
Target |
- |
n.a. |
9.86 |
8.19 |
4.37 |
31357-44-5 |
0.797 |
3.32 |
1.678 |
2.848 |
0.925 |
|
3786-76-3 |
0.791 |
2.9 |
0.765 |
2.862 |
1.77 |
Discussion
The applicability domain (AD) evaluation performed by the VEGA software suggests that the three representative molecules of the target substance may be out of the models’ applicability domain. For all the three considered molecules, their degree of similarity to the two most similar molecules identified in the models’ dataset is low. Moreover, experimental and predicted Log Pow values of the molecules similar to C9 tetraester and C5 hexaester, are very low compared to the predictions for those molecules themselves. The molecule identified as the most similar for component C5 tetraester (Table 1, CAS 3290-92-4), is the only one that shows a comparable structure to the target molecule, and its experimental and predicted Log Pow values are moderate rather than low The Meylan model evaluates the most similar substance with the highest accuracy, only slightly overestimating its Log Pow; ALogP is the second best model. Generally, for all molecules involved, values calculated with MLogP are lower than respective experimental data and other predictions, they can therefore be disregarded.
Conclusion
Considering the results obtained for target components and similar substances identified by the software, as discussed above, the estimation obtained for C5 tetraester component can be used as a lower boundary of the overall Log Pow for the substance. A Log Pow value > 6.5 can be therefore considered as a reasonable estimation for the target substance.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
